Dewey's post
-
@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
Me, I'm just me. I write like I talk, except it's hard to convey the redneck accent in text.
Wow did you hear how many syllables he had when he said “redneck”? I counted 4.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 14:52 last edited by@89th said in Dewey's post:
@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
Me, I'm just me. I write like I talk, except it's hard to convey the redneck accent in text.
Wow did you hear how many syllables he had when he said “redneck”? I counted 4.
You missed one.
-
@Tom-K said in Dewey's post:
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
He wasn't really a religious person at all; the whole subject only mattered to him insofar as it bolstered his extreme right-wing politics.
One of the little peccadillos of (some/many) Protestants is to step into the shoes of God Almighty and declare judgement on some other Protestants that aren’t in full theological agreement as “unsaved” and “unbelieving.” This may be the case with Dewey here. I didn’t follow the Larry-Dewey wars all that closely but I’m sure Larry had a similar pronouncement. (As a Catholic I don’t get into these internecine arguments and actually the one thing that just about all these Protestants agree on is that Catholics are “unsaved” and “unbelieving.”) Anyway, I do take issue here with Dewey’s appraisal. I remember when Wacky Iraqi was on the board and had terminal cancer Larry stopped his usual harangue, changed his whole demeanor, and tried to convert Wacky to the Gospel and save his soul before he died. It is exactly what Christians are supposed to do. Larry really impressed me by how he took his faith and Wacky’s salvation so seriously. It didn’t even occur to me to do something similar. And not that I would have even if it did. But Larry did it and that would be a Christian.
Well, there’s that. As to the tone of Dewey’s missive—Dewey was butt hurt by Larry and he’s just expressing what he feels. Larry, I’m sure would do something similar is the shoe was on the other foot. Next door the people there are pretty much dancing on Larry’s grave. They were sometimes on the wrong end of Larry’s personal invectives and are venting. The gleefulness is a bit troubling, but that is the sandbox we all play in. But those over there tend to see the mote in Larry’s eye and not see the plank in their own—right from the beginning they expected to lecture the poor conservatives on the error of our ways with equal measures of condescension and pity and they expected us acquiesce to their wisdom, but instead to their surprise they got one hell of a fight. All good.
One think that troubles me though: Steve Miller said over there:
"The most memorable thing about that visit was learning that Larry in person was exactly the same as Larry on line."
I really wonder if that is true.Missing your target a bit.
Most protestants don't think Catholics are unsaved or unbelieving. We do reject sacerdotalism and don't understand how y'all got so hung up on that Mary thing. And we'll just mark that building the Church on Peter idea, down to a reading comprehension problem.
As for protestant vs. protestant, most don't sweat the small stuff. I don't care if Pentecostals believe they need to speak in tongues, or Baptists abhor taking an alcoholic drink, etc. Where I do have a problem with any Christian or somebody who identifies as Christian, is when they portray something irrefutably sinful as being okey-dokey. It just doesn't work that way.
And be we whatever shade of Christianity, those pastoral letters still apply to the leadership of the church. The clergy is held to a higher standard. They don't always meet it, but they must strive to do so.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 21:31 last edited by@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
@Tom-K said in Dewey's post:
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
He wasn't really a religious person at all; the whole subject only mattered to him insofar as it bolstered his extreme right-wing politics.
One of the little peccadillos of (some/many) Protestants is to step into the shoes of God Almighty and declare judgement on some other Protestants that aren’t in full theological agreement as “unsaved” and “unbelieving.” This may be the case with Dewey here. I didn’t follow the Larry-Dewey wars all that closely but I’m sure Larry had a similar pronouncement. (As a Catholic I don’t get into these internecine arguments and actually the one thing that just about all these Protestants agree on is that Catholics are “unsaved” and “unbelieving.”) Anyway, I do take issue here with Dewey’s appraisal. I remember when Wacky Iraqi was on the board and had terminal cancer Larry stopped his usual harangue, changed his whole demeanor, and tried to convert Wacky to the Gospel and save his soul before he died. It is exactly what Christians are supposed to do. Larry really impressed me by how he took his faith and Wacky’s salvation so seriously. It didn’t even occur to me to do something similar. And not that I would have even if it did. But Larry did it and that would be a Christian.
Well, there’s that. As to the tone of Dewey’s missive—Dewey was butt hurt by Larry and he’s just expressing what he feels. Larry, I’m sure would do something similar is the shoe was on the other foot. Next door the people there are pretty much dancing on Larry’s grave. They were sometimes on the wrong end of Larry’s personal invectives and are venting. The gleefulness is a bit troubling, but that is the sandbox we all play in. But those over there tend to see the mote in Larry’s eye and not see the plank in their own—right from the beginning they expected to lecture the poor conservatives on the error of our ways with equal measures of condescension and pity and they expected us acquiesce to their wisdom, but instead to their surprise they got one hell of a fight. All good.
One think that troubles me though: Steve Miller said over there:
"The most memorable thing about that visit was learning that Larry in person was exactly the same as Larry on line."
I really wonder if that is true.Missing your target a bit.
Most protestants don't think Catholics are unsaved or unbelieving. We do reject sacerdotalism and don't understand how y'all got so hung up on that Mary thing. And we'll just mark that building the Church on Peter idea, down to a reading comprehension problem.
As for protestant vs. protestant, most don't sweat the small stuff. I don't care if Pentecostals believe they need to speak in tongues, or Baptists abhor taking an alcoholic drink, etc. Where I do have a problem with any Christian or somebody who identifies as Christian, is when they portray something irrefutably sinful as being okey-dokey. It just doesn't work that way.
And be we whatever shade of Christianity, those pastoral letters still apply to the leadership of the church. The clergy is held to a higher standard. They don't always meet it, but they must strive to do so.
I can't agree with you more, other than the part about who has the reading comprehension problem.
-
@Jolly said in Dewey's post:
@Tom-K said in Dewey's post:
@Horace said in Dewey's post:
He wasn't really a religious person at all; the whole subject only mattered to him insofar as it bolstered his extreme right-wing politics.
One of the little peccadillos of (some/many) Protestants is to step into the shoes of God Almighty and declare judgement on some other Protestants that aren’t in full theological agreement as “unsaved” and “unbelieving.” This may be the case with Dewey here. I didn’t follow the Larry-Dewey wars all that closely but I’m sure Larry had a similar pronouncement. (As a Catholic I don’t get into these internecine arguments and actually the one thing that just about all these Protestants agree on is that Catholics are “unsaved” and “unbelieving.”) Anyway, I do take issue here with Dewey’s appraisal. I remember when Wacky Iraqi was on the board and had terminal cancer Larry stopped his usual harangue, changed his whole demeanor, and tried to convert Wacky to the Gospel and save his soul before he died. It is exactly what Christians are supposed to do. Larry really impressed me by how he took his faith and Wacky’s salvation so seriously. It didn’t even occur to me to do something similar. And not that I would have even if it did. But Larry did it and that would be a Christian.
Well, there’s that. As to the tone of Dewey’s missive—Dewey was butt hurt by Larry and he’s just expressing what he feels. Larry, I’m sure would do something similar is the shoe was on the other foot. Next door the people there are pretty much dancing on Larry’s grave. They were sometimes on the wrong end of Larry’s personal invectives and are venting. The gleefulness is a bit troubling, but that is the sandbox we all play in. But those over there tend to see the mote in Larry’s eye and not see the plank in their own—right from the beginning they expected to lecture the poor conservatives on the error of our ways with equal measures of condescension and pity and they expected us acquiesce to their wisdom, but instead to their surprise they got one hell of a fight. All good.
One think that troubles me though: Steve Miller said over there:
"The most memorable thing about that visit was learning that Larry in person was exactly the same as Larry on line."
I really wonder if that is true.Missing your target a bit.
Most protestants don't think Catholics are unsaved or unbelieving. We do reject sacerdotalism and don't understand how y'all got so hung up on that Mary thing. And we'll just mark that building the Church on Peter idea, down to a reading comprehension problem.
As for protestant vs. protestant, most don't sweat the small stuff. I don't care if Pentecostals believe they need to speak in tongues, or Baptists abhor taking an alcoholic drink, etc. Where I do have a problem with any Christian or somebody who identifies as Christian, is when they portray something irrefutably sinful as being okey-dokey. It just doesn't work that way.
And be we whatever shade of Christianity, those pastoral letters still apply to the leadership of the church. The clergy is held to a higher standard. They don't always meet it, but they must strive to do so.
I can't agree with you more, other than the part about who has the reading comprehension problem.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 08:59 last edited bySo I never met Larry.
Could someone here who actually met and talked to him write a few words about him, a eulogy?
-
So I never met Larry.
Could someone here who actually met and talked to him write a few words about him, a eulogy?
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 09:51 last edited by@AndyD said in Dewey's post:
So I never met Larry.
Could someone here who actually met and talked to him write a few words about him, a eulogy?
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
-
@AndyD said in Dewey's post:
So I never met Larry.
Could someone here who actually met and talked to him write a few words about him, a eulogy?
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 10:18 last edited by@Axtremus said in Dewey's post:
@AndyD said in Dewey's post:
So I never met Larry.
Could someone here who actually met and talked to him write a few words about him, a eulogy?
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
Met him for five minutes and cashes that fact in, for so much more than it is actually worth.
-
@AndyD said in Dewey's post:
So I never met Larry.
Could someone here who actually met and talked to him write a few words about him, a eulogy?
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 11:50 last edited by George K 8 Oct 2022, 11:51@Axtremus said in Dewey's post:
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
I believe CathyS met him, but I may be wrong. Steve Miller met him as well.
I spoke with him on the phone for about half an hour.
-
@Axtremus said in Dewey's post:
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
I believe CathyS met him, but I may be wrong. Steve Miller met him as well.
I spoke with him on the phone for about half an hour.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 12:01 last edited by@George-K said in Dewey's post:
@Axtremus said in Dewey's post:
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
I believe CathyS met him, but I may be wrong. Steve Miller met him as well.
I spoke with him on the phone for about half an hour.
She did, as did Cat lady - was that her handle? The former piano dealer in VA. She wandered into his little antique store in TN. She said he didn’t seem happy to be seen by her.
-
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 12:08 last edited by
Not sure what the narrative is. I guess that he was a serial business owner, including a piano shop, but that he wasn’t successful because people who don’t appear gregarious to random pop ins in the middle of their day, are not successful.
-
@Axtremus said in Dewey's post:
No one here at TNCR has met Larry in real life, but a WTF regular has met Larry in real life.
I believe CathyS met him, but I may be wrong. Steve Miller met him as well.
I spoke with him on the phone for about half an hour.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 14:51 last edited by Renauda 8 Oct 2022, 15:38Steve Miller met him as well.
I did lurk “ over there “ and read the thread. Other than Dewey, Frost and Madame Kollontai I really don’t see much in the way of grave dancing.
Likewise, regardless of whether Steve Miller spoke to him five minutes or five hours, I noted that Miller’s physical description of Larry does not at all jive with with alleged photo Gryphon posted some years ago. I remember Steve Miller as a pretty even keel poster and not prone to hyperbole or immoderate statements. Miller’s physical description if Larry is as follows:
”I remember him as being a big, light haired, Irish-looking guy.”
I do recollect Gryphon posting the photo although I do not recall comments from Larry about the picture. Perhaps someone here remembers.
-
Not sure what the narrative is. I guess that he was a serial business owner, including a piano shop, but that he wasn’t successful because people who don’t appear gregarious to random pop ins in the middle of their day, are not successful.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 14:54 last edited by -
Steve Miller met him as well.
I did lurk “ over there “ and read the thread. Other than Dewey, Frost and Madame Kollontai I really don’t see much in the way of grave dancing.
Likewise, regardless of whether Steve Miller spoke to him five minutes or five hours, I noted that Miller’s physical description of Larry does not at all jive with with alleged photo Gryphon posted some years ago. I remember Steve Miller as a pretty even keel poster and not prone to hyperbole or immoderate statements. Miller’s physical description if Larry is as follows:
”I remember him as being a big, light haired, Irish-looking guy.”
I do recollect Gryphon posting the photo although I do not recall comments from Larry about the picture. Perhaps someone here remembers.
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 15:40 last edited by -
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 15:43 last edited by
@George-K said in Dewey's post:
I posted that pic in the "RIP" thread
There's another one, but I'm dang if I can remember where I saw it. It's a pic of Sarah leaning on a gate, and Larry is sitting off to the right, facing the camera.
-
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 15:51 last edited by
I have to admit, even recently, I thought that perhaps he was not a real person. But it does seem like he have been met in real life.
-
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 15:52 last edited by Renauda 8 Oct 2022, 15:52
Yes I know that but I believe it was Gryphon who originally posted it years ago either in Webster’s Coffee Room or Fat Shirley’s. I do remember when was posted although I do not recall the commentary surrounding it.