Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Garland's Brag

Garland's Brag

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
28 Posts 6 Posters 182 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    @89th said in Garland's Brag:

    @George-K said in Garland's Brag:

    @89th said in Garland's Brag:

    @George-K said in Garland's Brag:

    A guy who came into the Capitol through a broken window and spent 10 minutes in the building after getting pepper-sprayed and then leaving got almost 5 years in prison.

    General Garland, you have a lot to be proud of.

    Are you talking about Barry Ramey?

    https://nypost.com/2024/08/27/us-news/first-rioter-to-enter-capitol-during-jan-6-attack-sentenced-to-over-4-years-in-prison/

    Remember this?

    https://www.fox5ny.com/news/lawyer-in-nypd-police-car-firebombing-sentenced-to-prison

    Not sure what sentencing guidelines are for arson of an empty vehicle, but I'd have no problem if they got more time behind bars.

    For Michael Sparks, you won't find sympathy with me, he was charged with 6 crimes (all make sense to me) and found guilty by a jury. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. 4-5 years makes sense to me, now if it was like 20 years that would seem a bit much.

    I have some sympathy for any protester who later followed a large crowd through open doors into the Capitol, went to the rotunda room, chanted, and left. Sure... but those who led the charge, broke windows, led the breach, chased cops, fought cops, and so forth...all in an effort to stop an election. Zero sympathy. For the 100th time, I'd feel the same if it was Obama or the BLM crew doing it to stop Trump from being elected.

    So you're fine with giving a praying grandmother six months for trespass?

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @Jolly said in Garland's Brag:

    @89th said in Garland's Brag:

    @George-K said in Garland's Brag:

    @89th said in Garland's Brag:

    @George-K said in Garland's Brag:

    A guy who came into the Capitol through a broken window and spent 10 minutes in the building after getting pepper-sprayed and then leaving got almost 5 years in prison.

    General Garland, you have a lot to be proud of.

    Are you talking about Barry Ramey?

    https://nypost.com/2024/08/27/us-news/first-rioter-to-enter-capitol-during-jan-6-attack-sentenced-to-over-4-years-in-prison/

    Remember this?

    https://www.fox5ny.com/news/lawyer-in-nypd-police-car-firebombing-sentenced-to-prison

    Not sure what sentencing guidelines are for arson of an empty vehicle, but I'd have no problem if they got more time behind bars.

    For Michael Sparks, you won't find sympathy with me, he was charged with 6 crimes (all make sense to me) and found guilty by a jury. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. 4-5 years makes sense to me, now if it was like 20 years that would seem a bit much.

    I have some sympathy for any protester who later followed a large crowd through open doors into the Capitol, went to the rotunda room, chanted, and left. Sure... but those who led the charge, broke windows, led the breach, chased cops, fought cops, and so forth...all in an effort to stop an election. Zero sympathy. For the 100th time, I'd feel the same if it was Obama or the BLM crew doing it to stop Trump from being elected.

    So you're fine with giving a praying grandmother six months for trespass?

    LOL you mean the lady who self-titled herself as "the praying grandma" who trespassed in the Capitol and then made fun of the courts and profited off of denouncing the legal system (probably not the best idea when you're still on trial)? Oh and her "6 months" was confined to her own home.

    So yes, the answer is yes I'm cool with that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      @George-K said in Garland's Brag:

      @89th said in Garland's Brag:

      Not sure what sentencing guidelines are for arson of an empty vehicle

      https://www.lawinfo.com/resources/criminal-defense/sentencing/sentencing-statistics/how-much-time-will-i-serve-for-arson.html

      Under federal law, an arson conviction can carry up to 10 years in federal prison, even if no one was hurt and the defendant set fire to their own property.

      The average sentence for arson in New York is 74 months. The average.

      Now, 'splain me how this lawyer got 12 months.

      The lawyer who lit the car on fire got 15 months. The prosecutor asked for 18-24 months, because of a plea deal. So I guess, plea deal is the answer to your question?

      George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      @89th said in Garland's Brag:

      The prosecutor asked for 18-24 months, because of a plea deal. So I guess, plea deal is the answer to your question?

      Ask yourself why the prosecutor asked for 20% of the usual sentence for arson.

      Not to mention arson of a police car.

      Why sentenced to ONLY $30K restitution for a police car?

      During a riot during which other Molotov cocktails they distributed.

      Was there a plea deal?

      Yeah, the terrorism charge was dropped. Firebombing during a riot - dropped.

      Sorry, we'll have to disagree. Sparks' crime doesn't even come close to this.

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      89th8 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girl
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        https://www.wlky.com/article/louisville-man-sentenced-storming-us-capitol-dan-wilson/62000598

        Dan Wilson was sentenced to five years in prison.

        He told a judge that he regrets entering the Capitol that day but said he had good intentions, believing the country was in turmoil.

        and

        The judge said there is “no question" that Wilson intended to interfere with the congressional certification of Biden's 2020 electoral victory over Trump.

        “He's not being punished for what he said that day. His comments are reflexive of his intent,” the judge said.

        (BTW, the judge was appointed by President Trump. Gosh darn those biased judges. Those not appointed by him are bias against him. Those that are appointed by him are bias against him. He just can't win.

        Isn't it just possible if we take off our TDS hats on both sides and realize the just maybe, the punishment DOES fit the crime??)

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          No, I don't care who they are appointed by, although I suspect the Dem judges may be harder in sentencing.

          I think a lot of it is a reaction to challenge of authority.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girl
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

            But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

              If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

              But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              @taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:

              If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

              But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

              Isn't that what I said?

              The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              taiwan_girlT Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
              • JollyJ Jolly

                @taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:

                If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

                But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

                Isn't that what I said?

                The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...

                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                @Jolly said in Garland's Brag:

                @taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:

                If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

                But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

                Isn't that what I said?

                The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...

                Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were saying that there was some sort of judge conspiracy against President Trump and his followers, especially as relating to Jan 6

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  I think there is a Jan 6 bias, no doubt about it.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:

                    If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

                    But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

                    Isn't that what I said?

                    The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...

                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    @Jolly said in Garland's Brag:

                    @taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:

                    If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.

                    But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............

                    Isn't that what I said?

                    The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...

                    There's an old saw that if you find that absolutely everybody you work with thinks you're an asshole, maybe they're not the problem.

                    I was only joking

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG George K

                      @89th said in Garland's Brag:

                      The prosecutor asked for 18-24 months, because of a plea deal. So I guess, plea deal is the answer to your question?

                      Ask yourself why the prosecutor asked for 20% of the usual sentence for arson.

                      Not to mention arson of a police car.

                      Why sentenced to ONLY $30K restitution for a police car?

                      During a riot during which other Molotov cocktails they distributed.

                      Was there a plea deal?

                      Yeah, the terrorism charge was dropped. Firebombing during a riot - dropped.

                      Sorry, we'll have to disagree. Sparks' crime doesn't even come close to this.

                      89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      @George-K said in Garland's Brag:

                      @89th said in Garland's Brag:

                      The prosecutor asked for 18-24 months, because of a plea deal. So I guess, plea deal is the answer to your question?

                      Ask yourself why the prosecutor asked for 20% of the usual sentence for arson.

                      Not to mention arson of a police car.

                      Why sentenced to ONLY $30K restitution for a police car?

                      During a riot during which other Molotov cocktails they distributed.

                      Was there a plea deal?

                      Yeah, the terrorism charge was dropped. Firebombing during a riot - dropped.

                      Sorry, we'll have to disagree. Sparks' crime doesn't even come close to this.

                      I'm not comparing the two sentences. There are a billion examples of sentences that are too harsh relative to ones that are too light. Now, does it help that the lawyer plead guilty and showed remorse, whereas Sparks denies the crimes, taunted the court, and profited off of it? Not the smartest goose in the MAGgle.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Justice should not depend upon the defendant's attitude, should it?

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups