"Cuties"
-
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 14:26 last edited by
It is OK to censor child pornography.
Even if it creates some false-positive racism accusations.
-
It is OK to censor child pornography.
Even if it creates some false-positive racism accusations.
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 15:18 last edited by -
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 15:34 last edited by
Imagine if they started censoring movies that glorified and/or glamourised violence and/or criminal behaviour.
Netflix would be out of business in a week.
-
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 15:38 last edited by Klaus
OK, I watched the trailer now. Calling this "child pornography" is just ridiculous and insults the victims of actual child pornography.
Link to video -
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 15:46 last edited by
Well, California just enacted a change in the law, where what used to be a misdemeanor if 4-years between the "couple" is now 10 years. I don't know: is that part of the slippery slope?
-
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 15:57 last edited by
There are various definitions of pornography.
This is within some of them.
Maybe not in others.
-
There are various definitions of pornography.
This is within some of them.
Maybe not in others.
-
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 17:03 last edited by
OK, I'll give you 2 definitions wiki and google
The phrase "I know it when I see it" is a colloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters. The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio.[1][2] In explaining why the material at issue in the case was not obscene under the Roth test, and therefore was protected speech that could not be censored, Stewart wrote:
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.[3]
-
OK, I watched the trailer now. Calling this "child pornography" is just ridiculous and insults the victims of actual child pornography.
Link to videowrote on 17 Sept 2020, 21:08 last edited byOK, I watched the trailer now. Calling this "child pornography" is just ridiculous and insults the victims of actual child pornography.
Link to videoIf that was as bad as it got I would agree with you. Unfortunately, that trailer was so well cherry picked that it makes it look like a Disney movie.
-
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 21:25 last edited by
||
Link to video|| -
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 21:30 last edited by
Youtube comments seem unambiguous.
-
wrote on 17 Sept 2020, 23:05 last edited by
||spoiler||
Link to video||spoiler||