Why didn’t Trump pardon the nonviolent January 6th protesters?

[Copper]

@Renauda said in Why didn’t Trump pardon the nonviolent January 6th protesters?:

Don’t care what the White House Hustorical Historical Assoc calls it and even less what the Washington Post writes about it.

I don’t believe you do either..

I’m sorry, but you obviously know nothing about this. This is important historical research we do here, please be more careful with the facts.

[LuFins Dad]

It was Carter’s blanket pardon of the draft evaders that I was thinking of as the precedent. These guys weren’t identified, but identification was possible and ongoing. Similar to January 6th. They hadn’t been adjudicated yet… Trump could have easily issued some general pardons on very specific guidelines.

[Renauda]

@Copper said in Why didn’t Trump pardon the nonviolent January 6th protesters?:

@Renauda said in Why didn’t Trump pardon the nonviolent January 6th protesters?:

Don’t care what the White House Hustorical Historical Assoc calls it and even less what the Washington Post writes about it.

I don’t believe you do either..

I’m sorry, but you obviously know nothing about this. This is important historical research we do here, please be more careful with the facts.

Like I already told you, I don’t believe you do either. That shouldn’t be too difficult for you to comprehend.

[Doctor Phibes]

@LuFins-Dad said in Why didn’t Trump pardon the nonviolent January 6th protesters?:

It was Carter’s blanket pardon of the draft evaders that I was thinking of as the precedent. These guys weren’t identified, but identification was possible and ongoing. Similar to January 6th. They hadn’t been adjudicated yet… Trump could have easily issued some general pardons on very specific guidelines.

A cynic might suggest that it is in Trump's interest for them to become martyrs.

[jon-nyc]

You spelled ’realist’ wrong.

[Copper]

@Renauda said in Why didn’t Trump pardon the nonviolent January 6th protesters?:

Like I already told you, I don’t believe you do either. That shouldn’t be too difficult for you to comprehend.

The difference is that I am right and you are wrong.

As always.

Just accept it and move on, you are embarrassing yourself.

[Renauda]

@Copper

I just forget who posted this years ago in response to you. I thought it was an accurate statement then and still do to this day:

Cu > Pb

Happy Christmas.

[Horace]

That reminds me of how my grade school math teacher attempted to get the kids to remember what > and < mean. They said it was like an open mouth where the smaller number was eating the larger one. So dumb. At some point I realized that the reason the symbol was fashioned that way, is because on one side is a large space between the lines, and on the other side the lines converge to down to zero space. Large to small. The number on the large side of the symbol is the larger number. It's too bad I wasn't advanced enough as a public intellectual at the time to educate my teacher on the subject. And now, it's too late. That teacher is no longer with us. Probably went to their grave still propagating that bit of nonsense, infecting the minds of the youths, teaching them anti-thought and leading them to become progressives. Sad.

[Renauda]

Yep, it’s a sad Xmas for all.

[89th]

To answer your question @LuFins-Dad it’s simple. To pardon them would’ve made it seem like he was with them, he was trying to play both sides that day and this would’ve undercut his narrative of not being involved once he realized what he had in fact incited.