Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Glad the free speech folks are in charge

Glad the free speech folks are in charge

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
208 Posts 15 Posters 6.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    Right on cue.

    President Trump announces he will be supporting legislation to jail people for a mandatory ONE YEAR for burning the American flag in the street

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #122

      What is that quote from a US soldier? Something like:

      I hate you for burning a US flag, but I fought for your right to do so.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by
        #123

        As most of us knew all along, the white house was within its rights to exclude the AP.

        https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-22/white-house-wins-court-ruling-to-exclude-the-associated-press

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #124

          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote last edited by
            #125

            Wait, did he really say it's to stop inciting riots? Like, he's against that now?

            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #126

              He’s also against lying to banks to get a lower interest rate now.

              If it weren’t for double standards….

              Thank you for your attention to this matter.

              89th8 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                He’s also against lying to banks to get a lower interest rate now.

                If it weren’t for double standards….

                89th8 Offline
                89th8 Offline
                89th
                wrote last edited by
                #127

                @jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:

                He’s also against lying to banks to get a lower interest rate now.

                If it weren’t for double standards….

                Double-plated standards! Only the best.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote last edited by
                  #128

                  @jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:

                  Completely out of bounds and a waste of time. This will be struck down in 10 minutes when it actually gets challenged.

                  The Brad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • 89th8 89th

                    Wait, did he really say it's to stop inciting riots? Like, he's against that now?

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote last edited by
                    #129

                    @89th said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:

                    Wait, did he really say it's to stop inciting riots? Like, he's against that now?

                    Are you seriously trying to get me to break the eye rolling world record?

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #130

                      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
                        #131

                        @jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:

                        Presumably this will be written off as Mr. Trump trolling. Because obviously this can't be real. After all, he's been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.

                        I was only joking

                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                          @jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:

                          Presumably this will be written off as Mr. Trump trolling. Because obviously this can't be real. After all, he's been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote last edited by
                          #132

                          @Doctor-Phibes

                          Presumably this will be written off as Mr. Trump trolling.

                          Spitballing and riffing too.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #133

                            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote last edited by
                              #134

                              Imagine that, eh?

                              Elbows up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins Dad
                                wrote last edited by
                                #135

                                Do they even understand that now the employers can’t fire the people thanks to that statement?

                                The Brad

                                AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                • HoraceH Offline
                                  HoraceH Offline
                                  Horace
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #136

                                  I take it as empty fan service, an eye for an eye smite against the dominant culture that was understood by all to impose the economic death penalty on anybody who, for instance, dared to publicly question their employer’s shiny new DEI division.

                                  Yes, it’s all a great shame for those hoping for coherent principle rather than cultural retribution.

                                  Education is extremely important.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                    Do they even understand that now the employers can’t fire the people thanks to that statement?

                                    AxtremusA Away
                                    AxtremusA Away
                                    Axtremus
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #137

                                    @LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.

                                    HoraceH LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                                    • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                      @LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.

                                      HoraceH Offline
                                      HoraceH Offline
                                      Horace
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #138

                                      @Axtremus said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:

                                      @LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.

                                      Sure, empty posturing about employers firing people for high fiving in the break room over Charlie Kirk is an acceptable trade off for the erosion of the culture that gave us DEI offices in our workplaces, along with the understood consequences of criticizing them.

                                      Education is extremely important.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #139

                                        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #140

                                          IMG_7780.jpeg

                                          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups