AOC dragged away in chains!
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 01:46 last edited by
Brave women, not afraid to sacrifice for the cause
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 02:22 last edited by
They are so eager to try and be rebellious.
The irony... they (Congress) are THE way to secure
elective surgeryabortion rights for women. Who are they protesting? They are literally the ones that can do something about it if there are enough votes. Heck, even SCOTUS confirmed that this is a legislative decision, not a judicial one. -
They are so eager to try and be rebellious.
The irony... they (Congress) are THE way to secure
elective surgeryabortion rights for women. Who are they protesting? They are literally the ones that can do something about it if there are enough votes. Heck, even SCOTUS confirmed that this is a legislative decision, not a judicial one.wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 11:29 last edited by@89th said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
They are literally the ones that can do something about it if there are enough votes. Heck, even SCOTUS confirmed that this is a legislative decision, not a judicial one.
Because theater.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 12:14 last edited by
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 12:16 last edited by
The charges will be dismissed, probably.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 12:23 last edited by
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
The charges will be dismissed, probably.
She should be jailed and put in solitary confinement. No bail pending trial.
Because interfering with government work is "insurrection-ey."
-
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
The charges will be dismissed, probably.
She should be jailed and put in solitary confinement. No bail pending trial.
Because interfering with government work is "insurrection-ey."
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 12:25 last edited by Catseye3@George-K said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
No bail pending trial.
And no trial, either. Give her a lesson on what "no rights" really can mean.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 12:38 last edited by
I still don't get why she was wearing a tweed coat in Washington, in July.
-
@George-K said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
No bail pending trial.
And no trial, either. Give her a lesson on what "no rights" really can mean.
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 13:34 last edited by@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
@George-K said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
No bail pending trial.
And no trial, either. Give her a lesson on what "no rights" really can mean.
Oh, she can have a trial. In about a year, like the rest of the plebians.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 13:34 last edited by
@George-K said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
I still don't get why she was wearing a tweed coat in Washington, in July.
Image > Substance?
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 13:35 last edited by
Never trust a populist.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 13:51 last edited by Catseye3
I'm not sure what is the best course of action.
She and the others need to be made to understand how inappropriate were her actions as a member of the US Congress. But what are the optics if she's tried in a court of law? Do the PTB want to risk leaving the impression that demonstrating is against the law? Demonstrating is okay for the populace -- is a good thing, in fact; it gives the people a peaceful means to express their views and let off steam -- but is inexpressibly inappropriate and what Jolly calls head-bangingly stupid for a member of Congress to do so.
Was a time when I believed the public would understand the difference, but in these emotive times, I no longer believe they understand much of anything, and I was probably wrong to believe it in the first place.
I could care less what happens to those jackasses. They can fall off a bridge for all of me. But Congress has a responsibility to uphold its role of dignity and decorum and most of all relevance in the eyes of the public.
They can't let this go, but what do they do? Maybe the best course is to wink at a dismissal of the charges (by some plausible rationale) and then censure them in Congress. Do it in a way that the public understands the seriousness of what they did.
I dunno.
-
I'm not sure what is the best course of action.
She and the others need to be made to understand how inappropriate were her actions as a member of the US Congress. But what are the optics if she's tried in a court of law? Do the PTB want to risk leaving the impression that demonstrating is against the law? Demonstrating is okay for the populace -- is a good thing, in fact; it gives the people a peaceful means to express their views and let off steam -- but is inexpressibly inappropriate and what Jolly calls head-bangingly stupid for a member of Congress to do so.
Was a time when I believed the public would understand the difference, but in these emotive times, I no longer believe they understand much of anything, and I was probably wrong to believe it in the first place.
I could care less what happens to those jackasses. They can fall off a bridge for all of me. But Congress has a responsibility to uphold its role of dignity and decorum and most of all relevance in the eyes of the public.
They can't let this go, but what do they do? Maybe the best course is to wink at a dismissal of the charges (by some plausible rationale) and then censure them in Congress. Do it in a way that the public understands the seriousness of what they did.
I dunno.
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 13:53 last edited by George K@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
inexpressibly inappropriate
Yes, they should have done something more understated and subtle.
They can't let this go, but what do they do?
As @89th said, "Their jobs" - legislate abortion.
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 15:18 last edited by
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
-
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 15:42 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
Thank you for the accurate framing.
-
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 16:26 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 17:07 last edited by@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
you
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
It was performative but that doesn’t mean it was a smoky room conspiracy. Could be that the Capitol police informed them they had to leave or be arrested, and they eagerly agreed to be arrested. Then the social media operator for the Capitol police played their part and tweeted in support of the narrative that was understood to be the point.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 17:10 last edited by@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
You do realize that The Capitol Police is not DC Police? They work directly for The Capitol and report directly to the Speaker of the House. And it’s not exactly a big deal to get them to send out a tweet emphasizing the “arrested”.
-
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
You do realize that The Capitol Police is not DC Police? They work directly for The Capitol and report directly to the Speaker of the House. And it’s not exactly a big deal to get them to send out a tweet emphasizing the “arrested”.
wrote on 20 Jul 2022, 17:22 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
You do realize that The Capitol Police is not DC Police?
Yes, LuFin, I do realize that. I fucking lived there for 13 years.
Although we are subjected to comic book news, we do not live in a comic book world. (You do realize that, don't you?) It may be as simple as Pelosi calling the Capitol Chief and ordering him to do something and bing-bang, it's done, but there's probably a lot more to it, because Washington.
I also can't see the Speaker making that overt a move. But I don't know. Like practically everything that goes on in Washington, we out here don't usually get the whole story.
It may have happened as you say. It may have happened a dozen other ways.