The Exploding Pagers
-
Official tally. 181 missiles. Almost all intercepted. No injuries.
@bachophile said in The Exploding Pagers:
Official tally. 181 missiles. Almost all intercepted. No injuries.
Iran did it just for internal consumption then?
-
From what I gather, these were a significantly higher level of threat than before, and no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
The Brad
-
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
The Brad
-
From what I gather, these were a significantly higher level of threat than before, and no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
... no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
If the attack is "just for show", then the retaliation may also be likewise. Each "look good" domestically, but World War III is avoided anyway.
-
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
Operation Grim Beeper is my favorite.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
Operation Grim Beeper is my favorite.
@jon-nyc said in The Exploding Pagers:
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
By the way, do we know what the official name of the pager operation was? I vote for Operation: Reach Out & Touch Someone…
Operation Grim Beeper is my favorite.
LOL, I hadn’t heard that.
-
No, the U.S. Navy didn't intercept a bunch of missiles, but they did get a few.
Notice which destroyers engaged...
-
But wait? I thought the US had no troops in an active war zone?
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
... no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
If the attack is "just for show", then the retaliation may also be likewise. Each "look good" domestically, but World War III is avoided anyway.
@Axtremus said in The Exploding Pagers:
@LuFins-Dad said in The Exploding Pagers:
... no missile attack should ever be excused away because it was unsuccessful.
If the attack is "just for show", then the retaliation may also be likewise. Each "look good" domestically, but World War III is avoided anyway.
I don't see any evidence that Israel does for show operations. I don't think it will be anything as crude as lobbing missiles, but much more targeted.
-
Correction. One casualty. A Palestinian in the West Bank.
***=NSFW content***
click to show -
Again, I am astonished that the moderators on last night’s debate asked if the candidates would advise Israel against a preemptive strike against Iran. Preemptive? They’ve now had 2 separate strikes launched against them.
-
Again, I am astonished that the moderators on last night’s debate asked if the candidates would advise Israel against a preemptive strike against Iran. Preemptive? They’ve now had 2 separate strikes launched against them.
@LuFins-Dad UNfortunately (at least from the transcript I read), neither was willing to answer with a yes or no.
-
@LuFins-Dad UNfortunately (at least from the transcript I read), neither was willing to answer with a yes or no.
Watch. The transcript never reveals everything about human interaction.
-
Words like 'preemptive' and 'unprovoked' should simply never be used in relation to the Middle East.
