Dewey's post
-
@89th said in Dewey's post:
Btw what’s the deal with the forum being in a best seller?
I think that's probably the book 'Grand Obsession' - check it out on Amazon (I haven't read it)
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 03:05 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes call me when the movie comes out lol
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 03:21 last edited by
Just read Dewey’s post. I can appreciate his sincerity just as well. I enjoyed meeting Dewey many years ago during a TNCR meet-up and the many years of thoughtful posts I’ve read. Folks handle other folks in their own way. It’s part of the what makes TNCR (and related forums) dynamic yet meaningful.
I’d reply to his post except all of his posts are on the “public” privacy setting instead of “friends” which means correspondence is well, too public, for me.
I am sad I missed what Copper wrote but am glad Phibes said something about the timing. I fully appreciate and don’t discount that others were hurt by Larry, but quite simply I’m not sure I see the utility of publicly criticizing someone after death, let alone so close to their passing. What’s the point? A warning to others not to say mean words on the internet? (Or perhaps a reminder of the value of ignoring those who bother you)
There hasn’t even been a funeral yet, that is tomorrow. Perhaps the utility is catharsis? If so, so be it. I hope the post brought Dewey and others nodding with him some closure. Let’s focus on the good in people, it will help us all rise the tide for the better.
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 13:02 last edited by
What an absolutely disgusting chicken-shit thing to publicly do to Larry.
But if those are the rules, I'll be sure to piss on Dewey's grave when his time comes and I won't hide behind the Bible when I do it.
It just reaffirms my impression of him as a long winded narcissistic poseur.
While Mrs. Dewey was devastated, he did her a huge favor years ago. She has my sympathy for all the years that she lost due to him.
Man... this really pisses me off.
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 13:42 last edited by Jolly 8 Mar 2022, 13:44
Notice that it was done in a medium where he controls any feedback and has deleted thoughts he does not agree with. I think that also says something.
-
Notice that it was done in a medium where he controls any feedback and has deleted thoughts he does not agree with. I think that also says something.
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 13:48 last edited by@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
Notice that it was done in a medium where he controls any feedback and has deleted thoughts he does not agree with. I think that also says something.
Yes he has a talent for living in a reality of his own choosing, and ignoring the rest. He surrounds himself with people who buy into his narcissistic posing (appropriate words, Improv) and it all becomes real to him.
-
@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
Notice that it was done in a medium where he controls any feedback and has deleted thoughts he does not agree with. I think that also says something.
Yes he has a talent for living in a reality of his own choosing, and ignoring the rest. He surrounds himself with people who buy into his narcissistic posing (appropriate words, Improv) and it all becomes real to him.
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 14:08 last edited by@Horace said in Dewey's post:
living in a reality of his own choosing,
We all do that. We seek to be where we are comfortable. For that reason (and others, to be sure) I don't go next door. It's normal behavior to find where you're comfortable.
-
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
living in a reality of his own choosing,
We all do that. We seek to be where we are comfortable. For that reason (and others, to be sure) I don't go next door. It's normal behavior to find where you're comfortable.
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 14:13 last edited by@George-K said in Dewey's post:
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
living in a reality of his own choosing,
We all do that. We seek to be where we are comfortable. For that reason (and others, to be sure) I don't go next door. It's normal behavior to find where you're comfortable.
Of course it is. But not all of us believe our own narratives to the same extent. Some of us are more capable of self reflection and fault acknowledgment than others.
-
Just read Dewey’s post. I can appreciate his sincerity just as well. I enjoyed meeting Dewey many years ago during a TNCR meet-up and the many years of thoughtful posts I’ve read. Folks handle other folks in their own way. It’s part of the what makes TNCR (and related forums) dynamic yet meaningful.
I’d reply to his post except all of his posts are on the “public” privacy setting instead of “friends” which means correspondence is well, too public, for me.
I am sad I missed what Copper wrote but am glad Phibes said something about the timing. I fully appreciate and don’t discount that others were hurt by Larry, but quite simply I’m not sure I see the utility of publicly criticizing someone after death, let alone so close to their passing. What’s the point? A warning to others not to say mean words on the internet? (Or perhaps a reminder of the value of ignoring those who bother you)
There hasn’t even been a funeral yet, that is tomorrow. Perhaps the utility is catharsis? If so, so be it. I hope the post brought Dewey and others nodding with him some closure. Let’s focus on the good in people, it will help us all rise the tide for the better.
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 15:46 last edited by@89th said in Dewey's post:
I am sad I missed what Copper wrote
I didn't save it, but it was only 3 lines, something like this:
What a rotten post.
Most people got along ok with Larry.
Those that did not were active participants in the brawl.
That's about it.
-
@89th said in Dewey's post:
I am sad I missed what Copper wrote
I didn't save it, but it was only 3 lines, something like this:
What a rotten post.
Most people got along ok with Larry.
Those that did not were active participants in the brawl.
That's about it.
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 15:50 last edited by Horace 8 Mar 2022, 15:55
Imagine if Dewey had gone public at the time with his fantasies of calling in a swat team to get back at Larry. We would have understood the context and laughed at it. It would have been shameful and pathetic to threaten legal action, which is why at the time, Dewey kept it to fantasy. Then in this grave-crapping post, he drags it out as a piece of rhetorical flair to impress on the gullible masses how severe the situation really was.
A primary theme of the left is, as always, to make everybody else responsible for their own emotional over-reactions. The hatred from those mediocrities on Facebook and over the fence should be reserved for maybe parents who abused you. Not internet warriors you chose to do battle with.
-
Imagine if Dewey had gone public at the time with his fantasies of calling in a swat team to get back at Larry. We would have understood the context and laughed at it. It would have been shameful and pathetic to threaten legal action, which is why at the time, Dewey kept it to fantasy. Then in this grave-crapping post, he drags it out as a piece of rhetorical flair to impress on the gullible masses how severe the situation really was.
A primary theme of the left is, as always, to make everybody else responsible for their own emotional over-reactions. The hatred from those mediocrities on Facebook and over the fence should be reserved for maybe parents who abused you. Not internet warriors you chose to do battle with.
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 19:16 last edited by@Horace said in Dewey's post:
Then in this grave-crapping post, he drags it out as a piece of rhetorical flair to impress on the gullible masses how severe the situation really was.
Love the sinner. Hate the sin.
I suppose that would be too much to ask a "man of the cloth", huh?
-
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
Then in this grave-crapping post, he drags it out as a piece of rhetorical flair to impress on the gullible masses how severe the situation really was.
Love the sinner. Hate the sin.
I suppose that would be too much to ask a "man of the cloth", huh?
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 21:40 last edited by@Improviso said in Dewey's post:
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
Then in this grave-crapping post, he drags it out as a piece of rhetorical flair to impress on the gullible masses how severe the situation really was.
Love the sinner. Hate the sin.
I suppose that would be too much to ask a "man of the cloth", huh?
I'm very sure people in his position should not make claims about the religious beliefs of others, immediately after they die or otherwise.
When people fail tests of character, they often do so publicly and proudly. It's a variation on the theme that character is shown by your actions when you think nobody is watching. People feel nobody is watching, as long as they're a good soldier in a war of good vs evil.
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 21:55 last edited by
Luke 6:43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 44 For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes. 45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 22:00 last edited by
The Matthew 7 version...
15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
-
The Matthew 7 version...
15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 23:42 last edited byI don’t agree with all the shit being thrown at Dewey. I didn’t agree with him posting what he did when he did, but he had his reasons.
This situation isn’t as simple as him being the bad guy.
-
Luke 6:43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 44 For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes. 45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.
wrote on 4 Aug 2022, 00:49 last edited by Renauda 8 Apr 2022, 01:11Don’t you start a god damned Back to the Bible Hour over this.
I doubt if anyone actually cares how adept you are at regurgitating chapter and verse.
Unless of course you want to come across as annoying about it as the narcissistic pastor whose inappropriate bullshit gave rise to this thread.
-
wrote on 4 Aug 2022, 01:01 last edited by Jolly 8 Apr 2022, 01:05
Read 'em and weep, my friend. A little Bible should neither scare nor hurt you.
If you're talking religion, use not opinion, but source material.
-
Read 'em and weep, my friend. A little Bible should neither scare nor hurt you.
If you're talking religion, use not opinion, but source material.
wrote on 4 Aug 2022, 01:14 last edited by Renauda 8 Apr 2022, 01:15@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
A little Bible should neither scare nor hurt you.
You can be assured a little or a lot does me neither.
-
wrote on 4 Aug 2022, 01:24 last edited by
This should scare you. DON'T FUCKING CALL ME BALDY!
2 Kings 2:23-24
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. ‘Get out of here, baldy!’ they said. ‘Get out of here, baldy!’ He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the LORD. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.”
-
This should scare you. DON'T FUCKING CALL ME BALDY!
2 Kings 2:23-24
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. ‘Get out of here, baldy!’ they said. ‘Get out of here, baldy!’ He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the LORD. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.”
wrote on 4 Aug 2022, 01:30 last edited bySod off,
BaldyBaldrick!