Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. No representation

No representation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
18 Posts 8 Posters 194 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jon-nyc
    4 Jul 2020, 18:06

    The Congress of Confederation (pre-dating the constitution) organized the Northwest territory (OH and environs) which had been ceded to the US from Britain by the treaty of Paris.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Ordinance

    X Offline
    X Offline
    xenon
    wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 last edited by xenon 7 Apr 2020, 18:10
    #8

    @jon-nyc have been reading here a bit this morning as well.

    Seems like a key provision here is the land ordinance of 1784 (linked in the wiki above as well):

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Ordinance_of_1784

    Saying that all of these territories are temporary and would eventually be turned into a state.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 18:20 last edited by
      #9

      Yeah, that was certainly the intention for those original territories and the Louisiana Purchase, and the territory gained from Mexico.

      It was only in the Spanish American war that we gained territories that people then had no intention of turning into a state. It was very controversial, a prominent 'Anti-Imperialist League' was formed over it.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 18:21 last edited by jon-nyc 7 Apr 2020, 18:21
        #10

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Anti-Imperialist_League

        Check out the prominent member list.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          bachophile
          wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 18:37 last edited by
          #11

          Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1

          L 1 Reply Last reply 5 Jul 2020, 18:08
          • J jon-nyc
            4 Jul 2020, 17:19

            Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

            FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 18:55 last edited by
            #12

            @jon-nyc said in No representation:

            Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

            FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

            If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            G 1 Reply Last reply 4 Jul 2020, 23:06
            • J Jolly
              4 Jul 2020, 18:55

              @jon-nyc said in No representation:

              Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

              FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

              If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              George K
              wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 23:06 last edited by
              #13

              @Jolly said in No representation:

              @jon-nyc said in No representation:

              Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

              FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

              If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

              Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

              Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              C J 2 Replies Last reply 4 Jul 2020, 23:58
              • G George K
                4 Jul 2020, 23:06

                @Jolly said in No representation:

                @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Copper
                wrote on 4 Jul 2020, 23:58 last edited by
                #14

                @George-K said in No representation:

                Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                A new language?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • G George K
                  4 Jul 2020, 23:06

                  @Jolly said in No representation:

                  @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                  Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                  FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                  If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                  Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                  Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on 5 Jul 2020, 02:08 last edited by jon-nyc 7 May 2020, 02:09
                  #15

                  @George-K said in No representation:

                  Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                  Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                  IIRC it was always a three way choice, statehood, independence, or status quo. Status quo always won. They used to have a special economic deal that encouraged businesses to locate there. So there was a lot of economic interest in status quo. People liked their US passports too and always had the option to go to the mainland.

                  That’s what most pissed me off about Obama’s pardon of Oscar Lopez Rivera and how that was played in the press. They (The press) acted like he was this freedom fighter opposing American oppression when in reality he tried to achieve through violence what Puerto Rican voters roundly rejected multiple times at the ballot box.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on 5 Jul 2020, 02:52 last edited by
                    #16

                    Don't forget about Guam, the Marianna Island, American Samoa, etc.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on 5 Jul 2020, 02:55 last edited by
                      #17

                      I think that was all Spanish empire bits we picked up in 1898

                      The anti-imperialist league was right.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • B bachophile
                        4 Jul 2020, 18:37

                        Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on 5 Jul 2020, 18:08 last edited by
                        #18

                        @bachophile said in No representation:

                        Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1

                        And they get more practical representation than any city in the world.

                        The Brad

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes

                        17/18

                        5 Jul 2020, 02:55


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        17 out of 18
                        • First post
                          17/18
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups