Glad the free speech folks are in charge
-
It’s more smugness than outrage. I always knew they were lying, including to themselves, when they pretended to be free speech champions.
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
It’s more smugness than outrage. I always knew they were lying, including to themselves, when they pretended to be free speech champions.
It's good that you find such satisfaction in anecdotes that disprove unrealistic idealized positions that your outgroup definitely claims to have.
-
What is that quote from a US soldier? Something like:
I hate you for burning a US flag, but I fought for your right to do so.
-
As most of us knew all along, the white house was within its rights to exclude the AP.
-
He’s also against lying to banks to get a lower interest rate now.
If it weren’t for double standards….
-
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Completely out of bounds and a waste of time. This will be struck down in 10 minutes when it actually gets challenged.
-
@89th said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Wait, did he really say it's to stop inciting riots? Like, he's against that now?
Are you seriously trying to get me to break the eye rolling world record?
-
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Presumably this will be written off as Mr. Trump trolling. Because obviously this can't be real. After all, he's been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
-
@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
Presumably this will be written off as Mr. Trump trolling. Because obviously this can't be real. After all, he's been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Presumably this will be written off as Mr. Trump trolling.
Spitballing and riffing too.
-
Do they even understand that now the employers can’t fire the people thanks to that statement?
The Brad
-
I take it as empty fan service, an eye for an eye smite against the dominant culture that was understood by all to impose the economic death penalty on anybody who, for instance, dared to publicly question their employer’s shiny new DEI division.
Yes, it’s all a great shame for those hoping for coherent principle rather than cultural retribution.
-
Do they even understand that now the employers can’t fire the people thanks to that statement?
@LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.
-
@LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.
@Axtremus said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
@LuFins-Dad ... still better than the alternative, right? Just checking.
Sure, empty posturing about employers firing people for high fiving in the break room over Charlie Kirk is an acceptable trade off for the erosion of the culture that gave us DEI offices in our workplaces, along with the understood consequences of criticizing them.
