Glad the free speech folks are in charge
-
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
Please show me your list of violent actions over the recent past. I’m sure the Minnesota legislators will be on the list. Did they ever determine whether the right winger killed them because they were left wing or was it because they voted for the anti-illegal immigrant measures that the right winger opposed?
The Brad
-
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
Please show me your list of violent actions over the recent past. I’m sure the Minnesota legislators will be on the list. Did they ever determine whether the right winger killed them because they were left wing or was it because they voted for the anti-illegal immigrant measures that the right winger opposed?
I don’t have a list but those woke libtards at the Cato Institute do.
Keep scrolling if you want post 2020 data.
https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
-
I don’t have a list but those woke libtards at the Cato Institute do.
Keep scrolling if you want post 2020 data.
https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I don’t have a list but those woke libtards at the Cato Institute do.
Keep scrolling if you want post 2020 data.
https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
They are looking for specifically politically motivated terrorist attacks which is a different animal than was originally posted and discussed. I also find it interesting that they count OKC, but don’t include 9/11z
-
They did include 9/11 in the first graph. You scrolled too fast.
Most of the terrorism is from that foul memetic complex known as the religion of peace. In later graphs they exclude 9/11 since everything else gets lost in comparison. Their main point is how rare political violence is.
Graph 3 excludes OKC as it zeroes in on 2020-present.
-
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
But not from the guy who matters most, who doubled down on her comments.
It's almost as if he told her what to say.
-
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
-
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
It's nice to see that a "journalist" can advocate the judicial murder of people suffering from mental illness, but the FFC is more concerned with silencing that monstrous threat to democracy Jimmy Kimmel for making jokes they don't like.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
It's nice to see that a "journalist" can advocate the judicial murder of people suffering from mental illness, but the FFC is more concerned with silencing that monstrous threat to democracy Jimmy Kimmel for making jokes they don't like.
-
This post is deleted!
God, I wish I could distinguish between 'edit' and 'reply' in my excitement
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
It's nice to see that a "journalist" can advocate the judicial murder of people suffering from mental illness, but the FFC is more concerned with silencing that monstrous threat to democracy Jimmy Kimmel for making jokes they don't like.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
It's nice to see that a "journalist" can advocate the judicial murder of people suffering from mental illness, but the FFC is more concerned with silencing that monstrous threat to democracy Jimmy Kimmel for making jokes they don't like.
I’m pretty sure that I was the one to point the asshat out and call for his firing. And many conservatives are very outspoken about the administration crossing freedom of speech lines…
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
It's nice to see that a "journalist" can advocate the judicial murder of people suffering from mental illness, but the FFC is more concerned with silencing that monstrous threat to democracy Jimmy Kimmel for making jokes they don't like.
I’m pretty sure that I was the one to point the asshat out and call for his firing. And many conservatives are very outspoken about the administration crossing freedom of speech lines…
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I’m glad that people on the left are back to supporting freedom of speech. It’s a nice change after the last 16 years.
It's nice to see that a "journalist" can advocate the judicial murder of people suffering from mental illness, but the FFC is more concerned with silencing that monstrous threat to democracy Jimmy Kimmel for making jokes they don't like.
I’m pretty sure that I was the one to point the asshat out and call for his firing. And many conservatives are very outspoken about the administration crossing freedom of speech lines…
Right, and where have I, a self-proclaimed member of the rational left, called for censorship of anybody's freedom of speech in the last 16 years?
It's not you or me that's the problem here.
