The Exploding Pagers
-
From what I gather, these were a significantly higher level of threat than before, and no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
wrote on 1 Oct 2024, 22:48 last edited by Axtremus 10 Jan 2024, 22:48@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
... no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
If the attack is "just for show", then the retaliation may also be likewise. Each "look good" domestically, but World War III is avoided anyway.
-
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
wrote on 1 Oct 2024, 22:57 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
Operation Grim Beeper is my favorite.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
Operation Grim Beeper is my favorite.
wrote on 1 Oct 2024, 23:03 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The Exploding Pagers:
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
Operation Grim Beeper is my favorite.
LOL, I hadn’t heard that.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 10:11 last edited by
No, the U.S. Navy didn't intercept a bunch of missiles, but they did get a few.
Notice which destroyers engaged...
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 12:04 last edited by
But wait? I thought the US had no troops in an active war zone?
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 13:03 last edited by
Bwhahahahahaha!
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
... no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
If the attack is "just for show", then the retaliation may also be likewise. Each "look good" domestically, but World War III is avoided anyway.
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 13:47 last edited by Mik 10 Feb 2024, 13:48@Axtremus said in The Exploding Pagers:
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
... no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
If the attack is "just for show", then the retaliation may also be likewise. Each "look good" domestically, but World War III is avoided anyway.
I don't see any evidence that Israel does for show operations. I don't think it will be anything as crude as lobbing missiles, but much more targeted.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 14:08 last edited by
Correction. One casualty. A Palestinian in the West Bank.
***=NSFW content***
click to show -
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 14:31 last edited by
So... we now know where Baghdad Bob went after Iraq fell.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 15:18 last edited by
From SCUD to THUD?
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 15:34 last edited by
Again, I am astonished that the moderators on last night’s debate asked if the candidates would advise Israel against a preemptive strike against Iran. Preemptive? They’ve now had 2 separate strikes launched against them.
-
Again, I am astonished that the moderators on last night’s debate asked if the candidates would advise Israel against a preemptive strike against Iran. Preemptive? They’ve now had 2 separate strikes launched against them.
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 15:48 last edited by@LuFins-Dad UNfortunately (at least from the transcript I read), neither was willing to answer with a yes or no.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 15:49 last edited by
Words like 'preemptive' and 'unprovoked' should simply never be used in relation to the Middle East.
-
@LuFins-Dad UNfortunately (at least from the transcript I read), neither was willing to answer with a yes or no.
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 15:50 last edited byWatch. The transcript never reveals everything about human interaction.
-
Words like 'preemptive' and 'unprovoked' should simply never be used in relation to the Middle East.
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 15:58 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The Exploding Pagers:
Words like 'preemptive' and 'unprovoked' should simply never be used in relation to the Middle East.
Yep. Those trains left the station a thousand years ago.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 16:07 last edited by
The only way it would be appropriate if heavily qualified, like “a preemptive strike on their nuclear program”. Which would be a reasonable question for them both.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 17:02 last edited by
And a reasonable action, IMO. They have ballistic missiles and it's only a matter of time before they put a nuke on one.
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2024, 22:46 last edited by
Joe does not approve. I doubt Bibi cares. It could be just a show too. "Oh, I opposed that strike" wink wink.
-
wrote on 6 Oct 2024, 21:19 last edited by
Lots of fun detail, worth a read if you can get around the paywall.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/10/05/israel-mossad-hezbollah-pagers-nasrallah/
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2024, 13:54 last edited by