Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The hearings broadcast

The hearings broadcast

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
121 Posts 16 Posters 2.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Online
    HoraceH Online
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    There was an NYT op ed and a book written by a whitehouse insider stating that there was a coalition of high level government operatives who were actively subverting the will of the president. This was framed as a group of "adults in the room" that, thank god, were there to protect America and the world from the worst tendencies of the Infant In Chief. This was, literally, bragging about a subversion of the institution of the presidency, and a subversion of the will of the voters who put Trump there, fair and square.

    There was no backlash from the mainstream in response to this. Because they were so sure that righteous reasons existed for this absolutely fundamental destruction of the institution of the presidency. I found zero "principled" people on the left, or TDS sufferers in general, who had any issue with that op ed and that book.

    Education is extremely important.

    Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      There was an NYT op ed and a book written by a whitehouse insider stating that there was a coalition of high level government operatives who were actively subverting the will of the president. This was framed as a group of "adults in the room" that, thank god, were there to protect America and the world from the worst tendencies of the Infant In Chief. This was, literally, bragging about a subversion of the institution of the presidency, and a subversion of the will of the voters who put Trump there, fair and square.

      There was no backlash from the mainstream in response to this. Because they were so sure that righteous reasons existed for this absolutely fundamental destruction of the institution of the presidency. I found zero "principled" people on the left, or TDS sufferers in general, who had any issue with that op ed and that book.

      Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3
      wrote on last edited by
      #65

      @Horace said in The hearings broadcast:

      that book.

      What was the title?

      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
      • Catseye3C Catseye3

        @Horace said in The hearings broadcast:

        that book.

        What was the title?

        HoraceH Online
        HoraceH Online
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by Horace
        #66

        @Catseye3 said in The hearings broadcast:

        @Horace said in The hearings broadcast:

        that book.

        What was the title?

        A Warning. Apparently the author of that book and the op-ed is no longer anonymous. Miles Taylor. I'd never heard of him. After writing that book, he parlayed his public service job in the Dept of Homeland Security into an equally philanthropic role as a head of government interaction at Google. His social climbing is right on schedule, and was only hastened by his 'courageous' role in the Trump resistance. Glad he's looking out for all of us.

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Away
          AxtremusA Away
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #67

          Link to video

          Statements by William Barr and Ivanka Trump.

          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
          • AxtremusA Axtremus

            Link to video

            Statements by William Barr and Ivanka Trump.

            HoraceH Online
            HoraceH Online
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #68

            @Axtremus said in The hearings broadcast:

            Link to video

            Statements by William Barr and Ivanka Trump.

            That aligns with my conclusions as well.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Away
              MikM Away
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by Mik
              #69

              You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying.

              The editing was done to imply that she did. Just as Jim Jordan's text was tortured to give another false impression.

              Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Trump here. I believe he bears great responsibility for Jan 6. I'm just pointing out that the commission is no more honest than he was.

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              JollyJ AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
              • MikM Mik

                You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying.

                The editing was done to imply that she did. Just as Jim Jordan's text was tortured to give another false impression.

                Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Trump here. I believe he bears great responsibility for Jan 6. I'm just pointing out that the commission is no more honest than he was.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #70

                @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying.

                The editing was done to imply that she did. Just as Jim Jordan's text was tortured to give another false impression.

                Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Trump here. I believe he bears great responsibility for Jan 6. I'm just pointing out that the commission is no more honest than he was.

                1. A hand-picked, Select Committee with predisposed outcome.
                2. Edited testimony and documents.
                3. No cross examination of witnesses. Not really.
                4. Primetime public whatever-the-hell-that-thing-was. It certainly didn't present facts.
                5. Collusion by MSM to provide primetime airtime. Consider it free advertising for the DNC.
                6. No mention of the FBI findings, stating that there was NO insurrection. An FBI that has been documented as having lied to make Trump look bad.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                  You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying.

                  The editing was done to imply that she did. Just as Jim Jordan's text was tortured to give another false impression.

                  Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Trump here. I believe he bears great responsibility for Jan 6. I'm just pointing out that the commission is no more honest than he was.

                  1. A hand-picked, Select Committee with predisposed outcome.
                  2. Edited testimony and documents.
                  3. No cross examination of witnesses. Not really.
                  4. Primetime public whatever-the-hell-that-thing-was. It certainly didn't present facts.
                  5. Collusion by MSM to provide primetime airtime. Consider it free advertising for the DNC.
                  6. No mention of the FBI findings, stating that there was NO insurrection. An FBI that has been documented as having lied to make Trump look bad.
                  HoraceH Online
                  HoraceH Online
                  Horace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #71

                  @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                  @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                  You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying.

                  The editing was done to imply that she did. Just as Jim Jordan's text was tortured to give another false impression.

                  Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Trump here. I believe he bears great responsibility for Jan 6. I'm just pointing out that the commission is no more honest than he was.

                  1. A hand-picked, Select Committee with predisposed outcome.
                  2. Edited testimony and documents.
                  3. No cross examination of witnesses. Not really.
                  4. Primetime public whatever-the-hell-that-thing-was. It certainly didn't present facts.
                  5. Collusion by MSM to provide primetime airtime. Consider it free advertising for the DNC.
                  6. No mention of the FBI findings, stating that there was NO insurrection. An FBI that has been documented as having lied to make Trump look bad.

                  This sort of cultural domination by a political party, with the kangaroo courts and public displays of force to put fear into hearts, is exactly what the left spent so much time warning us about when we elected Donald Trump.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Mik

                    You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying.

                    The editing was done to imply that she did. Just as Jim Jordan's text was tortured to give another false impression.

                    Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Trump here. I believe he bears great responsibility for Jan 6. I'm just pointing out that the commission is no more honest than he was.

                    AxtremusA Away
                    AxtremusA Away
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #72

                    @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                    You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying. ...

                    Yeah, but what do you think of William Barr's testimony?

                    MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG George K

                      @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                      there isn’t more outrage of a sitting President saying his VP should be hanged.

                      Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                      Because the right to cross-examine someone is fundamental to our system. This show doesn't rise to that standard.

                      Besides, what's the actual goal here?

                      Impeachment? Too late.
                      Criminal charges? Against whom, exactly?
                      Outrage? Look! Squirrel (pay no attention to the gas prices)

                      SRSLY, what is the point here?

                      89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #73

                      @George-K said in The hearings broadcast:

                      Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                      I think my first or second post was asking if there was evidence of him saying it since I didn't watch the hearings. Later it shifted to a sadness that the reaction of "lol that's just Trump being Trump" is how low the bar as been lowered if indeed he did say that Pence deserves to be hanged.

                      BTW what's the point? I think Congress has a duty to provide a very clear and accurate picture of what happened that day. I'd say that if it was Obama or Biden at the microphone that day telling his supporters that they should march and confront Congress, that they need to fight like hell, that they can't let an illegitimate president be sworn in, etc.

                      HoraceH JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                      • 89th8 89th

                        @George-K said in The hearings broadcast:

                        Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                        I think my first or second post was asking if there was evidence of him saying it since I didn't watch the hearings. Later it shifted to a sadness that the reaction of "lol that's just Trump being Trump" is how low the bar as been lowered if indeed he did say that Pence deserves to be hanged.

                        BTW what's the point? I think Congress has a duty to provide a very clear and accurate picture of what happened that day. I'd say that if it was Obama or Biden at the microphone that day telling his supporters that they should march and confront Congress, that they need to fight like hell, that they can't let an illegitimate president be sworn in, etc.

                        HoraceH Online
                        HoraceH Online
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #74

                        @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                        @George-K said in The hearings broadcast:

                        Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                        I think my first or second post was asking if there was evidence of him saying it since I didn't watch the hearings. Later it shifted to a sadness that the reaction of "lol that's just Trump being Trump" is how low the bar as been lowered if indeed he did say that Pence deserves to be hanged.

                        It's not coherent or fair to hold people to some standard of outrage over an event that may or may not have occurred. There is plenty of factual common ground we can use to explore differences of opinion and reaction to Jan 6. It's not fair to take this salacious hypothetical, which happens make it sound like there really was an insurrection afoot, and judge people for their reactions to it.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Axtremus

                          @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                          You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying. ...

                          Yeah, but what do you think of William Barr's testimony?

                          MikM Away
                          MikM Away
                          Mik
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #75

                          @Axtremus said in The hearings broadcast:

                          @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                          You will notice she did not say she agreed with Barr, only that she respected him and accepted what he was saying. ...

                          Yeah, but what do you think of William Barr's testimony?

                          You posted both. You tell me.

                          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • 89th8 89th

                            @George-K said in The hearings broadcast:

                            Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                            I think my first or second post was asking if there was evidence of him saying it since I didn't watch the hearings. Later it shifted to a sadness that the reaction of "lol that's just Trump being Trump" is how low the bar as been lowered if indeed he did say that Pence deserves to be hanged.

                            BTW what's the point? I think Congress has a duty to provide a very clear and accurate picture of what happened that day. I'd say that if it was Obama or Biden at the microphone that day telling his supporters that they should march and confront Congress, that they need to fight like hell, that they can't let an illegitimate president be sworn in, etc.

                            JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #76

                            @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                            @George-K said in The hearings broadcast:

                            Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                            I think my first or second post was asking if there was evidence of him saying it since I didn't watch the hearings. Later it shifted to a sadness that the reaction of "lol that's just Trump being Trump" is how low the bar as been lowered if indeed he did say that Pence deserves to be hanged.

                            BTW what's the point? I think Congress has a duty to provide a very clear and accurate picture of what happened that day. I'd say that if it was Obama or Biden at the microphone that day telling his supporters that they should march and confront Congress, that they need to fight like hell, that they can't let an illegitimate president be sworn in, etc.

                            And he also told them to go home.
                            But you're not going to see that.

                            Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                              @George-K said in The hearings broadcast:

                              Got a direct quote for that, or is it "an unnamed person, said that POTUS said that?"

                              I think my first or second post was asking if there was evidence of him saying it since I didn't watch the hearings. Later it shifted to a sadness that the reaction of "lol that's just Trump being Trump" is how low the bar as been lowered if indeed he did say that Pence deserves to be hanged.

                              BTW what's the point? I think Congress has a duty to provide a very clear and accurate picture of what happened that day. I'd say that if it was Obama or Biden at the microphone that day telling his supporters that they should march and confront Congress, that they need to fight like hell, that they can't let an illegitimate president be sworn in, etc.

                              And he also told them to go home.
                              But you're not going to see that.

                              Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                              89th8 Offline
                              89th8 Offline
                              89th
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #77

                              @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                              And he also told them to go home.
                              But you're not going to see that.

                              Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                              I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                              I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                              Just looked at a timeline:

                              • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                              • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                              • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                              • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                              • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                              • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors
                              HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                              • 89th8 89th

                                @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                                And he also told them to go home.
                                But you're not going to see that.

                                Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                                I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                                I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                                Just looked at a timeline:

                                • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                                • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                                • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                                • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                                • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                                • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors
                                HoraceH Online
                                HoraceH Online
                                Horace
                                wrote on last edited by Horace
                                #78

                                @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                                @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                                And he also told them to go home.
                                But you're not going to see that.

                                Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                                I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                                I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                                Just looked at a timeline:

                                • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                                • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                                • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                                • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                                • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                                • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors

                                Trump riled up a mob by convincing them the election was stolen, based on weak or non-existent evidence, the mob broke the law and trespassed into the Capitol, and Trump tsk tsked them upon hearing they broke the law, and told them to go home and stop breaking the law. Historically, this will be considered an insurrection, and we all have to decide where we come down on that framing. Whether we want to side with those pushing that framing, knowing full well the political intentions of that messaging - to shame, in the future, anybody siding politically with the right. You can feel objective all you want, but you might want to consider whose hand you're playing into while you bask in the objectivity.

                                Education is extremely important.

                                89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Away
                                  MikM Away
                                  Mik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #79

                                  More of a tantrum than an insurrection.

                                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                  Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • MikM Mik

                                    More of a tantrum than an insurrection.

                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #80

                                    @Mik said in The hearings broadcast:

                                    More of a tantrum than an insurrection.

                                    Yeah, he acted like a whiny little spoiled brat who's had his teddy bear confiscated.

                                    Sadly, rather than hoicking his underpants over his head and pushing him in the lake where he so richly deserved to be, his little gang of followers went right along supporting his childish outburst.

                                    I was only joking

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • HoraceH Horace

                                      @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                                      @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                                      And he also told them to go home.
                                      But you're not going to see that.

                                      Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                                      I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                                      I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                                      Just looked at a timeline:

                                      • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                                      • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                                      • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                                      • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                                      • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                                      • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors

                                      Trump riled up a mob by convincing them the election was stolen, based on weak or non-existent evidence, the mob broke the law and trespassed into the Capitol, and Trump tsk tsked them upon hearing they broke the law, and told them to go home and stop breaking the law. Historically, this will be considered an insurrection, and we all have to decide where we come down on that framing. Whether we want to side with those pushing that framing, knowing full well the political intentions of that messaging - to shame, in the future, anybody siding politically with the right. You can feel objective all you want, but you might want to consider whose hand you're playing into while you bask in the objectivity.

                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #81

                                      @Horace said in The hearings broadcast:

                                      @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                                      @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                                      And he also told them to go home.
                                      But you're not going to see that.

                                      Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                                      I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                                      I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                                      Just looked at a timeline:

                                      • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                                      • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                                      • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                                      • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                                      • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                                      • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors

                                      Trump riled up a mob by convincing them the election was stolen, based on weak or non-existent evidence, the mob broke the law and trespassed into the Capitol, and Trump tsk tsked them upon hearing they broke the law, and told them to go home and stop breaking the law. Historically, this will be considered an insurrection, and we all have to decide where we come down on that framing. Whether we want to side with those pushing that framing, knowing full well the political intentions of that messaging - to shame, in the future, anybody siding politically with the right. You can feel objective all you want, but you might want to consider whose hand you're playing into while you bask in the objectivity.

                                      Objectively, your first half is pretty accurate. Whether I personally see this as <dramatic music> an insurrection </dramatic music>, based on the evidence I would say overall it wasn't.

                                      It was, in order: A) a protest of thousands on the Mall (per the President's instructions), and of that B) most people protesting moved to protest at the Capitol (per the President's instructions), and of that C) about 10-20% ignored the President's instructions to protest peacefully and followed the President's instructions to fight literally and participated in an insurrection who fought their way inside the Capitol where D) only a few dozen had seemingly violent intentions to confront [or worse] those trying to execute their Constitutional electoral duty.

                                      That being said, I have zero problem if the history books overall classify the events as an insurrection. No President should ever do what Trump did again after a landslide loss. If it were me, I would classify it as a protest over false claims of election fraud, of which there was a minority element that participated in a failed insurrection inspired by false claims.

                                      HoraceH JollyJ LarryL 3 Replies Last reply
                                      • 89th8 89th

                                        @Horace said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        And he also told them to go home.
                                        But you're not going to see that.

                                        Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                                        I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                                        I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                                        Just looked at a timeline:

                                        • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                                        • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                                        • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                                        • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                                        • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                                        • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors

                                        Trump riled up a mob by convincing them the election was stolen, based on weak or non-existent evidence, the mob broke the law and trespassed into the Capitol, and Trump tsk tsked them upon hearing they broke the law, and told them to go home and stop breaking the law. Historically, this will be considered an insurrection, and we all have to decide where we come down on that framing. Whether we want to side with those pushing that framing, knowing full well the political intentions of that messaging - to shame, in the future, anybody siding politically with the right. You can feel objective all you want, but you might want to consider whose hand you're playing into while you bask in the objectivity.

                                        Objectively, your first half is pretty accurate. Whether I personally see this as <dramatic music> an insurrection </dramatic music>, based on the evidence I would say overall it wasn't.

                                        It was, in order: A) a protest of thousands on the Mall (per the President's instructions), and of that B) most people protesting moved to protest at the Capitol (per the President's instructions), and of that C) about 10-20% ignored the President's instructions to protest peacefully and followed the President's instructions to fight literally and participated in an insurrection who fought their way inside the Capitol where D) only a few dozen had seemingly violent intentions to confront [or worse] those trying to execute their Constitutional electoral duty.

                                        That being said, I have zero problem if the history books overall classify the events as an insurrection. No President should ever do what Trump did again after a landslide loss. If it were me, I would classify it as a protest over false claims of election fraud, of which there was a minority element that participated in a failed insurrection inspired by false claims.

                                        HoraceH Online
                                        HoraceH Online
                                        Horace
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #82

                                        @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        @Horace said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        @89th said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        @Jolly said in The hearings broadcast:

                                        And he also told them to go home.
                                        But you're not going to see that.

                                        Besides, you've already made up your mind, so let's not confuse you with facts.

                                        I would hope the hearings (or historical record of events that day) included when Trump eventually posted a video message telling the protestors to go home.

                                        I guess you'll never believe me that I am objective regarding this event. Political parties don't have an impact on my opinion of what happened.

                                        Just looked at a timeline:

                                        • 1:10pm - Trump tells protestors to fight like hell
                                        • 1:45pm - Protestors break through Capitol police line
                                        • 2:24pm - Trump tweets about Pence not having the courage to do what was needed
                                        • 2:24pm - Pence evacuated as the building is flooded with protestors and rioters
                                        • 3:13pm - Trump tweets asking folks to remain peaceful
                                        • 4:17pm - Trump releases video asking folks to go home, and repeats that the election was stolen, the government is taking away their votes, and that he loves the protestors

                                        Trump riled up a mob by convincing them the election was stolen, based on weak or non-existent evidence, the mob broke the law and trespassed into the Capitol, and Trump tsk tsked them upon hearing they broke the law, and told them to go home and stop breaking the law. Historically, this will be considered an insurrection, and we all have to decide where we come down on that framing. Whether we want to side with those pushing that framing, knowing full well the political intentions of that messaging - to shame, in the future, anybody siding politically with the right. You can feel objective all you want, but you might want to consider whose hand you're playing into while you bask in the objectivity.

                                        Objectively, your first half is pretty accurate. Whether I personally see this as <dramatic music> an insurrection </dramatic music>, based on the evidence I would say overall it wasn't.

                                        It was, in order: A) a protest of thousands on the Mall (per the President's instructions), and of that B) most people protesting moved to protest at the Capitol (per the President's instructions), and of that C) about 10-20% ignored the President's instructions to protest peacefully and followed the President's instructions to fight literally and participated in an insurrection who fought their way inside the Capitol where D) only a few dozen had seemingly violent intentions to confront [or worse] those trying to execute their Constitutional electoral duty.

                                        That being said, I have zero problem if the history books overall classify the events as an insurrection. No President should ever do what Trump did again after a landslide loss. If it were me, I would classify it as a protest over false claims of election fraud, of which there was a minority element that participated in a failed insurrection inspired by false claims.

                                        I would go with riot. "Insurrection" implies a plan in the heads of real people, connected to any plausible reality, where the government would be taken over.

                                        Education is extremely important.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • 89th8 Offline
                                          89th8 Offline
                                          89th
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #83

                                          Yeah that makes sense to me too.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups