Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. "Cuties"

"Cuties"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
42 Posts 14 Posters 498 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CopperC Offline
    CopperC Offline
    Copper
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    It is OK to censor child pornography.

    Even if it creates some false-positive racism accusations.

    KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Copper

      It is OK to censor child pornography.

      Even if it creates some false-positive racism accusations.

      KlausK Offline
      KlausK Offline
      Klaus
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      @Copper said in "Cuties":

      It is OK to censor child pornography.

      Yes. It is also OK to object to racism. But both should actually be true. There's no evidence that this movie contains any explicit material that would qualify as pornography, child or otherwise.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        Imagine if they started censoring movies that glorified and/or glamourised violence and/or criminal behaviour.

        Netflix would be out of business in a week.

        I was only joking

        1 Reply Last reply
        • KlausK Offline
          KlausK Offline
          Klaus
          wrote on last edited by Klaus
          #34

          OK, I watched the trailer now. Calling this "child pornography" is just ridiculous and insults the victims of actual child pornography.

          Link to video

          LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
          • RainmanR Offline
            RainmanR Offline
            Rainman
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            Well, California just enacted a change in the law, where what used to be a misdemeanor if 4-years between the "couple" is now 10 years. I don't know: is that part of the slippery slope?

            1 Reply Last reply
            • CopperC Offline
              CopperC Offline
              Copper
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              There are various definitions of pornography.

              This is within some of them.

              Maybe not in others.

              KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
              • CopperC Copper

                There are various definitions of pornography.

                This is within some of them.

                Maybe not in others.

                KlausK Offline
                KlausK Offline
                Klaus
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                @Copper said in "Cuties":

                There are various definitions of pornography.
                This is within some of them.

                Then surely you should be able to explain one definition according to which this is pornography.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  OK, I'll give you 2 definitions wiki and google

                  The phrase "I know it when I see it" is a colloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters. The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio.[1][2] In explaining why the material at issue in the case was not obscene under the Roth test, and therefore was protected speech that could not be censored, Stewart wrote:

                  I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.[3]

                  https://www.google.com/search?q=pornography+definition&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS883US883&oq=pornography&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0j69i57j0.3163j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • KlausK Klaus

                    OK, I watched the trailer now. Calling this "child pornography" is just ridiculous and insults the victims of actual child pornography.

                    Link to video

                    LarryL Offline
                    LarryL Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    @Klaus said in "Cuties":

                    OK, I watched the trailer now. Calling this "child pornography" is just ridiculous and insults the victims of actual child pornography.

                    Link to video

                    If that was as bad as it got I would agree with you. Unfortunately, that trailer was so well cherry picked that it makes it look like a Disney movie.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      ||

                      Link to video||

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #41

                        Youtube comments seem unambiguous.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • LarryL Offline
                          LarryL Offline
                          Larry
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #42

                          ||spoiler||

                          Link to video||spoiler||

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups