Facebook community standards
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:01 last edited by
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
-
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:02 last edited by@Horace said in Facebook community standards:
FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.
Has the black SUV with tinted glass shown up in front of your house yet?
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:04 last edited by
Oh crap... gotta go. There's one in front of mine now.
-
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?
As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
The fact that you don't see a problem with it says much about you.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:30 last edited by@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
-
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:36 last edited by@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:
So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?
I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.
If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.
https://www.facebook.com/joan.kellyquinn/posts/10208306068483957
https://www.facebook.com/joey.spriggs.7/posts/2151355344874680
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:41 last edited by Improviso
And as you can see, Facebook's response to the second one was yesterday. 6/24/2020.
So much for their new standards.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:43 last edited by Axtremus
Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.
-
Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 12:52 last edited by@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?
-
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 14:02 last edited by@Catseye3 said in Facebook community standards:
@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:
The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.
Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?
Yes, thanks for catching it, I corrected it in the original post.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 14:11 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Facebook is a dumb-ass place to discuss anything serious at the best of times.
Don't be a dumb-ass, come to TNCR! Not that we object to dumb-asses. All are welcome.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 14:20 last edited by
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
What disappoints me the most is I see people I grew up with posting obviously fake crap. They just believe anything that reinforces what they already believe. There is plenty to legitimately disagree with or dislike about most any topic you can name. You don't need to perpetuate bullshit.
-
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
What disappoints me the most is I see people I grew up with posting obviously fake crap. They just believe anything that reinforces what they already believe. There is plenty to legitimately disagree with or dislike about most any topic you can name. You don't need to perpetuate bullshit.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 14:49 last edited by 89th@Mik said in Facebook community standards:
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
Let’s be honest...they use “to” instead of “too” there.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 15:02 last edited by
The great thing about TNCR is nobody reads anything we say, so we can be really obnoxious about everybody, secure in the knowledge that nobody cares.
-
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
What disappoints me the most is I see people I grew up with posting obviously fake crap. They just believe anything that reinforces what they already believe. There is plenty to legitimately disagree with or dislike about most any topic you can name. You don't need to perpetuate bullshit.
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 16:21 last edited by Copper@Mik said in Facebook community standards:
The level of discourse here is generally far above the normal 'Is too! Is not!' on FB. Ugly.
Of course I have several Facebook "friends" who have serious cases of TDS.
I also have family and friends, so I stay away from politics.
But if one of the TDS guys really bug me I just post this link
https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/
That's it, just the link, no insanity
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 16:22 last edited by
That's a beautiful thing. I try to stay away from that sort of discussion there, unless my relative posts something unbelievably stupid.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2020, 17:04 last edited by
