Vance?
-
wrote on 16 Jul 2024, 13:40 last edited by
From the RWEC: "A disappointing choice"
As expected, Donald Trump announced today that J.D. Vance will he his running mate. I think that is a bad decision for a number of reasons.
At 39, Vance is too young for the role. And with less than two years in the Senate as his only political office, he has nowhere near the experience that a vice president should bring to a ticket.
Vance, who is unknown to the general public, won’t bring Trump a single new vote. In fact, there is no reason to think that he is any kind of political powerhouse: in his only race, he ran far behind the other statewide Republican candidates in Ohio.
Further, Vance’s political views are, in almost a literal sense, half-baked. He is still evolving. Thus, he denounced Trump viciously in 2016, while now he is an acolyte. In 2016, it was dumb of Vance to describe Trump as an “idiot,” as “noxious,” as one who is either “a cynical asshole” or “America’s Hitler,” just as it is dumb for Democrats to say the same things today. Vance’s never-Trumpism showed poor judgment, and 2016 is not exactly ancient history. Vance also converted to Catholicism in 2019. Nothing wrong with that; on the contrary, I applaud it. But we don’t need a president or vice president who is still on a voyage of self-discovery.
I am also suspicious of Vance on foreign policy. In tone, he strikes me as something close to an isolationist. He attacks the Iraq war in a manner barely distinguishable from leftists, and his statement that “I got to be honest with you, I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another,” is flippant at best. The world needs a strong America; I am not sure Vance agrees.
In short, while Vance is a bright guy and a pretty solid conservative, I don’t think he is anywhere near ready for prime time, and I don’t think he makes a perceptible contribution to the ticket. Trump had a number of much better choices available, and I think his selecting Vance reflects the poor judgment to which Trump is occasionally prone.
-
wrote on 16 Jul 2024, 16:32 last edited by
I think Trump picked Vance for several reasons:
- He's good friends with Don, Jr. They have hunted and fished together in the past. His private nature is known.
- Politically, he's MAGA.
- His backstory is a classic American success story.
- The campaign has already said they are going to use him traditional blue-collar areas, along with some suburban campaigning. Think Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan.
- Vance is bright, but can be pugnacious when dealing with the press. I think Trump likes that.
-
I think Trump picked Vance for several reasons:
- He's good friends with Don, Jr. They have hunted and fished together in the past. His private nature is known.
- Politically, he's MAGA.
- His backstory is a classic American success story.
- The campaign has already said they are going to use him traditional blue-collar areas, along with some suburban campaigning. Think Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan.
- Vance is bright, but can be pugnacious when dealing with the press. I think Trump likes that.
-
wrote on 16 Jul 2024, 17:02 last edited by
I'm 5 foot 7 and I'm more of a man than you'll ever be. Just ask my hair stylist.
-
wrote on 16 Jul 2024, 18:08 last edited by
The 5’7 thing was a very successful troll by someone familiar with SEO.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2024, 20:15 last edited by
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2024, 20:45 last edited by
For the life of me I cannot see why anyone would think Pete, an unpopular mayor of a small city, would be a good president
-
For the life of me I cannot see why anyone would think Pete, an unpopular mayor of a small city, would be a good president
-
-
-
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2024, 00:38 last edited by
Interesting. Out on the deck having a discussion with my bride about the crime structure in Middletown when I was growing up and how it differed from today. I wonder how much Vance knows about it since it was before his time.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2024, 00:47 last edited by
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2024, 01:25 last edited by
That’s now. When I was over there it was all mobbed due to the union up so nobody really got too out of line. Now it’s largely street gang related.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2024, 04:18 last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2024, 21:06 last edited by
-
wrote on 23 Jul 2024, 14:26 last edited by
Yes we're already long past the point of being educated that one does not have to be white to be a white supremacist. Mostly, in order not to be a white supremacist, you have to vote Democrat. It's a color-blind concept, except for that first word in "white supremacist". That's definitely a color. Other than that, color has nothing to do with it.
-
wrote on 23 Jul 2024, 15:52 last edited by
And they wonder why people could care less about their BS...
-
wrote on 24 Jul 2024, 16:44 last edited by
