Glad the free speech folks are in charge
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
My main thought after clicking on that is how much I miss the Twitter character limit.
-
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
-
He has a good point about center left cucks being unable to police their own, as the religious progressive wing of their tribe became dominant and overreaching. Now those same cucks find their courage screaming at the other tribe, as they see the electoral consequences of how repulsive their tribe became. Pretty common, and common sense, perspective on where we're at, actually. Expressed often by the likes of Yglesias and Klein. Though Fat Matt doesn't use the word "cuck", because it is mean.
-
@LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.
@Axtremus said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
@LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.
Do you even have to ask? At least the left is now pretending to care about Free Speech.
-
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
Please show me your list of violent actions over the recent past. I’m sure the Minnesota legislators will be on the list. Did they ever determine whether the right winger killed them because they were left wing or was it because they voted for the anti-illegal immigrant measures that the right winger opposed?
The Brad
-
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Saw that the other day. Shocking how the guys posting this shit miss the irony. Well, more tragic than shocking.
Also interesting what does and doesn’t make the cut when they develop their lists of violent actions over the recent past.
Please show me your list of violent actions over the recent past. I’m sure the Minnesota legislators will be on the list. Did they ever determine whether the right winger killed them because they were left wing or was it because they voted for the anti-illegal immigrant measures that the right winger opposed?
I don’t have a list but those woke libtards at the Cato Institute do.
Keep scrolling if you want post 2020 data.
https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
-
I don’t have a list but those woke libtards at the Cato Institute do.
Keep scrolling if you want post 2020 data.
https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
I don’t have a list but those woke libtards at the Cato Institute do.
Keep scrolling if you want post 2020 data.
https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
They are looking for specifically politically motivated terrorist attacks which is a different animal than was originally posted and discussed. I also find it interesting that they count OKC, but don’t include 9/11z
-
They did include 9/11 in the first graph. You scrolled too fast.
Most of the terrorism is from that foul memetic complex known as the religion of peace. In later graphs they exclude 9/11 since everything else gets lost in comparison. Their main point is how rare political violence is.
Graph 3 excludes OKC as it zeroes in on 2020-present.
