Trump and your expectations
-
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 19:11 last edited by
I like the J6 pardons. A lot of his base felt that the J6 rioters were singled out and punished far beyond what is usually done. Held without bail for months, investigated and charged YEARS down the line for simple crimes such as trespass, while the Feds let the border and violent crime go to hell...It was obvious that the response was overkill and personal for The Swamp.
Which is why I'm not concerned if he starts tearing down federal buildings next week. The Federal Hobbits work for We The People, and they seem to have forgotten that.
Yes, Trump is Trump. You get hyperbole and sometimes misstatements. But I think the country likes most of his initial actions. Many of those will become law, not EOs, if Johnson can swing it (the process has already started).
And whether you like or dislike what he's doing, at least you know who to cheer or boo, unlike 46.
-
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 19:17 last edited by
I think clear pardons for any non-violent offenders and case by case beyond that. I actually don’t mind the Gaza stuff, I think I see where he’s going. The Canada thing is weird, but as much as I love Blondie and Renauda (in a hunting and fishing kind of way), I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
-
I think clear pardons for any non-violent offenders and case by case beyond that. I actually don’t mind the Gaza stuff, I think I see where he’s going. The Canada thing is weird, but as much as I love Blondie and Renauda (in a hunting and fishing kind of way), I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 19:39 last edited by Renauda 2 Oct 2025, 20:28The Canada thing is weird, but…..I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
Then by all means just withdraw from CUSMA (USMCA) under the terms of Section 34.6 of the Agreement. Or is it that mutually agreed and signed ratified treaties mean nothing to that cosplaying half mad Roman Emporer occupying the WH?
Source: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/USMCA/Text/34_Final_Provisions.pdf
In the meantime tell that repugnant wannbe Caligula to stop with the threats to annex Canada. That is something on which 40 million plus of us do have some say and it is a resounding No and Never!
Trump is repugnant in all respects as is his base of fanatics who support him.
-
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 20:02 last edited by
He's been a bit worse than I expected, but I think it's mostly just sound and fury, signifying nothing, as Old Bill would say. All this wanking off about how American could take Canada and Greenland is so silly.
-
He's been a bit worse than I expected, but I think it's mostly just sound and fury, signifying nothing, as Old Bill would say. All this wanking off about how American could take Canada and Greenland is so silly.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 20:31 last edited by Renauda 2 Oct 2025, 22:08All this wanking off about how American could take Canada and Greenland is so silly.
Talk of annexing Canada might have been just silly in November or early December but since last month its continual repetition is creating nothing other than intense resentment here. No one here is treating it as a joke any more.
-
I think clear pardons for any non-violent offenders and case by case beyond that. I actually don’t mind the Gaza stuff, I think I see where he’s going. The Canada thing is weird, but as much as I love Blondie and Renauda (in a hunting and fishing kind of way), I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 21:39 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Trump and your expectations:
I think clear pardons for any non-violent offenders and case by case beyond that. I actually don’t mind the Gaza stuff, I think I see where he’s going. The Canada thing is weird, but as much as I love Blondie and Renauda (in a hunting and fishing kind of way), I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
Competitors? No, I disagree. We can’t compete with your country. You folks are huge by population, by economics, by manufacturing, by military, by everything. It’s Mr. Trump who’s now making us out to be a “competitor” like it’s a battle or something. To me, our countries have always had a symbiotic respectful relationship.
-
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 21:56 last edited by kluurs 2 Oct 2025, 22:22
He swings for the fences. That's for sure. And in America's history, sometimes that's worked out. I think both friend and foe would like him to STFU at times, but everyone has learned that is not his nature.
I think his fan base appreciates that he communicates with them - a LOT. That was a negative for Biden. If Trump takes a dump and it's a big one, he wants to post about it. If Biden cured cancer, he'd mention it in some dull speech that even Jill wouldn't care about.
As for accomplishments, most Presidents are as good as the people and plans provided to them along with paying debts to those who got him elected. Trump is betting on Elon - because Elon was a winner in the past and bought influence. He's supporting Israel because he has had some major donations there. Project 2025 is moving forward because it is being marketed to him on the basis of benefits - and he trusts the people who created it. "This order will bring about //insert good thought here//, please sign." I think from his team's basis, he's doing great.
Personally, I think Elon is a smart guy - a lucky guy - but as to whether everything he touches turns to gold - I'm not so sure. He's known to be the guy to put it all on the line on one spin of the wheel - ok when you're the one paying for it - but maybe a bit dangerous when a nation and the world are the potential losers. America's founding fathers intended a lot of safeguards. I don't think they knew folks like Trump and Musk - who live their lives pushing boundaries.
ADD: Not wild about his unadulterated affection for tariffs - think that could be the straw that lead to some economic woes - if he isn't willing to back down. His predilection to bash allies - also not a favorite ploy.
It's gonna be an interesting ride - that's for sure.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Trump and your expectations:
I think clear pardons for any non-violent offenders and case by case beyond that. I actually don’t mind the Gaza stuff, I think I see where he’s going. The Canada thing is weird, but as much as I love Blondie and Renauda (in a hunting and fishing kind of way), I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
Competitors? No, I disagree. We can’t compete with your country. You folks are huge by population, by economics, by manufacturing, by military, by everything. It’s Mr. Trump who’s now making us out to be a “competitor” like it’s a battle or something. To me, our countries have always had a symbiotic respectful relationship.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 22:48 last edited by@blondie said in Trump and your expectations:
@LuFins-Dad said in Trump and your expectations:
I think clear pardons for any non-violent offenders and case by case beyond that. I actually don’t mind the Gaza stuff, I think I see where he’s going. The Canada thing is weird, but as much as I love Blondie and Renauda (in a hunting and fishing kind of way), I don’t mind the reminder that even our close allies are still competitors and that not all of our goals line up.
To me, our countries have always had a symbiotic respectful relationship.
That's how I see it, too. 'Murricans are often quick to say something like "Canada wouldn't be anything without America." Yeah, well, the reverse is just as true, and Canada needs to be able to be Canada.
We've been playing the equality of outcome game long enough now that the cracks are starting to show. Things simply don't work like they used to. I'm hoping from this administration we get something like a return to competence as a leadership metric. (I'm not saying the administration is going to supply that in any way—it would be ludicrous to hope for that. Rather, I'm hoping that it's the dismantling of race-based leadership that trickles down.)
Other than that, if I'm able to pick up my car keys, leave my house that's still standing, drive to an existing Starbucks, afford a cup of coffee and then drive back home on roads that haven't been bombed in four years, I'll be very impressed.
-
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 22:54 last edited by
Being Canadian on both sides, I hate to see tensions like this. It seems unnecessary and heavy-handed. While I like results, there's a way to go about it that isn't The Ugly American.
-
All this wanking off about how American could take Canada and Greenland is so silly.
Talk of annexing Canada might have been just silly in November or early December but since last month its continual repetition is creating nothing other than intense resentment here. No one here is treating it as a joke any more.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 22:55 last edited by@Renauda said in Trump and your expectations:
All this wanking off about how American could take Canada and Greenland is so silly.
Talk of annexing Canada might have been just silly in November or early December but since last month its continual repetition is creating nothing other than intense resentment here. No one here is treating it as a joke any more.
Silly wasn't really the right word to use, and I wasn't trying to play down how offensive Trump is being.
God alone knows which peanut gallery he is trying to play to with this rubbish.
-
How did Trump perform so far relative to the expectations you had before the election?
For me, he did better so far than I expected - admittedly that was not a very high barrier.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 23:07 last edited by@Klaus said in Trump and your expectations:
How did Trump perform so far relative to the expectations you had before the election?
Practically perfect in every way.
-
@Klaus said in Trump and your expectations:
How did Trump perform so far relative to the expectations you had before the election?
Practically perfect in every way.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 23:23 last edited by Renauda 2 Oct 2025, 23:29@Copper said in Trump and your expectations:
@Klaus said in Trump and your expectations:
How did Trump perform so far relative to the expectations you had before the election?
Practically perfect in every way.
Seeing that you are being your usual nebulous and passive aggressive self, let me be neighbourly and help you to be more transparent in what you mean by perfect:
https://ia800609.us.archive.org/23/items/VariousWorks/Ferengi-RulesOfAcquisition.pdf
-
@Renauda said in Trump and your expectations:
All this wanking off about how American could take Canada and Greenland is so silly.
Talk of annexing Canada might have been just silly in November or early December but since last month its continual repetition is creating nothing other than intense resentment here. No one here is treating it as a joke any more.
Silly wasn't really the right word to use, and I wasn't trying to play down how offensive Trump is being.
God alone knows which peanut gallery he is trying to play to with this rubbish.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 23:58 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump and your expectations:
God alone knows which peanut gallery he is trying to play to with this rubbish.
Yes, and that's kind of the trouble. Trump always leads with the Barnum and Bailey. I'm happy with 90% of the things he's doing here in the United States. All that DEI and Trans stuff needed to go, but most of that is just a change in vibe not Presidential fiat. And maybe there are whole department of government that need to go--and if they are just fluff they should disappear--but it wouldn't hurt to look things over a bit, there may be some things worth keeping. Who knows? Not Trump and not the American people. But that's all our (that is, America's) problem.
On the other hand, I'm not too happy with Trump's forign policy overall. We have friends and we should keep them, we have enemies and we should beat them, and we should not confuse the two.
-
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 23:58 last edited by
Speaking from Americas missile base, I'm disappointed Trump hasn't offered us Statehood.
Rest is mostly as expected, except for his recent unexpectedly generous offer to redevelop Gaza and rehouse its lovely people.
-
Speaking from Americas missile base, I'm disappointed Trump hasn't offered us Statehood.
Rest is mostly as expected, except for his recent unexpectedly generous offer to redevelop Gaza and rehouse its lovely people.
wrote on 11 Feb 2025, 00:25 last edited by Renauda 2 Nov 2025, 01:37My concern, if I were you, is just what ecactly does Emporer Trumpigula want from Britain? Two weeks ago he praised Starmer after a telephone conversation and implied he could work with him, even become a friend.
-
wrote on 11 Feb 2025, 06:33 last edited by
Loving us enough to buy Turnberry and MacLoed for his golfing downtime portfolio, Trump(CF) probably just wants a teensy weensy bit of love in return.
-
Loving us enough to buy Turnberry and MacLoed for his golfing downtime portfolio, Trump(CF) probably just wants a teensy weensy bit of love in return.
wrote on 11 Feb 2025, 11:28 last edited by@AndyD said in Trump and your expectations:
Loving us enough to buy Turnberry and MacLoed for his golfing downtime portfolio, Trump(CF) probably just wants a teensy weensy bit of love in return.
Somebody should sell him on the idea of building a golf course further south. There's a big area just north of Salisbury that might work really well.
-
He swings for the fences. That's for sure. And in America's history, sometimes that's worked out. I think both friend and foe would like him to STFU at times, but everyone has learned that is not his nature.
I think his fan base appreciates that he communicates with them - a LOT. That was a negative for Biden. If Trump takes a dump and it's a big one, he wants to post about it. If Biden cured cancer, he'd mention it in some dull speech that even Jill wouldn't care about.
As for accomplishments, most Presidents are as good as the people and plans provided to them along with paying debts to those who got him elected. Trump is betting on Elon - because Elon was a winner in the past and bought influence. He's supporting Israel because he has had some major donations there. Project 2025 is moving forward because it is being marketed to him on the basis of benefits - and he trusts the people who created it. "This order will bring about //insert good thought here//, please sign." I think from his team's basis, he's doing great.
Personally, I think Elon is a smart guy - a lucky guy - but as to whether everything he touches turns to gold - I'm not so sure. He's known to be the guy to put it all on the line on one spin of the wheel - ok when you're the one paying for it - but maybe a bit dangerous when a nation and the world are the potential losers. America's founding fathers intended a lot of safeguards. I don't think they knew folks like Trump and Musk - who live their lives pushing boundaries.
ADD: Not wild about his unadulterated affection for tariffs - think that could be the straw that lead to some economic woes - if he isn't willing to back down. His predilection to bash allies - also not a favorite ploy.
It's gonna be an interesting ride - that's for sure.
wrote on 11 Feb 2025, 12:57 last edited by@kluurs said in Trump and your expectations:
If Trump takes a dump and it's a big one, he wants to post about it. If Biden cured cancer, he'd mention it in some dull speech that even Jill wouldn't care about.
POTD
-
He swings for the fences. That's for sure. And in America's history, sometimes that's worked out. I think both friend and foe would like him to STFU at times, but everyone has learned that is not his nature.
I think his fan base appreciates that he communicates with them - a LOT. That was a negative for Biden. If Trump takes a dump and it's a big one, he wants to post about it. If Biden cured cancer, he'd mention it in some dull speech that even Jill wouldn't care about.
As for accomplishments, most Presidents are as good as the people and plans provided to them along with paying debts to those who got him elected. Trump is betting on Elon - because Elon was a winner in the past and bought influence. He's supporting Israel because he has had some major donations there. Project 2025 is moving forward because it is being marketed to him on the basis of benefits - and he trusts the people who created it. "This order will bring about //insert good thought here//, please sign." I think from his team's basis, he's doing great.
Personally, I think Elon is a smart guy - a lucky guy - but as to whether everything he touches turns to gold - I'm not so sure. He's known to be the guy to put it all on the line on one spin of the wheel - ok when you're the one paying for it - but maybe a bit dangerous when a nation and the world are the potential losers. America's founding fathers intended a lot of safeguards. I don't think they knew folks like Trump and Musk - who live their lives pushing boundaries.
ADD: Not wild about his unadulterated affection for tariffs - think that could be the straw that lead to some economic woes - if he isn't willing to back down. His predilection to bash allies - also not a favorite ploy.
It's gonna be an interesting ride - that's for sure.
wrote on 11 Feb 2025, 16:00 last edited by@kluurs said in Trump and your expectations:
Trump is betting on Elon - because Elon was a winner in the past and bought influence.
Well, he didnt always think that way. LOL
From 2022
