Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys

Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
24 Posts 6 Posters 174 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Just to watch it die.

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

    Just to watch it he/him die.

    FIFY 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 Offline
      89th8 Offline
      89th
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      That is a tragic story. I will admit, and I know it's probably rude of me, but I'd have to imagine they could've afforded a cheap flight or drive to a state that allows abortion.

      That being said, is an early induction of labor considered abortion? I know the doctor recommended that but later decided they wouldn't perform an early induction because of the liability.

      jon-nycJ AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        The problem in Texas is the law is pretty vague in terms of what you might get sued or prosecuted for.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • 89th8 89th

          That is a tragic story. I will admit, and I know it's probably rude of me, but I'd have to imagine they could've afforded a cheap flight or drive to a state that allows abortion.

          That being said, is an early induction of labor considered abortion? I know the doctor recommended that but later decided they wouldn't perform an early induction because of the liability.

          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
          • MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Nor am I.

            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 89th

              That is a tragic story. I will admit, and I know it's probably rude of me, but I'd have to imagine they could've afforded a cheap flight or drive to a state that allows abortion.

              That being said, is an early induction of labor considered abortion? I know the doctor recommended that but later decided they wouldn't perform an early induction because of the liability.

              AxtremusA Away
              AxtremusA Away
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by Axtremus
              #7

              @89th said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

              … but I'd have to imagine they could've afforded a cheap flight or drive to a state that allows abortion.

              Specific to this case, it’s reported in the article that “The only options were to go out of state to get an abortion or to carry the baby to full term, and Dorbert and her husband didn’t have the money to travel.”

              More generally, even if they can, they should not have to.

              In practice, however, all other states near Florida also have strict anti-abortion laws. Up until mid-April, Florida was itself the “go to” state for pregnant women in the region seeking to abort.

              As for air travel, typically airlines allow pregnant women to fly up to 36 weeks, and that’s for otherwise healthy women with no other risk factor. And it may not be a “single trip” affair — for good reasons, the doctor may want to examine the patient first before even allowing the patient to schedule the procedure. Then you are looking at at least two round trips.

              Plus going out of state also means going outside their healthcare insurance’s network — that also often translates to higher costs for the patient.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                True, GA bans at 6 weeks, AL ban is outright, SC at 21 weeks. This girl probably would have had to come as far as DC or even PA.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by Jolly
                  #9

                  There are only a handful of states that permit abortion at >24 weeks. As it should be. Left up to me, it would be none of them.

                  Bad law is made on isolated cases.

                  Florida has passed the law, but not yet implemented it, to ban abortion after 6 weeks. As a practical matter, I think that most states eventually change to something in the neighborhood of of 12-20 weeks.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  jon-nycJ JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    There are only a handful of states that permit abortion at >24 weeks. As it should be. Left up to me, it would be none of them.

                    Bad law is made on isolated cases.

                    Florida has passed the law, but not yet implemented it, to ban abortion after 6 weeks. As a practical matter, I think that most states eventually change to something in the neighborhood of of 12-20 weeks.

                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @Jolly So you’re fine with this outcome?

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Yep.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Jolly

                        Yep.

                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                        Yep.

                        What’s the point in forcing a woman to carry a doomed baby to term? What is gained by it?

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Jolly

                          There are only a handful of states that permit abortion at >24 weeks. As it should be. Left up to me, it would be none of them.

                          Bad law is made on isolated cases.

                          Florida has passed the law, but not yet implemented it, to ban abortion after 6 weeks. As a practical matter, I think that most states eventually change to something in the neighborhood of of 12-20 weeks.

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by Jolly
                          #13

                          @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                          Bad law is made on isolated cases.

                          I repeat.

                          At the time, I think Florida's law was 22 weeks. That's reasonable. Her life was not in danger.

                          And...I've seen miracles with no medical explanation. I've seen ultrasounds that were faulty. I've seen bad diagnoses made.

                          Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you. Man is an imperfect being living in an imperfect world. Take every library and every last electron of the internet, combine all that knowledge and nobody will have all the answers. Not me, not you, not any mortal.

                          There is an answer. There is a reason. Just not here.

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                          • JollyJ Jolly

                            @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                            Bad law is made on isolated cases.

                            I repeat.

                            At the time, I think Florida's law was 22 weeks. That's reasonable. Her life was not in danger.

                            And...I've seen miracles with no medical explanation. I've seen ultrasounds that were faulty. I've seen bad diagnoses made.

                            Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you. Man is an imperfect being living in an imperfect world. Take every library and every last electron of the internet, combine all that knowledge and nobody will have all the answers. Not me, not you, not any mortal.

                            There is an answer. There is a reason. Just not here.

                            AxtremusA Away
                            AxtremusA Away
                            Axtremus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                            Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.

                            Just think of it as:
                            “God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
                            Use it, play the card.

                            Further extensions:
                            “God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
                            Use it, play the card.

                            What you have not been given:
                            ”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
                            I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)

                            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Axtremus

                              @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                              Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.

                              Just think of it as:
                              “God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
                              Use it, play the card.

                              Further extensions:
                              “God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
                              Use it, play the card.

                              What you have not been given:
                              ”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
                              I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)

                              JollyJ Offline
                              JollyJ Offline
                              Jolly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              @Axtremus said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                              @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                              Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.

                              Just think of it as:
                              “God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
                              Use it, play the card.

                              Further extensions:
                              “God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
                              Use it, play the card.

                              What you have not been given:
                              ”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
                              I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)

                              Lad, I don't mock God.

                              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • MikM Offline
                                MikM Offline
                                Mik
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                A safe abortion. That’s rich. I hear they do safe executions in the prison system too.

                                It’s second only to abortion described as women’s healthcare.

                                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                  @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.

                                  AxtremusA Away
                                  AxtremusA Away
                                  Axtremus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                                  @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, ...

                                  On that point, just today the NC Republican controlled legislature pushed through a 12-week abortion ban in 48 hours:

                                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/04/north-carolina-abortion-ban/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                    #18

                                    Yes, but…

                                    The North Carolina Senate voted 29-20 on Thursday, entirely along party lines, to advance legislation prohibiting most abortions after 12 weeks of gestation, with exceptions for rape and incest (up to 20 weeks of gestation), “life-limiting anomalies,” (up to 24 weeks), and life of the mother (no limit).

                                    That’s all this woman would have needed.

                                    Only non-witches get due process.

                                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Offline
                                      MikM Offline
                                      Mik
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      We’re in NC this weekend and have of course heard a lot about this on the news. It also includes up to 24 weeks for a malformed child and no limit for life of the mother situations. It’s not extreme.

                                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        If the headline 12 were 15 I’d be perfectly fine with it.

                                        Well, scratch that. I’m not sure why they limit unviable fetus to 24 weeks. Not sure I see the need for a limit at all.

                                        Only non-witches get due process.

                                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Mik

                                          We’re in NC this weekend and have of course heard a lot about this on the news. It also includes up to 24 weeks for a malformed child and no limit for life of the mother situations. It’s not extreme.

                                          George KG Offline
                                          George KG Offline
                                          George K
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @Mik said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                                          It’s not extreme.

                                          And it is the standard in repressive countries like Latvia, Greece, Germany, Switzerland.....

                                          Funny how that never gets mentioned.

                                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups