The Epstein File
-
As for the E files, only the young girls' names ought to have been redacted.
Epstein was a smiling monster, grooming, promising, moving, threatening, using young girls.
It's traumatic for them to recall their youthful past.As for Maxwell withholding testimony to bargain, well, for the hurt she has knowingly inflicted on so many, I'd give her life imprisonment without appeal, until and unless she fully confesses everything and gives full details.
Only then reconsider her sentence length when she has proven some repentance.It's all going to drag on for years, while various people resign and Trump doesn't, even as we wonder just how friendly Epstein was with the Russians.
-
OK, this is getting crazy. I'd like to bring a bit of sanity back to the discussion.
Here you go, and thank you for your attention to this matter....
-
OK, this is getting crazy. I'd like to bring a bit of sanity back to the discussion.
Here you go, and thank you for your attention to this matter....
The fuck is wrong with you. You are so deranged, D’Oh.
-
I recall a time not so long ago either, when the Trump tribe demanded the files be made public in order to prove that Epstein’s alleged suicide was, in fact, a mob style hit. The third party behind said hit being of course, “the Clintons” and presumably others in the sinister DNC.
We have now learned that that suspicion was nothing but coffee and doughnut shop gossip. A malicious conspiracy theory.
-
Can't speak for anybody else, but I've never been a Epstein files hawk. I continue to believe that if there was a there there, it would have been capitalized on, through official legal channels or otherwise, in the Biden administration. But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions. While those redactions missed Lutnick, a chief right hand man. Non-disprovable theories satisfying confirmation bias are so much fun.
I would like to know what they're talking about with all the references to pizza and jerky though. I don't guess the answer lies within the files.
-
Can't speak for anybody else, but I've never been a Epstein files hawk. I continue to believe that if there was a there there, it would have been capitalized on, through official legal channels or otherwise, in the Biden administration. But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions. While those redactions missed Lutnick, a chief right hand man. Non-disprovable theories satisfying confirmation bias are so much fun.
I would like to know what they're talking about with all the references to pizza and jerky though. I don't guess the answer lies within the files.
@Horace said in The Epstein File:
But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.
You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:
-
@Horace said in The Epstein File:
But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.
You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:
@jon-nyc said in The Epstein File:
@Horace said in The Epstein File:
But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.
You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:
It was an obvious political move, and it helped get them into power. There may even have been hopeful intentions behind it, that there would be juicy, politically useful stuff to prosecute or at least publicize in the files. I doubt Kash Patel or Pam Bondi were intimately familiar with what was in the files before they were installed in their positions. Doesn't seem to be much mysterious about any of this. Except the pizza and jerky. I also keep in mind that claiming to be an Epstein victim is big business, and those claimants have become rich, on sometimes very weak evidence. They have not named any names, for whatever reason. Except Guiffre, who is particularly unreliable. (I believe the stories about the ex-prince, but I find the Dershowitz allegations less convincing.)
-
@jon-nyc said in The Epstein File:
@Horace said in The Epstein File:
But now that the Trump administration is at the helm, it's all about the coverup and the redactions.
You make it sound like this was all a big TDS-fueled initiative. Trump and his circle did this to themselves by obsessing about it for years and promising the full reveal. This was less than a year ago after all:
It was an obvious political move, and it helped get them into power. There may even have been hopeful intentions behind it, that there would be juicy, politically useful stuff to prosecute or at least publicize in the files. I doubt Kash Patel or Pam Bondi were intimately familiar with what was in the files before they were installed in their positions. Doesn't seem to be much mysterious about any of this. Except the pizza and jerky. I also keep in mind that claiming to be an Epstein victim is big business, and those claimants have become rich, on sometimes very weak evidence. They have not named any names, for whatever reason. Except Guiffre, who is particularly unreliable. (I believe the stories about the ex-prince, but I find the Dershowitz allegations less convincing.)
-
@89th said in The Epstein File:
But the Dow is up 50,000 dollars!
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AwxDnvsSk/?mibextid=wwXIfr
