Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. "Hay AOC! Say the word!"

"Hay AOC! Say the word!"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
32 Posts 10 Posters 332 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RenaudaR Renauda

    There’s no genocide of Palestinians taking place. Why should she say genocide when it is not?

    The only ones promoting anything resembling genocide is the leadership of Hamas and presumably, their followers.

    MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @Renauda well, since genocide is their oft-stated goal….

    "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

    1 Reply Last reply
    • RenaudaR Renauda

      There’s no genocide of Palestinians taking place. Why should she say genocide when it is not?

      The only ones promoting anything resembling genocide is the leadership of Hamas and presumably, their followers.

      George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      @Renauda said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

      There’s no genocide of Palestinians taking place. Why should she say genocide when it is not?

      Jesus, haven't you been paying attention? Every right-thinking person knows that "Palestinians" are being herded up, hauled off and summarily executed. To deny genocide makes you a Zionist fascist. Get with the program, please.

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote on last edited by Renauda
        #6

        That’s just not true.

        A rocking chair Bonapartist perhaps but certainly not a Zionist or fascist.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          You feel some sympathy for Dr. Frankenstein when his monster finally catches up to him in the book. You really do.

          I’m just not feeling it here. Quite the opposite, in fact.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Not going to lie, she looks kinda hot when she's angry. I'm surprised there isn't any security around her besides her wet noodle partner.

            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 89th

              Not going to lie, she looks kinda hot when she's angry. I'm surprised there isn't any security around her besides her wet noodle partner.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @89th on the crazy/ hot axis there’s just too much of the crazy.

              Not Boebert hot/crazy but still.

              But remember that Boebert has the GILF thing going so there’s that.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 Offline
                89th8 Offline
                89th
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Ha good point. You know, SNL should do a skit where the President is giving the state of the union, and congress is divided not by party, but by hot/crazy.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                  The Brad

                  Aqua LetiferA 89th8 Doctor PhibesD 3 Replies Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                    I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                    Aqua LetiferA Offline
                    Aqua LetiferA Offline
                    Aqua Letifer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                    I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                    AI will do us no favors there.

                    Please love yourself.

                    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                    • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                      @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                      I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                      AI will do us no favors there.

                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @Aqua-Letifer said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                      @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                      I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                      AI will do us no favors there.

                      Oh man. One of my Twitter follows is this guy from BBC Verify. The amount of crap out there is absurd, on both sides. It doesn’t even have to be AI generated. Present videos from Syria and claim it’s Jews attacking Gaza…That kind of crap.

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                        I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                        89th8 Offline
                        89th8 Offline
                        89th
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                        I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                        tl;dr

                        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                          I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                          #15

                          @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                          I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                          It's hard to know, but I wonder how different it used to be in the good old days. There were plenty of people unwilling to accept how awful Hitler, Stalin etc. were in the 30's, and lefties in particular were more than willing to overlook the purges going on in the Soviet Union. Another example, British Communists went overnight from protesting against the war against Germany (during the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact) to 'SECOND FRONT NOW' immediately after the USSR were invaded, and prior to WW2 many on the right tacitly supported Hitler as being an enemy of communism.

                          Also, the British press at least were frequently happy to toe the establishment line and not make the unwashed masses aware of what was actually going on.

                          The idea that the great mass of people used to have wonderful critical-thinking skills is nice, but I'm not sure it stands up to scrutiny.

                          I was only joking

                          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                          • 89th8 89th

                            @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                            I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                            tl;dr

                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @89th said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                            @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                            I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                            tl;dr

                            Lol

                            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                              I really wish this generation was better at critical thinking. Instead, they just take a look at surface details and don’t dig any deeper. It’s allowing them to be led and manipulated in dangerous ways.

                              It's hard to know, but I wonder how different it used to be in the good old days. There were plenty of people unwilling to accept how awful Hitler, Stalin etc. were in the 30's, and lefties in particular were more than willing to overlook the purges going on in the Soviet Union. Another example, British Communists went overnight from protesting against the war against Germany (during the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact) to 'SECOND FRONT NOW' immediately after the USSR were invaded, and prior to WW2 many on the right tacitly supported Hitler as being an enemy of communism.

                              Also, the British press at least were frequently happy to toe the establishment line and not make the unwashed masses aware of what was actually going on.

                              The idea that the great mass of people used to have wonderful critical-thinking skills is nice, but I'm not sure it stands up to scrutiny.

                              RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote on last edited by Renauda
                              #17

                              @Doctor-Phibes

                              I don’t believe either that the critical thinking skills of the vast majority of the population were any better in past than now. Common folk in past - and by past I mean the last 200 hundred years - may have had a more practical savy with everyday manual tasks or skilled trades, but for more abstract endeavours such as political discourse, I don’t think they saw the world or understood it much differently than people today. As for the intelligentsia, it too grappled with pretty much the same opposing ‘isms and multitude of ideas as people now. My own grandparents’ generation produced defenders of democratic institutions and liberalism like Churchill and Attlee as well as FDR, Truman and Eisenhower. That generation also produced the extremist populism of Marxism-Leninism and fascism that spawned the unthinkable brutality of totalitarian governance and global war.

                              Elbows up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                The thing that generally gets overlooked when people talk about the book 1984 is that the proles really don't give a shit. Orwell must have based that idea on something

                                I was only joking

                                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                  The thing that generally gets overlooked when people talk about the book 1984 is that the proles really don't give a shit. Orwell must have based that idea on something

                                  RenaudaR Offline
                                  RenaudaR Offline
                                  Renauda
                                  wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                  #19

                                  @Doctor-Phibes

                                  Likely. I would add that left alone, the outlook of the vast majority of people can be described as laissez-faire libertarian; that is, at least until such time that they are not either laissez-faire or libertarian.

                                  Elbows up!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins Dad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @Renauda @Doctor-Phibes I would use your arguments as support for mine. The very fact that we have these examples in the past and so many fail to pay heed suggests to me that the problem is worse.

                                    The Brad

                                    RenaudaR Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
                                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                      @Renauda @Doctor-Phibes I would use your arguments as support for mine. The very fact that we have these examples in the past and so many fail to pay heed suggests to me that the problem is worse.

                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @LuFins-Dad

                                      I would agree that it is on a larger scale than in past partly because populations have grown. I would also maintain that the speed, scope and accessibility of mass communications has shrunk the world and facilitated more people to become engaged be it productively or, unfortunately, destructively.

                                      Elbows up!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                        @Renauda @Doctor-Phibes I would use your arguments as support for mine. The very fact that we have these examples in the past and so many fail to pay heed suggests to me that the problem is worse.

                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                        #22

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in "Hay AOC! Say the word!":

                                        @Renauda @Doctor-Phibes I would use your arguments as support for mine. The very fact that we have these examples in the past and so many fail to pay heed suggests to me that the problem is worse.

                                        I suspect the problem is much the same. The main difference is that nowadays we get to hear what every Tom Dick or Harry thinks about everything, whereas in the past we didn't have the opportunity to listen to their nonsense.

                                        I was only joking

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Offline
                                          MikM Offline
                                          Mik
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          Yes. These folks did not have a platform before.

                                          "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups