June and September Presidential debates called for
-
I might actually watch these. I'd say there's a significant chance of something highly entertaining and/or excessively cringe-worthy occurring from either one or both of these characters.
-
@89th said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
It's sad they have to cut microphones
Hence the need for trapdoors and shock collars.
Lord knows, we can't have one candidate call the other a "clown," or a "buffoon" to his face.
-
It would possibly be more appropriate to have a naughty chair. They could electrify it for a repeat offence.
-
@Mik said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
… people only behave because technology forces them to.
Tech evolution:
Sticks & stones —> whips —> guns —> tasers/shock collars —> surveillance tech (networked cameras) —> drugs/medications —> neural implants
-
-
@taiwan_girl said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
greed to accept the rules and format of the debate, as outlined in letters sent to the campaigns by the network in May.
What about the drug tests?
-
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
-
They’d be good choices but Trump considers Megan Kelly as anti-Trump and Brett is probably prohibited from moonlighting with CNN.
-
@jon-nyc said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
Rachel Maddow and Sean Hannity