Facebook community standards
-
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
We have the freedom to choose our actions, but we do not get to choose our consequences.
Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you're on. -
I can advocate for the murder of white peoples all day and nobody minds. But if you start encouraging rape, people get uptight.
-
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
The fact that you don't see a problem with it says much about you.
We have the freedom to choose our actions, but we do not get to choose our consequences.
Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you're on. -
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
-
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
-
Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.
-
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
-
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
@Horace said in Facebook community standards:
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
Has the black SUV with tinted glass shown up in front of your house yet?
-
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
The fact that you don't see a problem with it says much about you.
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
-
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
https://www.facebook.com/joan.kellyquinn/posts/10208306068483957
https://www.facebook.com/joey.spriggs.7/posts/2151355344874680
-
Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.
-
Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?
-
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?
@Catseye3 said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?
Yes, thanks for catching it, I corrected it in the original post.
-
Facebook is a dumb-ass place to discuss anything serious at the best of times.
Don't be a dumb-ass, come to TNCR! Not that we object to dumb-asses. All are welcome.
-
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
What disappoints me the most is I see people I grew up with posting obviously fake crap. They just believe anything that reinforces what they already believe. There is plenty to legitimately disagree with or dislike about most any topic you can name. You don't need to perpetuate bullshit.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
What disappoints me the most is I see people I grew up with posting obviously fake crap. They just believe anything that reinforces what they already believe. There is plenty to legitimately disagree with or dislike about most any topic you can name. You don't need to perpetuate bullshit.
