Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. No representation

No representation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
18 Posts 8 Posters 194 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #3

    Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

    FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    X JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

      FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

      X Offline
      X Offline
      xenon
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @jon-nyc hmm.. you’re right.

      The federal government is mandated with administering the Union - Is a territory something outside of that framework?

      They’re not part of the “United States” in a literal sense. What are they?

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        They have representation. They have no vote.

        X Offline
        X Offline
        xenon
        wrote on last edited by xenon
        #5

        @Jolly said in No representation:

        They have representation. They have no vote.

        This gets theoretical. Is it really representation if the people have no vote or recourse? (And who represents them?)

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          We had territories before we had the constitution and during its ratification (and ever since). So they aren't outside of the constitutional purview.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            The Congress of Confederation (pre-dating the constitution) organized the Northwest territory (OH and environs) which had been ceded to the US from Britain by the treaty of Paris.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Ordinance

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            X 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              The Congress of Confederation (pre-dating the constitution) organized the Northwest territory (OH and environs) which had been ceded to the US from Britain by the treaty of Paris.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Ordinance

              X Offline
              X Offline
              xenon
              wrote on last edited by xenon
              #8

              @jon-nyc have been reading here a bit this morning as well.

              Seems like a key provision here is the land ordinance of 1784 (linked in the wiki above as well):

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Ordinance_of_1784

              Saying that all of these territories are temporary and would eventually be turned into a state.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Yeah, that was certainly the intention for those original territories and the Louisiana Purchase, and the territory gained from Mexico.

                It was only in the Spanish American war that we gained territories that people then had no intention of turning into a state. It was very controversial, a prominent 'Anti-Imperialist League' was formed over it.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                  #10

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Anti-Imperialist_League

                  Check out the prominent member list.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • bachophileB Offline
                    bachophileB Offline
                    bachophile
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1

                    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                      FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                      JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                      Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                      FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                      If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Jolly

                        @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                        Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                        FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                        If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                        George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @Jolly said in No representation:

                        @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                        Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                        FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                        If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                        Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                        Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        CopperC jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        • George KG George K

                          @Jolly said in No representation:

                          @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                          Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                          FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                          If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                          Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                          Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                          CopperC Offline
                          CopperC Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @George-K said in No representation:

                          Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                          A new language?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG George K

                            @Jolly said in No representation:

                            @jon-nyc said in No representation:

                            Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.

                            FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.

                            If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.

                            Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                            Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                            #15

                            @George-K said in No representation:

                            Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?

                            Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?

                            IIRC it was always a three way choice, statehood, independence, or status quo. Status quo always won. They used to have a special economic deal that encouraged businesses to locate there. So there was a lot of economic interest in status quo. People liked their US passports too and always had the option to go to the mainland.

                            That’s what most pissed me off about Obama’s pardon of Oscar Lopez Rivera and how that was played in the press. They (The press) acted like he was this freedom fighter opposing American oppression when in reality he tried to achieve through violence what Puerto Rican voters roundly rejected multiple times at the ballot box.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LarryL Offline
                              LarryL Offline
                              Larry
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Don't forget about Guam, the Marianna Island, American Samoa, etc.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                I think that was all Spanish empire bits we picked up in 1898

                                The anti-imperialist league was right.

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • bachophileB bachophile

                                  Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1

                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @bachophile said in No representation:

                                  Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1

                                  And they get more practical representation than any city in the world.

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups