Go Magat, Go Broke
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 23:17 last edited by
Well, Fox really, really, really did not want to go to trial.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 23:18 last edited by
@Mik said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Well, Fox really, really, really did not want to go to trial.
And have Hannity, et al testify? Of course not!
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 02:40 last edited by
This settlement is second only to the Alex Jones verdict in size for libel.
The difference is, Jones will never pay the full 965MM as he doesn’t have it.
That sort of makes this #1.
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 04:35 last edited by
And two weeks from now, the public will go "What?" .
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 12:00 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 15:52 last edited by
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
-
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 16:02 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
Nah.
I'm still waiting for Rachel Maddow to apologize and for the New York Times to return the Pulitzer.
-
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 16:23 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
They already did. Note they did not amplify the desperate claims of the maga losers in November.
-
wrote on 20 Apr 2023, 20:51 last edited by
Newsmax and OANN each have Dominion suits too.
Same judge.
-
wrote on 20 Apr 2023, 21:35 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Newsmax and OANN each have Dominion suits too.
Same judge.
Those could and should bankrupt both groups and I have no problem with that.
I still haven’t seen any reporting re: Fox that shows they actually slandered Dominion. Only that they reported in the President’s claims.
-
wrote on 20 Apr 2023, 21:47 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Same judge.
One commentator (Dersh?) said that the judge saying that Fox's statements were false before the trial would be legit grounds for an appeal.
Of course, an appeal would happen after a trial, and presumed loss by Fox.
They didn't want the trial.
-
@jon-nyc said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Newsmax and OANN each have Dominion suits too.
Same judge.
Those could and should bankrupt both groups and I have no problem with that.
I still haven’t seen any reporting re: Fox that shows they actually slandered Dominion. Only that they reported in the President’s claims.
wrote on 20 Apr 2023, 21:50 last edited byWhat news channel do you watch at home?
-
wrote on 21 Apr 2023, 00:07 last edited by Doctor Phibes
I've been repeatedly told that Fox News is a quality news organization, and that I only think otherwise because I'm a snobby bastard.
Well, fuck me sideways, I was right all along.
-
I've been repeatedly told that Fox News is a quality news organization, and that I only think otherwise because I'm a snobby bastard.
Well, fuck me sideways, I was right all along.
wrote on 21 Apr 2023, 00:09 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
I'm a snobby bastard.
Well, fuck me sideways, I was right all along.QFT....
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
I'm a snobby bastard.
Well, fuck me sideways, I was right all along.QFT....
wrote on 21 Apr 2023, 00:17 last edited by Doctor Phibes@George-K said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
I'm a snobby bastard.
Well, fuck me sideways, I was right all along.QFT....
Let's hope the Daily Mail lose their current lawsuit as well. It will be a very satisfying twofer. As we all know, that publication lots much of its usefulness at the point when outdoor lavatories became obsolete..
-
wrote on 23 Apr 2023, 16:19 last edited by
Jonah Goldberg puts the settlement in perspective - asking how many MyPillow ads they'd have to sell to cover the cost.
“The Dominion settlement amounts to 78,750 30-second My Pillow ads. That’s about 27 days of watching Mike Lindell pop out from behind the medicine cabinet to talk about Giza cotton and whatnot. For perspective, the entire run of all 745 episodes of The Simpsons—viewed back-to-back with no commercial interruptions—would take slightly more than 11 days to watch."
-
Jonah Goldberg puts the settlement in perspective - asking how many MyPillow ads they'd have to sell to cover the cost.
“The Dominion settlement amounts to 78,750 30-second My Pillow ads. That’s about 27 days of watching Mike Lindell pop out from behind the medicine cabinet to talk about Giza cotton and whatnot. For perspective, the entire run of all 745 episodes of The Simpsons—viewed back-to-back with no commercial interruptions—would take slightly more than 11 days to watch."
wrote on 23 Apr 2023, 21:46 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Jonah Goldberg puts the settlement in perspective - asking how many MyPillow ads they'd have to sell to cover the cost.
“The Dominion settlement amounts to 78,750 30-second My Pillow ads. That’s about 27 days of watching Mike Lindell pop out from behind the medicine cabinet to talk about Giza cotton and whatnot.
Or almost 3 man-Scaramucci's
-
wrote on 23 Apr 2023, 22:05 last edited by
Goldberg, the Never-Trumper who used to be at National Review?
-
wrote on 23 Apr 2023, 22:14 last edited by xenon
Aren’t most mainstream pundits Never-Trumpers?
Like, isn’t Tucker just a Never Trumper that plays a Trumper on TV?
-
wrote on 23 Apr 2023, 22:36 last edited by jon-nyc
@Jolly said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Goldberg, the Never-Trumper who used to be at National Review?
Who since co-founded Dispatch Media which seems to be doing quite well.
But it’s just a jocular take on the magnitude of the settlement. It’s not serious, besides, Dominion will own MyPillow soon anyway.