Hamas attacks Israel
-
To say that “continued military operations” are a red line is basically giving them an ultimatum to cease hostilities.
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 00:41 last edited by Renauda@jon-nyc said in Hamas attacks Israel:
To say that “continued military operations” are a red line is basically giving them an ultimatum to cease hostilities.
That’s how I read it as well. I understand also that in the last 12 hours Israeli jets air struck Aleppo airport in Syria. A good thing that the 2nd USN Carrier Group is en route.
This is shaping up to be a multiple party hot one. -
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 01:26 last edited by
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 01:27 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Hamas attacks Israel:
That deployment has been scheduled for months. Duration is six months.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 01:45 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Hamas attacks Israel:
Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night stays these …
Ah, never mind.
Yeah. Look how that worked out for Hitler and Napoleon.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 02:05 last edited by
True, by postponing 36 hours they’ll avoid a nasty Russian winter in Gaza City.
Actually I imagine they’re postponing for humanitarian reasons (it’s hard to evacuate 1MM people in a day along two roads) but don’t want to say as much.
-
True, by postponing 36 hours they’ll avoid a nasty Russian winter in Gaza City.
Actually I imagine they’re postponing for humanitarian reasons (it’s hard to evacuate 1MM people in a day along two roads) but don’t want to say as much.
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 02:10 last edited by George K@jon-nyc said in Hamas attacks Israel:
True, by postponing 36 hours they’ll avoid a nasty Russian winter in Gaza City.
I imagine they’re postponing for humanitarian reasons (it’s hard to evacuate 1MM people in a day along two roads) but don’t want to say as much.
Good point.
That was kind of … optimistic?
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 02:15 last edited by jon-nyc
The American General that commented on it said two things: (1) were not going to Monday morning quarterback their tactical decisions; and 2) but that’s a tall order.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 03:06 last edited by
-
True, by postponing 36 hours they’ll avoid a nasty Russian winter in Gaza City.
Actually I imagine they’re postponing for humanitarian reasons (it’s hard to evacuate 1MM people in a day along two roads) but don’t want to say as much.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 14:25 last edited by
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 14:29 last edited by
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 14:37 last edited by
Yeah, no thanks.
Remember when snuff films were a lucrative thing? Now they are free on social media.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 15:11 last edited by
Jesus.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 15:15 last edited by
Poking the eyes out of a corpse? I couldn't get too much farther.
Hard to fathom the environment that breeds that kind of hate.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 15:23 last edited by
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 16:49 last edited by
When I see how fast and massive missiles and rockets can be fired, it makes me wonder what would happen if such an attack was against an aircraft carrier. Could the carrier group really pick off all the incoming?
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 16:52 last edited by Mik
Easily. Thats what the supporting warships are for.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 16:53 last edited by Jolly
IF.
If you have the right weapons and enough of them. What Hamas has?
Likely not.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 17:33 last edited by
Success against an aircraft carrier would be a bad idea from the get go as the retribution for a successful attack would be fugly.
-
wrote on 15 Oct 2023, 17:47 last edited by
The US Navy will not get close enough for Hamas to shoot at them without revealing Iranian weapons. I seriously doubt the mullahs would risk that.
