Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
924 Posts 19 Posters 18.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CopperC Copper

    The importer doesn't like tariffs.

    Wow.

    HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #911

    @Copper said in Trumpenomics:

    The importer doesn't like tariffs.

    Wow.

    It's so typical that when you punch someone in the face, they'll just whine about how much it hurt. They have no idea how predictable and tedious that whining is. It happens almost every time someone gets punched in the face.

    Education is extremely important.

    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Copper

      The importer doesn't like tariffs.

      Wow.

      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote last edited by
      #912

      @Copper said in Trumpenomics:

      The importer doesn't like tariffs.

      Wow.

      Copper doesn't like it when people criticise President Trump.

      Wow.

      I was only joking

      1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Horace

        @Copper said in Trumpenomics:

        The importer doesn't like tariffs.

        Wow.

        It's so typical that when you punch someone in the face, they'll just whine about how much it hurt. They have no idea how predictable and tedious that whining is. It happens almost every time someone gets punched in the face.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by Renauda
        #913

        @Horace said in Trumpenomics:

        @Copper said in Trumpenomics:

        The importer doesn't like tariffs.

        Wow.

        It's so typical that when you punch someone in the face, they'll just whine about how much it hurt. They have no idea how predictable and tedious that whining is. It happens almost every time someone gets punched in the face.

        Then just throw him an elbow to the head and keep your eye on the play. Works for me.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • CopperC Offline
          CopperC Offline
          Copper
          wrote last edited by Copper
          #914

          Better than Pete Rose, and still alive. (The rumor is that Mr. Trump got the ban lifted).

          image.png

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #915

            One out of four of those is actually true.

            Welcome home, Edan.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote last edited by
              #916

              Edan should be thanking Copper. Profusely thanking Copper.

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #917

                And the Indians and Pakistanis that are suffering from radiation burns from the nuclear conflict they experienced should thank him too. VP Shillbilly and Copper. Both of them.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #918

                  OMG HE STOPPED FENTANYL!

                  HE WON THE WAR ON DRUGS.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #919

                    This jives with what I gleaned from a call with the CIO of Merrill about a week ago. They have access to all the BofA retail info which touches about a quarter of all consumers.

                    They said that the top 10% of earners’ spending is up 7% yoy while the bottom 90% have been retrenching.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      This jives with what I gleaned from a call with the CIO of Merrill about a week ago. They have access to all the BofA retail info which touches about a quarter of all consumers.

                      They said that the top 10% of earners’ spending is up 7% yoy while the bottom 90% have been retrenching.

                      HoraceH Offline
                      HoraceH Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote last edited by
                      #920

                      No reason to be cautious, with all those factory jobs coming. I'd be spending like a drunken sailor. Like a drunken sailor who was about to get a sweet factory job.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #921

                        I’ll admit to being a little surprised. It’s not obvious why they should have been retrenching in Q1. The fear of tariff-related inflation and job losses is more of a future concern. You’d also expect higher income people to be more clued in on the risks than the common man.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Away
                          AxtremusA Away
                          Axtremus
                          wrote last edited by
                          #922

                          It's unprecedented! It's historical!

                          https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/05/14/trump-tariffs-china-trade/

                          Since the inauguration on Jan. 20, Trump administration officials have announced new or revised tariff policies more than 50 times, according to a tally by The Washington Post. (A separate tally by Reed Smith, a law firm, has found about 55 such actions.) Trump has issued more than a dozen tariff-related executive orders, or about one per week ..:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            I’ll admit to being a little surprised. It’s not obvious why they should have been retrenching in Q1. The fear of tariff-related inflation and job losses is more of a future concern. You’d also expect higher income people to be more clued in on the risks than the common man.

                            AxtremusA Away
                            AxtremusA Away
                            Axtremus
                            wrote last edited by
                            #923

                            @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                            I’ll admit to being a little surprised. It’s not obvious why they should have been retrenching in Q1. The fear of tariff-related inflation and job losses is more of a future concern. You’d also expect higher income people to be more clued in on the risks than the common man.

                            Common men fear for the future and tighten belts right away; higher income people say let's buy more and stock up before tariffs get real?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                              #924

                              Sure, but that assumes the common man and the higher income folks both have similar intuitions that tariffs are going to harm them economically in the immediate future.

                              Only non-witches get due process.

                              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups