Facebook community standards

[Catseye3]

"No one should have to see posts they consider hateful on Facebook . . . "

Why not? Facebook only allows puppy dogs and rainbows? Facebook doesn't like unpleasantness?

Ain't that a shame.

[Jolly]

No, if you voice similar conservative opinions, or something they consider too Christian, your post will be deleted.

Puppy dogs and rainbows only apply for certain viewpoints.

[89th]

I'm just curious what a heatbear is. Sounds cool.

[Axtremus]

If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?

[Horace]

I can advocate for the murder of white peoples all day and nobody minds. But if you start encouraging rape, people get uptight.

[Improviso]

@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:

If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?

As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.

[Axtremus]

@Horace said in Facebook community standards:

I can advocate for the murder of white peoples all day and nobody minds.

On Facebook? Please link to your Facebook posts where you do that. It would be interesting to see.

[Improviso]

@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:

@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:

If you have to go back to 2017 and 2018 to find two examples by biased applications of “community standards” you disagree with, how big of a problem is it, really?

As usual, you missed the point and don't have a clue.

So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?

I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.

The fact that you don't see a problem with it says much about you.

[89th]

Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.

[George K]

@89th said in Facebook community standards:

Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.

[Improviso]

@89th said in Facebook community standards:

Welp, based on the phrases used in this thread, I just wanted to take a second to say "HI!" to the FBI person now reading this.

[Horace]

FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.

[Improviso]

@Horace said in Facebook community standards:

FBI, I am very disappointed in you for your obvious TDS. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and realize you lack the integrity and strength of character that is such a necessary ingredient in American justice.

Has the black SUV with tinted glass shown up in front of your house yet?

[Improviso]

Oh crap... gotta go. There's one in front of mine now.

[Axtremus]

@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:

So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?

I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.

If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.

[Improviso]

@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:

@Improviso said in Facebook community standards:

So Ax.... if in 2016, someone said on Facebook that Obama should be killed, you'd be OK with that?

I certainly would not. Threatening to kill a President is NOT cool. My guess is Facebook would have long ago removed a post like that. And that person would have probably been visited by the FBI.

If you believe Facebook still has not deleted a post of this nature, please link to it.

https://www.facebook.com/joan.kellyquinn/posts/10208306068483957

https://www.facebook.com/joey.spriggs.7/posts/2151355344874680

[Improviso]

And as you can see, Facebook's response to the second one was yesterday. 6/24/2020.

So much for their new standards.

[Axtremus]

Ok, @Improviso, I agree that the Joan.kellyquinn post is bad. And I disagree with Facebook’s handling of it. To that end, I will further reduce the already very limited interaction I have with Facebook.

The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have no problem with Facebook leaving it on.

[Catseye3]

@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:

The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.

Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?

[Axtremus]

@Catseye3 said in Facebook community standards:

@Axtremus said in Facebook community standards:

The Joey.spriggs.7 post is an opinion that makes no violent threat. I have problem with Facebook leaving it on.

Ax, you mean "I have no problem with FB leaving it on"?

Yes, thanks for catching it, I corrected it in the original post.