Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Birthright Citizenship

Birthright Citizenship

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
37 Posts 9 Posters 182 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s a huge opportunity for mischief. But strategically now would be a good time.

    I’m not big on changing long standing constitutional principles.

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      One of the things the article mentioned was birth tourists. It has gotten news in Chinese language news - mainland Chinese mothers to be coming to the US and staying long enough to give birth. They usually go back to China, but their son/daughter is now eligible for a US passport.

      There have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

      (I do think something like the above is probably not that big a problem, but it does make good news story)

      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

        One of the things the article mentioned was birth tourists. It has gotten news in Chinese language news - mainland Chinese mothers to be coming to the US and staying long enough to give birth. They usually go back to China, but their son/daughter is now eligible for a US passport.

        There have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

        (I do think something like the above is probably not that big a problem, but it does make good news story)

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        @taiwan_girl said in Birthright Citizenship:

        here have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

        I have taken care of more than one undocumented illegal immigrant who came to the US to give birth to a US citizen.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Away
          AxtremusA Away
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          What's wrong with birthright citizenship?
          What's wrong with "anchor babies"?

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            @taiwan_girl said in Birthright Citizenship:

            here have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

            I have taken care of more than one undocumented illegal immigrant who came to the US to give birth to a US citizen.

            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #24

            @George-K said in Birthright Citizenship:

            @taiwan_girl said in Birthright Citizenship:

            here have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

            I have taken care of more than one undocumented illegal immigrant who came to the US to give birth to a US citizen.

            How did you know they were illegal? Often they’re middle class and eligible for a tourist visa and take a plane here. Crossing on foot through the desert isn’t the most appealing thing for a woman who’s 8 months pregnant.

            ‘Birth tourism’ is not cheap, after all.

            "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
            -Cormac McCarthy

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              @George-K said in Birthright Citizenship:

              @taiwan_girl said in Birthright Citizenship:

              here have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

              I have taken care of more than one undocumented illegal immigrant who came to the US to give birth to a US citizen.

              How did you know they were illegal? Often they’re middle class and eligible for a tourist visa and take a plane here. Crossing on foot through the desert isn’t the most appealing thing for a woman who’s 8 months pregnant.

              ‘Birth tourism’ is not cheap, after all.

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              @jon-nyc said in Birthright Citizenship:

              @George-K said in Birthright Citizenship:

              @taiwan_girl said in Birthright Citizenship:

              here have been some "birth hotels" in California that have been raided, etc.

              I have taken care of more than one undocumented illegal immigrant who came to the US to give birth to a US citizen.

              How did you know they were illegal? Often they’re middle class and eligible for a tourist visa and take a plane here. Crossing on foot through the desert isn’t the most appealing thing for a woman who’s 8 months pregnant.

              ‘Birth tourism’ is not cheap, after all.

              We had them all the time. At least the migrant kind. The local nursery industry used a lot of illegal immigrant labor. EMTALA decrees you can't turn a woman in labor away. You put her in the hospital and deliver the baby.

              As for the tourism bit...If I had a Chinese middle or upper class mother, seven or eight months pregnant, paying cash for her delivery...I'd take a hard look at that.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                #26

                There’s a distinction between illegal immogrants who come here for a better life and end up having a kid and those who make a trip here specifically to have their kid on US soil and then go home. The latter is a luxury good open to the higher ends of the middle classes and above. I’ve known a few myself.

                "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                -Cormac McCarthy

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by Jolly
                  #27

                  I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

                  I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies". As to the particulars, I think that's open to discussion.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    blondie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    Do these rich foreign women who travel to birth in the U.S. realize the lifelong IRS tax reporting obligations of the child once the child becomes 18.5 yrs? And how their child’s income, inheritances, can be taxed? Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      OTOH, if you need a place to run to because of domestic problems, why not the U.S.?

                      Secondly, a U.S. citizen can marry a foreign national in the U.S. on a fiance visa and then apply for a green card for their spouse.

                      That's a couple of reasons...

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Jolly

                        I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

                        I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies". As to the particulars, I think that's open to discussion.

                        AxtremusA Away
                        AxtremusA Away
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        @Jolly said in Birthright Citizenship:

                        I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

                        I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies".

                        What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                        Heck, why do you care whether one is a natural-born citizen or a naturalized citizen, as long as s/he fulfills the responsibilities of being a citizen?

                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • B blondie

                          Do these rich foreign women who travel to birth in the U.S. realize the lifelong IRS tax reporting obligations of the child once the child becomes 18.5 yrs? And how their child’s income, inheritances, can be taxed? Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote on last edited by Renauda
                          #31

                          @blondie

                          Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                          A former colleague - born in New Jersey to a Finnish father and Canadian mother - finally completed the process last year. Seven and half years and over $10 K USD.

                          Only resided in the US for the first six months of her life. Her father was temporarily posted there for a year for business when she was born. Home was Helsinki. Moved to Canada from Finland as a full Canadian when she was 21.

                          She said the process of renunciation was onerous and at time ridiculously intrusive as to personal privacy going back to her childhood.

                          Last year, my son renounced his birth citizenship - Kazakhstan. A one page form, a photocopy of pages 3 and 4 of his Canadian passport and a bank draft for $50 USD payable to the Embassy in Ottawa. Six weeks later a certificate confirming loss of citizenship arrived by registered mail.

                          Elbows up!

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          • AxtremusA Axtremus

                            @Jolly said in Birthright Citizenship:

                            I see no difference, as far as citizenship is concerned. Being a U.S. citizen should mean something. With that citizenship comes all rights, privileges and responsibilities of being a citizen.

                            I see no problem with the proposal of discontinuing the "anchor babies".

                            What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                            Heck, why do you care whether one is a natural-born citizen or a naturalized citizen, as long as s/he fulfills the responsibilities of being a citizen?

                            JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

                            What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                            What's the problem with unplanned and unregulated immigration?

                            That's what you are advocating.

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

                              What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                              What's the problem with unplanned and unregulated immigration?

                              That's what you are advocating.

                              AxtremusA Away
                              AxtremusA Away
                              Axtremus
                              wrote on last edited by Axtremus
                              #33

                              @Jolly said in Birthright Citizenship:

                              @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

                              What's the problem as long as the "anchor babies" who enjoy all the rights & privileges of citizenship also grow up to fulfill the responsibilities of being citizens?

                              What's the problem with unplanned and unregulated immigration?

                              How much of the USA's immigration has been "planned" historically?

                              How are "anchor babies" unregulated? They are legal, after all. And they still have to show paperwork when they apply for something/anything that resembles a right or privilege of a citizen (e.g., to get a US passport, to register to vote, etc.).

                              If you think there are problems, tell me what those problems are.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #34
                                1. How many other sovereign nations have anchor babies?
                                2. If you think the U.S. has always had unplanned immigration, you are historically ignorant. The U S. has had federally regulated immigration since 1876.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • RenaudaR Offline
                                  RenaudaR Offline
                                  Renauda
                                  wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                  #35

                                  Most of the Western Hemisphere has unrestricted birthright citizenship (or anchor babies as described above):

                                  https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-birthright-citizenship

                                  Nothing special about the US in this regard.

                                  Elbows up!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RenaudaR Renauda

                                    @blondie

                                    Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                                    A former colleague - born in New Jersey to a Finnish father and Canadian mother - finally completed the process last year. Seven and half years and over $10 K USD.

                                    Only resided in the US for the first six months of her life. Her father was temporarily posted there for a year for business when she was born. Home was Helsinki. Moved to Canada from Finland as a full Canadian when she was 21.

                                    She said the process of renunciation was onerous and at time ridiculously intrusive as to personal privacy going back to her childhood.

                                    Last year, my son renounced his birth citizenship - Kazakhstan. A one page form, a photocopy of pages 3 and 4 of his Canadian passport and a bank draft for $50 USD payable to the Embassy in Ottawa. Six weeks later a certificate confirming loss of citizenship arrived by registered mail.

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    blondie
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #36

                                    @Renauda said in Birthright Citizenship:

                                    @blondie

                                    Or how expensive and complicated Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship can get from abroad?

                                    A former colleague - born in New Jersey to a Finnish father and Canadian mother - finally completed the process last year. Seven and half years and over $10 K USD.

                                    Only resided in the US for the first six months of her life. Her father was temporarily posted there for a year for business when she was born. Home was Helsinki. Moved to Canada from Finland as a full Canadian when she was 21.

                                    She said the process of renunciation was onerous and at time ridiculously intrusive as to personal privacy going back to her childhood.

                                    Last year, my son renounced his birth citizenship - Kazakhstan. A one page form, a photocopy of pages 3 and 4 of his Canadian passport and a bank draft for $50 USD payable to the Embassy in Ottawa. Six weeks later a certificate confirming loss of citizenship arrived by registered mail.
                                    @Renauda yes.. onerous and intrusive. It took us about 3 yrs and $20K for our kid to renounce. He lived there under a year. We needed lawyers with accountants who specialize in this. He has Canadian citizenship.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RenaudaR Offline
                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                      #37

                                      @blondie

                                      My colleague started the process when she was in her mid ‘50’s and completed it two years ago. She is now 69 years old.

                                      I am surprised it cost so much for your son to renounce. Sounds like a money grab scheme.

                                      Elbows up!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups