Facebook community standards
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 10:52 last edited by Improviso
Not that I give a shit, but just wanted to see what Facebooks response would be to hate speech against conservatives.
Just what I thought it would be.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:05 last edited by
"No one should have to see posts they consider hateful on Facebook . . . "
Why not? Facebook only allows puppy dogs and rainbows? Facebook doesn't like unpleasantness?
Ain't that a shame.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:25 last edited by Jolly
No, if you voice similar conservative opinions, or something they consider too Christian, your post will be deleted.
Puppy dogs and rainbows only apply for certain viewpoints.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:31 last edited by
I'm just curious what a heatbear is. Sounds cool.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:33 last edited by
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:36 last edited by
I can advocate for the murder of white peoples all day and nobody minds. But if you start encouraging rape, people get uptight.
-
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:37 last edited by@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
-
I can advocate for the murder of white peoples all day and nobody minds. But if you start encouraging rape, people get uptight.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:39 last edited by@Horace said in Facebook community standards:
I can advocate for the murder of white peoples all day and nobody minds.
On Facebook? Please link to your Facebook posts where you do that. It would be interesting to see.
-
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:54 last edited by Improviso@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
The fact that you don't see a problem with it says much about you.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:56 last edited by
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
-
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:57 last edited by@89th said in Facebook community standards:
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
-
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 11:58 last edited by@89th said in Facebook community standards:
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:01 last edited by
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
-
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:02 last edited by@Horace said in Facebook community standards:
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
Has the black SUV with tinted glass shown up in front of your house yet?
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:04 last edited by
Oh crap... gotta go. There's one in front of mine now.
-
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
The fact that you don't see a problem with it says much about you.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:30 last edited by@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
-
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:36 last edited by@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
https://www.facebook.com/joan.kellyquinn/posts/10208306068483957
https://www.facebook.com/joey.spriggs.7/posts/2151355344874680
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:41 last edited by Improviso
And as you can see, Facebook's response to the second one was yesterday. 6/24/2020.
So much for their new standards.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:43 last edited by Axtremus
Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.
-
Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:52 last edited by@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?