Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
936 Posts 19 Posters 19.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #921

    I’ll admit to being a little surprised. It’s not obvious why they should have been retrenching in Q1. The fear of tariff-related inflation and job losses is more of a future concern. You’d also expect higher income people to be more clued in on the risks than the common man.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote last edited by
      #922

      It's unprecedented! It's historical!

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/05/14/trump-tariffs-china-trade/

      Since the inauguration on Jan. 20, Trump administration officials have announced new or revised tariff policies more than 50 times, according to a tally by The Washington Post. (A separate tally by Reed Smith, a law firm, has found about 55 such actions.) Trump has issued more than a dozen tariff-related executive orders, or about one per week ..:

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        I’ll admit to being a little surprised. It’s not obvious why they should have been retrenching in Q1. The fear of tariff-related inflation and job losses is more of a future concern. You’d also expect higher income people to be more clued in on the risks than the common man.

        AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote last edited by
        #923

        @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

        I’ll admit to being a little surprised. It’s not obvious why they should have been retrenching in Q1. The fear of tariff-related inflation and job losses is more of a future concern. You’d also expect higher income people to be more clued in on the risks than the common man.

        Common men fear for the future and tighten belts right away; higher income people say let's buy more and stock up before tariffs get real?

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
          #924

          Sure, but that assumes the common man and the higher income folks both have similar intuitions that tariffs are going to harm them economically in the immediate future.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote last edited by
            #925

            Link to video

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by jon-nyc
              #926

              That’s a lot of emergencies.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 Offline
                89th8 Offline
                89th
                wrote last edited by
                #927

                image.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by
                  #928

                  Corporate greed strikes again.

                  IMG_5176.jpeg

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote last edited by
                    #929

                    Yeah, cause margins don’t exist. Remember when the Republicans were yelling at Biden for blaming inflation on greedy Jewish grocers?

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #930

                      You either die a tariff hawk, or live long enough to embrace greedflation.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote last edited by
                        #931

                        Has Bernie responded?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                          #932

                          I’m sure he’ll be hypocritical too.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #933

                            Cliff Asness comments:

                            I may have mentioned this but we have two economically left-wing parties now that only differ in their preferred pronouns.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              Cliff Asness comments:

                              I may have mentioned this but we have two economically left-wing parties now that only differ in their preferred pronouns.

                              HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote last edited by
                              #934

                              @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                              Cliff Asness comments:

                              I may have mentioned this but we have two economically left-wing parties now that only differ in their preferred pronouns.

                              Yep.

                              At least Trump will make pro capitalism noises though.

                              Education is extremely important.

                              AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                              • HoraceH Horace

                                @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                                Cliff Asness comments:

                                I may have mentioned this but we have two economically left-wing parties now that only differ in their preferred pronouns.

                                Yep.

                                At least Trump will make pro capitalism noises though.

                                AxtremusA Offline
                                AxtremusA Offline
                                Axtremus
                                wrote last edited by
                                #935

                                @Horace said in Trumpenomics:

                                @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                                Cliff Asness comments:

                                I may have mentioned this but we have two economically left-wing parties now that only differ in their preferred pronouns.

                                Yep.

                                At least Trump will make pro capitalism noises though.

                                Perhaps along with also more ICE raids at Walmart locations?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #936

                                  Maybe the phone isn’t really ringing off the hook.

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups