Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.1k Posts 20 Posters 41.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1052

    He has China envy. Markets are going to love this.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
      #1053

      Another interesting thing about our growth is most of it is AI capex. The mag 7 are spending over a billion dollars a day on new data center infrastructure.

      That has exceeded consumer spending as a proportion of growth.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote last edited by
        #1054

        Indeed. I stumbled into investing in Palantir in Jan 2023. It’s up 2100% now so I just sold 1/3 of it. The bubble will burst one day, I think their PE ratio is like 650 or something.

        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Away
          AxtremusA Away
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by
          #1055

          https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-02/trump-s-next-job-selling-skeptical-americans-on-his-economy

          USGDP2025.jpeg

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 89th

            Indeed. I stumbled into investing in Palantir in Jan 2023. It’s up 2100% now so I just sold 1/3 of it. The bubble will burst one day, I think their PE ratio is like 650 or something.

            HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #1056

            @89th said in Trumpenomics:

            Indeed. I stumbled into investing in Palantir in Jan 2023. It’s up 2100% now so I just sold 1/3 of it. The bubble will burst one day, I think their PE ratio is like 650 or something.

            Nice. Purchasing individual stocks is an inferior strategy to a well balanced mix of funds, except when it’s not.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by jon-nyc
              #1057

              He’s doubling down on the 1500% cut in drug prices.

              Someone asks Grok to explain:

              A 1500% cut means reducing by 15 times the original price, e.g., a $100 drug becomes -$1400—you'd get paid to take it. Yes, that's a lot, but impossible without negative prices. Likely a misstatement; Trump's actual drug price reductions were more modest, around 1-5% annually.

              Thank you for your attention to this matter.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote last edited by
                #1058

                While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                The Brad

                AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                  AxtremusA Away
                  AxtremusA Away
                  Axtremus
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1059

                  @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                  While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                  Besides, just think about the alternative.
                  Is it still better than the alternative?

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                    While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                    Besides, just think about the alternative.
                    Is it still better than the alternative?

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1060

                    @Axtremus said in Trumpenomics:

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                    While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                    Besides, just think about the alternative.
                    Is it still better than the alternative?

                    Absofuckinglutely.

                    The Brad

                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      @Axtremus said in Trumpenomics:

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                      While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                      Besides, just think about the alternative.
                      Is it still better than the alternative?

                      Absofuckinglutely.

                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1061

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                      @Axtremus said in Trumpenomics:

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                      While I would expect one of the most prominent business people in the world, and in a business that is specifically tied into interest rates and percentages, I would expect better… But… When we are spending 1500% more on drugs than the Phillipines and 400% more than most European countries, I would expect that most of his voters get it…

                      Besides, just think about the alternative.
                      Is it still better than the alternative?

                      Absofuckinglutely.

                      I hate to be pernickity, but could you confirm that when you speak of "the alternative" you are referring to the election of President Kamala Harris, and not the earth being destroyed by a huge fucking meteor?

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1062

                        It’s always interesting to see how much these otherwise intelligent people are willing to debase themselves in front of their entire profession (and be complicit in harming the American economy) all in service to Donald Trump.

                        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1063

                          @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                          75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

                          In fact if you take out healthcare and private education there was a net loss of 43k jobs.

                          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                            75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

                            In fact if you take out healthcare and private education there was a net loss of 43k jobs.

                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1064

                            @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                            @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                            75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

                            In fact if you take out healthcare and private education there was a net loss of 43k jobs.

                            Compare and contrast if you took out new government jobs from 21-25…

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups