AOC dragged away in chains!
-
"Lock Them Up!" LOL
@taiwan_girl said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
"Lock Them Up!" LOL
Nah! First thing they'll do is call their lawyer! And it will never occur to them that this is a precious right they have! Spend time in lockup with those criminals? Please.
-
They are so eager to try and be rebellious.
The irony... they (Congress) are THE way to secure
elective surgeryabortion rights for women. Who are they protesting? They are literally the ones that can do something about it if there are enough votes. Heck, even SCOTUS confirmed that this is a legislative decision, not a judicial one. -
They are so eager to try and be rebellious.
The irony... they (Congress) are THE way to secure
elective surgeryabortion rights for women. Who are they protesting? They are literally the ones that can do something about it if there are enough votes. Heck, even SCOTUS confirmed that this is a legislative decision, not a judicial one. -
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
The charges will be dismissed, probably.
She should be jailed and put in solitary confinement. No bail pending trial.
Because interfering with government work is "insurrection-ey."
-
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
The charges will be dismissed, probably.
She should be jailed and put in solitary confinement. No bail pending trial.
Because interfering with government work is "insurrection-ey."
-
-
@George-K said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
No bail pending trial.
And no trial, either. Give her a lesson on what "no rights" really can mean.
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
@George-K said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
No bail pending trial.
And no trial, either. Give her a lesson on what "no rights" really can mean.
Oh, she can have a trial. In about a year, like the rest of the plebians.
-
Never trust a populist.
-
I'm not sure what is the best course of action.
She and the others need to be made to understand how inappropriate were her actions as a member of the US Congress. But what are the optics if she's tried in a court of law? Do the PTB want to risk leaving the impression that demonstrating is against the law? Demonstrating is okay for the populace -- is a good thing, in fact; it gives the people a peaceful means to express their views and let off steam -- but is inexpressibly inappropriate and what Jolly calls head-bangingly stupid for a member of Congress to do so.
Was a time when I believed the public would understand the difference, but in these emotive times, I no longer believe they understand much of anything, and I was probably wrong to believe it in the first place.
I could care less what happens to those jackasses. They can fall off a bridge for all of me. But Congress has a responsibility to uphold its role of dignity and decorum and most of all relevance in the eyes of the public.
They can't let this go, but what do they do? Maybe the best course is to wink at a dismissal of the charges (by some plausible rationale) and then censure them in Congress. Do it in a way that the public understands the seriousness of what they did.
I dunno.
-
I'm not sure what is the best course of action.
She and the others need to be made to understand how inappropriate were her actions as a member of the US Congress. But what are the optics if she's tried in a court of law? Do the PTB want to risk leaving the impression that demonstrating is against the law? Demonstrating is okay for the populace -- is a good thing, in fact; it gives the people a peaceful means to express their views and let off steam -- but is inexpressibly inappropriate and what Jolly calls head-bangingly stupid for a member of Congress to do so.
Was a time when I believed the public would understand the difference, but in these emotive times, I no longer believe they understand much of anything, and I was probably wrong to believe it in the first place.
I could care less what happens to those jackasses. They can fall off a bridge for all of me. But Congress has a responsibility to uphold its role of dignity and decorum and most of all relevance in the eyes of the public.
They can't let this go, but what do they do? Maybe the best course is to wink at a dismissal of the charges (by some plausible rationale) and then censure them in Congress. Do it in a way that the public understands the seriousness of what they did.
I dunno.
-
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
The Brad
-
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
Thank you for the accurate framing.
-
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so. Show me the mugshots, show me them being read their Miranda Rights, show me the fingerprinting…
They were escorted away and at their insistence it is being called an arrest…
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka
-
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.
Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
@Catseye3 said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
@LuFins-Dad said in AOC dragged away in chains!:
Please, the whole thing is a publicity stunt. The Capitol Police specifically tweeted that they had arrested 17 members of Congress? They were asked/told to do so.
By whom?
If this is a publicity stunt, then we're deeper down in the rabbit hole than I for one realized. These women may be -- okay, are -- idiots, but they're members of Congress. Why on earth would the Capitol police go along with such an outrageous stunt? Who specifically has the clout to order them to do such a thing?
you
Not saying your version is wrong. But it feels like too bizarre a stretch. And just because you're not seeing the due process doesn't mean it isn't happening. Or -- and this is probably more likely -- there is no due process and they're being held to keep their stupid yaps off the cameras and making everything worse.Thinking about this some more, I wonder if this is in fact more serious than we realize. I don't know enough about Constitutional implications of separation of powers to know if they're threatened somehow. It doesn't seem like it, but if there is some threat there, it's going to be a pretty big deal.
I kind of doubt it, though.
It was performative but that doesn’t mean it was a smoky room conspiracy. Could be that the Capitol police informed them they had to leave or be arrested, and they eagerly agreed to be arrested. Then the social media operator for the Capitol police played their part and tweeted in support of the narrative that was understood to be the point.
