Kwestions for Kamala
-
@Horace said in Kwestions for Kamala:
Oh, so a flat denial from Trump is actually bad. It's just flat denials from Harris that are fine. I get it.
Indeed if Harris has repeatedly called Trump supporters dumb, then you are right. Until then, Fox playing a clip of Trump in the principal's office denying what he said on video during recess multiple times as proof of what Trump says... is beyond gullible.
-
@Jolly said in Kwestions for Kamala:
Enemy from within, may also refer to the creeping socialism and communism from many on the Far Left.
In Trump's defense... being communist is still illegal here, right? Not that the 50's law is enforced anymore.
-
So what are the odds she goes on Rogan, now?
-
@89th said in Kwestions for Kamala:
Indeed if Harris has repeatedly called Trump supporters dumb, then you are right.
I will take direct implications and painfully obvious attitudes from her vocal supporters, as tantamount to repeated claims. TDS has always been logically incompatible with a graceful or good-faith understanding of those who support Trump.
Until then, Fox playing a clip of Trump in the principal's office denying what he said on video during recess multiple times as proof of what Trump says... is beyond gullible.
I'm not even sure what you're talking about, but I sense you're fixated on a certain framing of something Trump said that he then denied saying in another certain framing. Voters for the Democrat candidate were called "the enemy from within" by Trump? Is that it?
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Kwestions for Kamala:
So what are the odds she goes on Rogan, now?
Oh man that would be fun. Better odds than going on Shapiro
-
@89th said in Kwestions for Kamala:
@LuFins-Dad said in Kwestions for Kamala:
So what are the odds she goes on Rogan, now?
Oh man that would be fun. Better odds than going on Shapiro
No, she actually floated the idea. My guess is that’s over.
-
@Horace said in Kwestions for Kamala:
I'm not even sure what you're talking about, but I sense you're fixated on a certain framing of something Trump said that he then denied saying in another certain framing. Voters for the Democrat candidate were called "the enemy from within" by Trump? Is that it?
Not really... the topic in the interview was Trump saying he would use police, national guard, and what not to take care of American citizens who disagreed with him (far left, communists, anti-tanning spray activists), and so Baier said "oh but Kamala, we asked Trump about this and he denied it" and her (logical) reaction was "hold up bro... you showed the part where he denied it, but didn't show the videos where he actually said it." So my whole point here is... she was right to call out Fox on that lazy approach to defend Donald.
I'd say the same thing if the inverse happened. If Trump was on MSNBC and said that Kamala called college kids stupid, and then MSNBC shows a clip of Kamala saying "I never said that", you'd be like... WTF, show the clip where she did say that, not the lazy excuse/denial clip.
-
Ok, so Trump made a serious claim that he'd call in the military to presumably kill, as enemy combatants, people with left-leaning ideologies. And the serious person takes him serious. While the gullible person believes him when he denies that he seriously said that. Ok then. I guess I'll go ahead and be gullible today. Maybe some Nigerian prince will email me, it's perfect timing for them.
-
@89th said in Kwestions for Kamala:
@Horace said in Kwestions for Kamala:
I'm not even sure what you're talking about, but I sense you're fixated on a certain framing of something Trump said that he then denied saying in another certain framing. Voters for the Democrat candidate were called "the enemy from within" by Trump? Is that it?
Not really... the topic in the interview was Trump saying he would use police, national guard, and what not to take care of American citizens who disagreed with him (far left, communists, anti-tanning spray activists), and so Baier said "oh but Kamala, we asked Trump about this and he denied it" and her (logical) reaction was "hold up bro... you showed the part where he denied it, but didn't show the videos where he actually said it." So my whole point here is... she was right to call out Fox on that lazy approach to defend Donald.
I'd say the same thing if the inverse happened. If Trump was on MSNBC and said that Kamala called college kids stupid, and then MSNBC shows a clip of Kamala saying "I never said that", you'd be like... WTF, show the clip where she did say that, not the lazy excuse/denial clip.
No, the topic goes back to riot/protests if he’s elected.
-
If we see riots in DC similar to what we saw in January, 2017 don’t expect them to end peacefully.
-
It’s like the whole Dictator on Day One claim.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Kwestions for Kamala:
@89th said in Kwestions for Kamala:
@Horace said in Kwestions for Kamala:
I'm not even sure what you're talking about, but I sense you're fixated on a certain framing of something Trump said that he then denied saying in another certain framing. Voters for the Democrat candidate were called "the enemy from within" by Trump? Is that it?
Not really... the topic in the interview was Trump saying he would use police, national guard, and what not to take care of American citizens who disagreed with him (far left, communists, anti-tanning spray activists), and so Baier said "oh but Kamala, we asked Trump about this and he denied it" and her (logical) reaction was "hold up bro... you showed the part where he denied it, but didn't show the videos where he actually said it." So my whole point here is... she was right to call out Fox on that lazy approach to defend Donald.
I'd say the same thing if the inverse happened. If Trump was on MSNBC and said that Kamala called college kids stupid, and then MSNBC shows a clip of Kamala saying "I never said that", you'd be like... WTF, show the clip where she did say that, not the lazy excuse/denial clip.
No, the topic goes back to riot/protests if he’s elected.
Admittedly I didn't watch the full interview. I was just agreeing that Fox's clip of Trump's denial was a lazy way to ignore Trump's rhetoric. And to your point, if the rhetoric was clear in the context of squashing riots, then overall that sounds good to me. I very much rooted for law enforcement punishing (as much as they legally could) those who defaced monuments and other damage during BLM... for sure.
-
Here’s the thing about Trump. He starts in one place, then goes all over the place in his next thoughts, then comes back to point in between. It can be hard to track.
