Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. What does a red wave look like?

What does a red wave look like?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
12 Posts 7 Posters 86 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

    If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you? What do you think a decisive victory for either party looks like?

    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #3

    @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

    If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you?

    Certainly not. I don’t know how constructive it is to argue about slippery definitions but i would think “Red Wave” would require something materially greater than the average historical loss the incumbent president’s party sees in a midterm election.

    (That average is 28 house seats and 4 senate seats.)

    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
    -Cormac McCarthy

    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

      If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you?

      Certainly not. I don’t know how constructive it is to argue about slippery definitions but i would think “Red Wave” would require something materially greater than the average historical loss the incumbent president’s party sees in a midterm election.

      (That average is 28 house seats and 4 senate seats.)

      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @jon-nyc said in What does a red wave look like?:

      @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

      If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you?

      Certainly not. I don’t know how constructive it is to argue about slippery definitions but i would think “Red Wave” would require something materially greater than the average historical loss the incumbent president’s party sees in a midterm election.

      (That average is 28 house seats and 4 senate seats.)

      That was kind of my thinking as well. I feel like we need to see at least 35 House Seats, and if the GOP only picks up 3 Senate Seats, I don’t know that is a “wave”. I suppose if you see some gains in Governors and State Houses…

      Spanberger vs Vega in VA is going to tell you how bad of a night it will be for Democrats. I’m also watching the NH Senate Race…

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
          #6

          @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

          It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

          Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

          "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
          -Cormac McCarthy

          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Dream on. That will likely never happen again.

            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

              It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

              Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @jon-nyc said in What does a red wave look like?:

              @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

              It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

              Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

              When was the last time a party controlled that much of Congress? I mean, we’ve had vetoes overridden as recently as 2021, but when was the last time it was possible without bipartisan support?

              The Brad

              CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                @jon-nyc said in What does a red wave look like?:

                @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

                It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

                Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

                When was the last time a party controlled that much of Congress? I mean, we’ve had vetoes overridden as recently as 2021, but when was the last time it was possible without bipartisan support?

                CopperC Offline
                CopperC Offline
                Copper
                wrote on last edited by Copper
                #9

                @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

                When was the last time a party controlled that much of Congress?

                1977 Congress 292 D (67%), 143 R Senate D (61%)D

                1965 Congress 295 D (68%), 140 R Senate D (68%)D

                https://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/

                https://www.senate.gov/history/partydiv.htm

                Accomplishments, Great Society and Viet Nam

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                  #10

                  I was going to say after Watergate or if not definitely the Johnson landslide over Goldwater. Before that probably the 30s.

                  "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                  -Cormac McCarthy

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Historically, has MSM and social media ever been this far in the tank for either party?

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Offline
                      HoraceH Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      I suspect a meaningful parallel could be drawn between the red scare after ww2, and our current 'right wing existential threat' meme.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups