"Vance is Weird"

[George K]

[jon-nyc]

Now do 'coup'.

[LuFins Dad]

[George K]

https://x.com/search?q=vance weird&src=typed_query

[Doctor Phibes]

TBH I’d rather be weird than a bit of a knob.

And JD Vance is a bit of a knob.

[Jolly]

The Dems must think average Americans are weird...

[Axtremus]

@Jolly said in "Vance is Weird":

The Dems must think average Americans are weird...

From "Vance is weird" to "[the] average Americans are weird" ... how do you make that logical leap?

[LuFins Dad]

[jon-nyc]

So someone can’t just be weird? It’s weirdest or nada?

[LuFins Dad]

The statement that Vance made that they are referencing, was regarding establishing laws and a civic framework that prioritized parents having children. Promoting a society that didn’t view children and working parents as impositions or obstacles.

Instead, we promote lifestyles and choices that are self limiting to our country and society’s future. Which is weird, again?

[George K]

@jon-nyc said in "Vance is Weird":

So someone can’t just be weird?

According to Harry Sisson, no.

[George K]

They really need to mix it up a bit.

I mean, don't send the same talking points to EVERYONE, ffs.

[jon-nyc]

[Mik]

[taiwan_girl]

Just politics. Try and find something "catchy" and simple that will go viral. Why do you think President Trump comes up with nicknames for his opponents? Then you have people who support him rolling out those nicknames.

[Jolly]

@taiwan_girl said in "Vance is Weird":

Just politics. Try and find something "catchy" and simple that will go viral. Why do you think President Trump comes up with nicknames for his opponents? Then you have people who support him rolling out those nicknames.

No, it's not. You're missing the obvious. Going viral implies that one person does something that catches on very quickly and becomes ubiquitous.

Didn't happen here. This was multiple people within a very short period of time, using the same description. There is no way that is coincidence or something going viral. This is a case of a campaign-generated talking point.

What makes this what it is, is the complicit involvement of the legacy media, crafting Kamala's message to the public, amounting to millions of dollars of free negative campaign ads masquerading as news or news commentary.

Now, is that ethical journalism? Is it helping to rig an election?

[Axtremus]

@Jolly is just sulking over the fact that the Democrats are more effective at earning the support of the free press.

Pro tip: keep calling them "lamestream" or other derogatory nicknames will not endear them more.

[George K]

@Axtremus said in "Vance is Weird":

Pro tip: keep calling them "lamestream" or other derogatory nicknames will not endear them more.

What a weird thing to say...

[Jolly]

@George-K said in "Vance is Weird":

@Axtremus said in "Vance is Weird":

Pro tip: keep calling them "lamestream" or other derogatory nicknames will not endear them more.

What a weird thing to say...

Think I used the term "legacy". How'd we get from there to lamestream?

I guess thou dost protest too loudly. It's obvious what happened. Wonder why they can't admit to that simple observation?

[LuFins Dad]

In all fairness, some Republicans can be a little weird…