Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trespassers can't hold office

Trespassers can't hold office

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 8 Posters 229 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    It seems this is a civil matter so due process is being followed, no?

    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      It seems this is a civil matter so due process is being followed, no?

      George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @89th said in Trespassers can't hold office:

      It seems this is a civil matter so due process is being followed, no?

      If this is a civil and not a criminal matter, why is it being adjudicated in the context of federal elections.

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
        #23

        This is as ridiculous a notion as saying the VP can choose to reject electors from certain states.

        It’s quite a Trumpian move. Like a many such moves, it would be disastrous if were allowed to proceed.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • 89th8 89th referenced this topic on
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups