Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Birthright Citizenship

Birthright Citizenship

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
37 Posts 9 Posters 182 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by Jolly
    #27

    I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

    I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies". As to the particulars, I think that's open to discussion.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      blondie
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      Do these rich foreign women who travel to birth in the U.S. realize the lifelong IRS tax reporting obligations of the child once the child becomes 18.5 yrs? And how their child’s income, inheritances, can be taxed? Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        OTOH, if you need a place to run to because of domestic problems, why not the U.S.?

        Secondly, a U.S. citizen can marry a foreign national in the U.S. on a fiance visa and then apply for a green card for their spouse.

        That's a couple of reasons...

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

          I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies". As to the particulars, I think that's open to discussion.

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          @Jolly said in Birthright Citizenship:

          I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

          I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies".

          What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

          Heck, why do you care whether one is a natural-born citizen or a naturalized citizen, as long as s/he fulfills the responsibilities of being a citizen?

          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • B blondie

            Do these rich foreign women who travel to birth in the U.S. realize the lifelong IRS tax reporting obligations of the child once the child becomes 18.5 yrs? And how their child’s income, inheritances, can be taxed? Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

            RenaudaR Offline
            RenaudaR Offline
            Renauda
            wrote on last edited by Renauda
            #31

            @blondie

            Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

            A former colleague - born in New Jersey to a Finnish father and Canadian mother - finally completed the process last year. Seven and half years and over $10 K USD.

            Only resided in the US for the first six months of her life. Her father was temporarily posted there for a year for business when she was born. Home was Helsinki. Moved to Canada from Finland as a full Canadian when she was 21.

            She said the process of renunciation was onerous and at time ridiculously intrusive as to personal privacy going back to her childhood.

            Last year, my son renounced his birth citizenship - Kazakhstan. A one page form, a photocopy of pages 3 and 4 of his Canadian passport and a bank draft for $50 USD payable to the Embassy in Ottawa. Six weeks later a certificate confirming loss of citizenship arrived by registered mail.

            Elbows up!

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            • AxtremusA Axtremus

              @Jolly said in Birthright Citizenship:

              I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

              I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies".

              What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

              Heck, why do you care whether one is a natural-born citizen or a naturalized citizen, as long as s/he fulfills the responsibilities of being a citizen?

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

              What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

              What's the problem with unplanned and unregulated immigration?

              That's what you are advocating.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Jolly

                @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

                What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                What's the problem with unplanned and unregulated immigration?

                That's what you are advocating.

                AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote on last edited by Axtremus
                #33

                @Jolly said in Birthright Citizenship:

                @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

                What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                What's the problem with unplanned and unregulated immigration?

                How much of the USA's immigration has been "planned" historically?

                How are "anchor babies" unregulated? They are legal, after all. And they still have to show paperwork when they apply for something/anything that resembles a right or privilege of a citizen (e.g., to get a US passport, to register to vote, etc.).

                If you think there are problems, tell me what those problems are.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34
                  1. How many other sovereign nations have anchor babies?
                  2. If you think the U.S. has always had unplanned immigration, you are historically ignorant. The U S. has had federally regulated immigration since 1876.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                    #35

                    Most of the Western Hemisphere has unrestricted birthright citizenship (or anchor babies as described above):

                    https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-birthright-citizenship

                    Nothing special about the US in this regard.

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • RenaudaR Renauda

                      @blondie

                      Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                      A former colleague - born in New Jersey to a Finnish father and Canadian mother - finally completed the process last year. Seven and half years and over $10 K USD.

                      Only resided in the US for the first six months of her life. Her father was temporarily posted there for a year for business when she was born. Home was Helsinki. Moved to Canada from Finland as a full Canadian when she was 21.

                      She said the process of renunciation was onerous and at time ridiculously intrusive as to personal privacy going back to her childhood.

                      Last year, my son renounced his birth citizenship - Kazakhstan. A one page form, a photocopy of pages 3 and 4 of his Canadian passport and a bank draft for $50 USD payable to the Embassy in Ottawa. Six weeks later a certificate confirming loss of citizenship arrived by registered mail.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      blondie
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      @Renauda said in Birthright Citizenship:

                      @blondie

                      Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                      A former colleague - born in New Jersey to a Finnish father and Canadian mother - finally completed the process last year. Seven and half years and over $10 K USD.

                      Only resided in the US for the first six months of her life. Her father was temporarily posted there for a year for business when she was born. Home was Helsinki. Moved to Canada from Finland as a full Canadian when she was 21.

                      She said the process of renunciation was onerous and at time ridiculously intrusive as to personal privacy going back to her childhood.

                      Last year, my son renounced his birth citizenship - Kazakhstan. A one page form, a photocopy of pages 3 and 4 of his Canadian passport and a bank draft for $50 USD payable to the Embassy in Ottawa. Six weeks later a certificate confirming loss of citizenship arrived by registered mail.
                      @Renauda yes.. onerous and intrusive. It took us about 3 yrs and $20K for our kid to renounce. He lived there under a year. We needed lawyers with accountants who specialize in this. He has Canadian citizenship.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote on last edited by Renauda
                        #37

                        @blondie

                        My colleague started the process when she was in her mid ‘50’s and completed it two years ago. She is now 69 years old.

                        I am surprised it cost so much for your son to renounce. Sounds like a money grab scheme.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups