Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. What does a red wave look like?

What does a red wave look like?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
12 Posts 7 Posters 86 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I don't know if Rogan's right, but this is funny:

    Link to video

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

      If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you? What do you think a decisive victory for either party looks like?

      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #3

      @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

      If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you?

      Certainly not. I don’t know how constructive it is to argue about slippery definitions but i would think “Red Wave” would require something materially greater than the average historical loss the incumbent president’s party sees in a midterm election.

      (That average is 28 house seats and 4 senate seats.)

      If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

        If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you?

        Certainly not. I don’t know how constructive it is to argue about slippery definitions but i would think “Red Wave” would require something materially greater than the average historical loss the incumbent president’s party sees in a midterm election.

        (That average is 28 house seats and 4 senate seats.)

        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        @jon-nyc said in What does a red wave look like?:

        @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

        If Republicans pickup 2 seats in the Senate and 30 in the House, does that constitute a “Red Wave” to you?

        Certainly not. I don’t know how constructive it is to argue about slippery definitions but i would think “Red Wave” would require something materially greater than the average historical loss the incumbent president’s party sees in a midterm election.

        (That average is 28 house seats and 4 senate seats.)

        That was kind of my thinking as well. I feel like we need to see at least 35 House Seats, and if the GOP only picks up 3 Senate Seats, I don’t know that is a “wave”. I suppose if you see some gains in Governors and State Houses…

        Spanberger vs Vega in VA is going to tell you how bad of a night it will be for Democrats. I’m also watching the NH Senate Race…

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Mik

            It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #6

            @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

            It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

            Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

            If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Dream on. That will likely never happen again.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

                It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

                Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @jon-nyc said in What does a red wave look like?:

                @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

                It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

                Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

                When was the last time a party controlled that much of Congress? I mean, we’ve had vetoes overridden as recently as 2021, but when was the last time it was possible without bipartisan support?

                The Brad

                CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  @jon-nyc said in What does a red wave look like?:

                  @Mik said in What does a red wave look like?:

                  It won't be enough to give us a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. That's all that really matters at this point.

                  Really what you would want is enough for a veto override, which is an even higher bar - 2/3 of each body.

                  When was the last time a party controlled that much of Congress? I mean, we’ve had vetoes overridden as recently as 2021, but when was the last time it was possible without bipartisan support?

                  CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by Copper
                  #9

                  @LuFins-Dad said in What does a red wave look like?:

                  When was the last time a party controlled that much of Congress?

                  1977 Congress 292 D (67%), 143 R Senate D (61%)D

                  1965 Congress 295 D (68%), 140 R Senate D (68%)D

                  https://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/

                  https://www.senate.gov/history/partydiv.htm

                  Accomplishments, Great Society and Viet Nam

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                    #10

                    I was going to say after Watergate or if not definitely the Johnson landslide over Goldwater. Before that probably the 30s.

                    If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Historically, has MSM and social media ever been this far in the tank for either party?

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        I suspect a meaningful parallel could be drawn between the red scare after ww2, and our current 'right wing existential threat' meme.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups