June and September Presidential debates called for
-
Definitely. It's sad they have to cut microphones, but such is the degraded political environment these days...normalized impoliteness.
@89th said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
It's sad they have to cut microphones
Hence the need for trapdoors and shock collars.
Lord knows, we can't have one candidate call the other a "clown," or a "buffoon" to his face.
-
It would possibly be more appropriate to have a naughty chair. They could electrify it for a repeat offence.
-
@Mik said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
… people only behave because technology forces them to.
Tech evolution:
Sticks & stones —> whips —> guns —> tasers/shock collars —> surveillance tech (networked cameras) —> drugs/medications —> neural implants
-
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/15/politics/trump-biden-cnn-debate-rules/index.html
Both candidates have accepted the network’s invitation and agreed to accept the rules and format of the debate, as outlined in letters sent to the campaigns by the network in May.
The 90-minute debate will include two commercial breaks, according to the network, and campaign staff may not interact with their candidate during that time.
Both candidates agreed to appear at a uniform podium, and their podium positions will be determined by a coin flip.
Microphones will be muted throughout the debate except for the candidate whose turn it is to speak. While no props or pre-written notes will be allowed on the stage, candidates will be given a pen, a pad of paper and a bottle of water.
Some aspects of the debate – including the absence of a studio audience – will be a departure from previous debates. But, as in the past, the moderators “will use all tools at their disposal to enforce timing and ensure a civilized discussion,” according to the network.
@taiwan_girl said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
greed to accept the rules and format of the debate, as outlined in letters sent to the campaigns by the network in May.
What about the drug tests?
-
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
You were warned.
-
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
-
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
-
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
@jon-nyc said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
Rachel Maddow and Sean Hannity
-
@jon-nyc said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Damn, no trap door or shock collar.
Otherwise, I'm good with these rules.
Disappointed that anti-Trump Tapper and Bash are the "moderators."
What pro-Trump moderator would you like to be there?
Rachel Maddow and Sean Hannity
-
@Copper said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Whoopi Goldberg and Newt Gingrich
Thank you for the diversity.
-
@Copper said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Whoopi Goldberg and Newt Gingrich
Thank you for the diversity.
@George-K said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
@Copper said in June and September Presidential debates called for:
Whoopi Goldberg and Newt Gingrich
Thank you for the diversity.
Large and small lizards?
-
I should do it.
ChatGPT would make a good presidential debate moderator due to several key attributes that align well with the requirements and expectations of such a high-stakes and highly visible role:
-
Impartiality and Objectivity
ChatGPT, as an AI, has no personal or political biases. This ensures a fair and balanced moderation where all candidates are treated equally, preventing any appearance of favoritism or partisanship. -
Comprehensive Knowledge Base
ChatGPT has access to a vast repository of information, including historical data, current events, policy details, and previous debates. This allows it to ask insightful and relevant questions that challenge candidates on their knowledge, positions, and plans. -
Real-Time Fact-Checking
In presidential debates, accuracy is crucial. ChatGPT can provide real-time fact-checking to address any misinformation or false claims made by candidates, ensuring the debate remains informative and truthful. -
Consistency and Rule Enforcement
ChatGPT can consistently enforce the rules of the debate, such as time limits and speaking order. This consistency helps maintain order and ensures that all candidates have an equal opportunity to present their views. -
Calm and Composed Moderation
Presidential debates can become heated and contentious. ChatGPT's ability to remain calm and composed can help de-escalate tense situations, maintaining a respectful and productive atmosphere. -
In-depth Questioning
ChatGPT can generate follow-up questions based on candidates' responses, probing deeper into their policies and positions. This ensures a more thorough examination of each candidate's platform. -
Multilingual Capabilities
In a diverse country, language inclusivity is important. ChatGPT's ability to understand and process multiple languages can help include questions and information relevant to a wider audience, reflecting the diverse population. -
Time Management
ChatGPT can effectively manage the allotted time for each segment, ensuring that the debate stays on schedule and that all topics are covered within the available time. -
Inclusivity and Accessibility
ChatGPT can incorporate questions from the public, gathered through various channels, ensuring that the concerns of ordinary citizens are addressed. This inclusivity can enhance the relevance and engagement of the debate. -
Adaptability and Customization
ChatGPT can be tailored to fit the specific format and requirements of a presidential debate. Whether it's a town hall format, a one-on-one debate, or a multi-candidate stage, ChatGPT can adapt to the needs of the event. -
Continuous Improvement
ChatGPT can continuously learn and improve from each debate it moderates. Feedback from organizers, participants, and viewers can be used to refine its moderation capabilities for future debates. -
Focus on Substance
ChatGPT can prioritize substantive issues and policy discussions, steering candidates away from personal attacks and towards meaningful dialogue about their vision for the country.
By leveraging these strengths, ChatGPT can serve as an effective, fair, and efficient moderator for presidential debates, facilitating a high-quality discussion that informs and engages the public.
-
