Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Epstein File

The Epstein File

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
405 Posts 16 Posters 38.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    @Horace said in The Epstein File:

    But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.

    You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:

    IMG_0372.jpeg

    HoraceH Online
    HoraceH Online
    Horace
    wrote last edited by Horace
    #396

    @jon-nyc said in The Epstein File:

    @Horace said in The Epstein File:

    But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.

    You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:

    IMG_0372.jpeg

    It was an obvious political move, and it helped get them into power. There may even have been hopeful intentions behind it, that there would be juicy, politically useful stuff to prosecute or at least publicize in the files. I doubt Kash Patel or Pam Bondi were intimately familiar with what was in the files before they were installed in their positions. Doesn't seem to be much mysterious about any of this. Except the pizza and jerky. I also keep in mind that claiming to be an Epstein victim is big business, and those claimants have become rich, on sometimes very weak evidence. They have not named any names, for whatever reason. Except Guiffre, who is particularly unreliable. (I believe the stories about the ex-prince, but I find the Dershowitz allegations less convincing.)

    Education is extremely important.

    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      @jon-nyc said in The Epstein File:

      @Horace said in The Epstein File:

      But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.

      You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:

      IMG_0372.jpeg

      It was an obvious political move, and it helped get them into power. There may even have been hopeful intentions behind it, that there would be juicy, politically useful stuff to prosecute or at least publicize in the files. I doubt Kash Patel or Pam Bondi were intimately familiar with what was in the files before they were installed in their positions. Doesn't seem to be much mysterious about any of this. Except the pizza and jerky. I also keep in mind that claiming to be an Epstein victim is big business, and those claimants have become rich, on sometimes very weak evidence. They have not named any names, for whatever reason. Except Guiffre, who is particularly unreliable. (I believe the stories about the ex-prince, but I find the Dershowitz allegations less convincing.)

      RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by Renauda
      #397

      @Horace

      There may even have been hopeful intentions behind it, that there would be juicy, politically useful stuff to prosecute or at least publicize in the files.

      “may even have been hopeful intentions…”??

      Surely you jest.

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 89th

        But the Dow is up 50,000 dollars!

        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #398

        @89th said in The Epstein File:

        But the Dow is up 50,000 dollars!

        https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AwxDnvsSk/?mibextid=wwXIfr

        The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          said in The Epstein File:

          Wow. Does he thing he’s helping Trump????

          It’s not the headline above but in the video Lutnick says he and Epstein were a ‘one and done’. He says he met him once and immediately recognized this guy was a pervert and stayed away.

          Files say differently.

          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #399

          said in The Epstein File:

          It’s not the headline above but in the video Lutnick says he and Epstein were a ‘one and done’. He says he met him once and immediately recognized this guy was a pervert and stayed away.

          Files say differently.

          The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girl
            wrote last edited by
            #400

            Now that President Clinton and Sec. Clinton (who I don't think was ever mentioned in the files) have testified, do you think that the commission will call on President Trump and his wife to testify also?🤔

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #401

              No but I’m sure come 2029 the house will appreciate the precedent having been set.

              Melania better start practicing her English.

              The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

              taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 Online
                89th8 Online
                89th
                wrote last edited by
                #402

                Wait, you don't think "sorry no english" isn't an acceptable response to each question?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  No but I’m sure come 2029 the house will appreciate the precedent having been set.

                  Melania better start practicing her English.

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote last edited by
                  #403

                  @jon-nyc said in The Epstein File:

                  No but I’m sure come 2029 the house will appreciate the precedent having been set.

                  Maybe even 2027..................

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #404

                    A democratic house in 2027 is a certainty, barring some sort of election fraud by Trump. But he'll still be a sitting president so it'll have to wait until 29, assuming he lives that long.

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • taiwan_girlT Offline
                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                      taiwan_girl
                      wrote last edited by taiwan_girl
                      #405

                      Video of the appearances of President Clinton and Sec. Clinton. If you have 9 hours to kill, you can watch them both.

                      https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-bill-and-hillary-clinton-deposition-videos/

                      Former President Bill Clinton told lawmakers that President Donald Trump told him he had "some great ​times" with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein before their relationship soured, according to a video released on Monday.

                      In a videotaped deposition ‌to the House of Representatives Oversight Committee, the former Democratic president said under oath that Trump brought up Epstein at a golf tournament in 2002 or 2003, after Clinton left office and more than a decade before Trump was elected president.

                      "Somehow he knew I had flown in Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft," Clinton told the committee. "He said, 'You ​know, we had some great times together over the years, but we fell out all because of a real estate deal.'"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups