The Hegseth "incident."
-
wrote on 3 Dec 2024, 17:50 last edited by
@jon-nyc Detailed article on this. If even half is true, not very good at all.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/pete-hegseths-secret-history
I still think he unqualified, but this additional stuff will make me think that he will soon come out with a statement, "although untrue, it is becoming a distraction to the great work ahead by President Trump, and therefore, I am withdrawing from the nomination."
-
wrote on 3 Dec 2024, 20:05 last edited by
He's a horndawg, no doubt about it.
Makes Jon look like an amateur...
-
wrote on 4 Dec 2024, 22:19 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Dec 2024, 22:25 last edited by
I hope Elbridge Colby replaces him.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:12 last edited by George K 12 May 2024, 14:12
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:16 last edited by
???
Is he confusing the FTC with the CFPB?
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:17 last edited by
Re her post, the reasons he shouldn’t be SecDef have nothing to do with the DoD, and everything to do with Pete Hegseth.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:17 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":
???
Is he confusing the FTC with the CFPB?
Yeah, it's still funny.
-
Re her post, the reasons he shouldn’t be SecDef have nothing to do with the DoD, and everything to do with Pete Hegseth.
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:18 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":
Re her post, the reasons he shouldn’t be SecDef have nothing to do with the DoD, and everything to do with Pete Hegseth.
No, she says that because of unproven allegations, that's disqualifying.
As was posted above, Tower might have been a womanizer, but we would have gotten someone who could run the DoD. He would have been competent.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:23 last edited by
Oh - I also listened to the first part of Megyn Kelly's interview with him.
About the NDA - he claims that her attorneys approached him at a time when his career was taking off and they threatened to expose this affair unless he paid up.
There was a lot of "Jesus is my savior" thrown in too. I gave up after about 15 minutes.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:23 last edited by
I wasn’t summarizing her post, I was disagreeing with it.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 14:23 last edited by
Maybe they should put him in charge of Veteran Affairs.
So many punchlines, so little time.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 16:01 last edited by Copper 12 May 2024, 16:01
In 2023, over 29,000 active-duty troops were sexually assaulted
One about every 20 minutes, about 12% of active duty women each year
At that rate, it would take about 8 years to assault them all.
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2024, 22:17 last edited by
-
wrote on 6 Dec 2024, 01:21 last edited by
-
wrote on 6 Dec 2024, 02:02 last edited by
He's done. I expect a "withdraw my nomination" statement later today.
-
He's done. I expect a "withdraw my nomination" statement later today.
wrote on 6 Dec 2024, 02:06 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":
He's done. I expect a "withdraw my nomination" statement later today.
I agree - though maybe over the weekend.
Although I found the allegations against him to be a bit dodgy - especially the "rape"accusation - his qualifications always seemed to be a bit on the thin side.
Because you've done tours into a war zone, and your "buddies" support you, that's not enough to head a huge government department.
-
wrote on 6 Dec 2024, 02:12 last edited by
Give him a vote.
-
@taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":
He's done. I expect a "withdraw my nomination" statement later today.
I agree - though maybe over the weekend.
Although I found the allegations against him to be a bit dodgy - especially the "rape"accusation - his qualifications always seemed to be a bit on the thin side.
Because you've done tours into a war zone, and your "buddies" support you, that's not enough to head a huge government department.
wrote on 6 Dec 2024, 12:45 last edited by@George-K said in The Hegseth "incident.":
Because you've done tours into a war zone, and your "buddies" support you, that's not enough to head a huge government department.
The reality is he was chosen because of his celebrity more than his combat experience. After all, there are thousands of people with that. And doing Fox stuff definitely doesn't prepare anybody for running a government department.
-
wrote on 6 Dec 2024, 13:09 last edited by
I think a lot of you are forgetting his masters degree in Public Policy and the several books that he’s written detailing the inadequacies of today’s military and list ls multiple ways to fix those inadequacies. Those books are very highly regarded among retired military officers.
It’s a mistake to dismiss him out of hand as being a celebrity pick. Quite frankly, the weekend cohost of Fox & Friends is hardly great celebrity. The guy is a serious military pedagogue.