No representation
-
Yeah, that was certainly the intention for those original territories and the Louisiana Purchase, and the territory gained from Mexico.
It was only in the Spanish American war that we gained territories that people then had no intention of turning into a state. It was very controversial, a prominent 'Anti-Imperialist League' was formed over it.
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Anti-Imperialist_League
Check out the prominent member list.
-
Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1
-
Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.
FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.
@jon-nyc said in No representation:
Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.
FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.
If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.
-
@jon-nyc said in No representation:
Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.
FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.
If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.
@Jolly said in No representation:
@jon-nyc said in No representation:
Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.
FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.
If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.
Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?
Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@Jolly said in No representation:
@jon-nyc said in No representation:
Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.
FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.
If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.
Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?
Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?
-
@Jolly said in No representation:
@jon-nyc said in No representation:
Wrong null hypothesis. The union was a compact among states.
FWIW Puerto Rico has voted against statehood a number of times.
If they had voted for statehood, I think it very probable they would have been the 51st.
Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?
Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?
@George-K said in No representation:
Too lazy to look it up - why did they not vote for statehood?
Presumably the benefits of statehood aren't worth it. Wonder what those are?
IIRC it was always a three way choice, statehood, independence, or status quo. Status quo always won. They used to have a special economic deal that encouraged businesses to locate there. So there was a lot of economic interest in status quo. People liked their US passports too and always had the option to go to the mainland.
That’s what most pissed me off about Obama’s pardon of Oscar Lopez Rivera and how that was played in the press. They (The press) acted like he was this freedom fighter opposing American oppression when in reality he tried to achieve through violence what Puerto Rican voters roundly rejected multiple times at the ballot box.
-
Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1
@bachophile said in No representation:
Did u know that the District of Columbia is a member of the unrpresented nations and peoples organization?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrepresented_Nations_and_Peoples_Organization?wprov=sfsi1
And they get more practical representation than any city in the world.
