Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Medical Mary Jane

Medical Mary Jane

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
27 Posts 9 Posters 376 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

    Psychology is based on nebulous and non physical concepts and precepts. I find it difficult to call a science.

    Psychiatry is supposedly based on physical and biological reasoning. The precepts are supposed to be able to be tested, theories are supposed to be provable, and results are supposed to be repeatable. As you can tell by my double use of supposed, you can tell that I have…concerns.

    Aqua LetiferA Offline
    Aqua LetiferA Offline
    Aqua Letifer
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @LuFins-Dad said in Medical Mary Jane:

    Psychology is based on nebulous and non physical concepts and precepts. I find it difficult to call a science.

    Psychiatry is supposedly based on physical and biological reasoning. The precepts are supposed to be able to be tested, theories are supposed to be provable, and results are supposed to be repeatable. As you can tell by my double use of supposed, you can tell that I have…concerns.

    How much have you really looked into either practice?

    Please love yourself.

    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      Mrs. George's pain doc suggested that she try medical cannabis for her chronic pain issues (which, as I mentioned in another thread are remarkably well-controlled with opioids). So she did.

      It was a totally ineffective, uncomfortable, and expensive experiment.

      She went from vaping (coughed her lungs out) to edibles (no effect unless she got stoned) to...quitting.

      The thing that gets me is that here, in the early 21st century, we're suggesting that an unregulated, unmeasured and un-studied chemical is being advocated as a treatment for....whatever ails you.

      That's bullshit.

      Find a disease. Find a medication. Find the dose that you suspect works. Then do the science.

      There's no "science" behind this. Formulations, doses, frequencies are all not studied. This, in my opinion is total bullshit.

      Does it work? Maybe. Show me the studies. Show me the double-blind, peer-reviewed studies. I'll wait.

      I don't have enough knowledge to sat that cannabis is a safe intoxicant. It might be safer than alcohol for all I know.

      But, don't tell me it's a panacea for chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia without showing me (there's that pesky word again) the science.

      As I said, it might be safer than alcohol, which only has a three thousand year history, but as a treatment for disease, you guys can do better. A lot better.

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      MikM markM 2 Replies Last reply
      • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

        @LuFins-Dad said in Medical Mary Jane:

        Psychology is based on nebulous and non physical concepts and precepts. I find it difficult to call a science.

        Psychiatry is supposedly based on physical and biological reasoning. The precepts are supposed to be able to be tested, theories are supposed to be provable, and results are supposed to be repeatable. As you can tell by my double use of supposed, you can tell that I have…concerns.

        How much have you really looked into either practice?

        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        @Aqua-Letifer said in Medical Mary Jane:

        @LuFins-Dad said in Medical Mary Jane:

        Psychology is based on nebulous and non physical concepts and precepts. I find it difficult to call a science.

        Psychiatry is supposedly based on physical and biological reasoning. The precepts are supposed to be able to be tested, theories are supposed to be provable, and results are supposed to be repeatable. As you can tell by my double use of supposed, you can tell that I have…concerns.

        How much have you really looked into either practice?

        Slightly more than most of the subjects we all go on about.

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          I got a flyer on my doorknob a couple months ago for a company that delivers pot.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            Mrs. George's pain doc suggested that she try medical cannabis for her chronic pain issues (which, as I mentioned in another thread are remarkably well-controlled with opioids). So she did.

            It was a totally ineffective, uncomfortable, and expensive experiment.

            She went from vaping (coughed her lungs out) to edibles (no effect unless she got stoned) to...quitting.

            The thing that gets me is that here, in the early 21st century, we're suggesting that an unregulated, unmeasured and un-studied chemical is being advocated as a treatment for....whatever ails you.

            That's bullshit.

            Find a disease. Find a medication. Find the dose that you suspect works. Then do the science.

            There's no "science" behind this. Formulations, doses, frequencies are all not studied. This, in my opinion is total bullshit.

            Does it work? Maybe. Show me the studies. Show me the double-blind, peer-reviewed studies. I'll wait.

            I don't have enough knowledge to sat that cannabis is a safe intoxicant. It might be safer than alcohol for all I know.

            But, don't tell me it's a panacea for chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia without showing me (there's that pesky word again) the science.

            As I said, it might be safer than alcohol, which only has a three thousand year history, but as a treatment for disease, you guys can do better. A lot better.

            MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            @George-K said in Medical Mary Jane:

            Mrs. George's pain doc suggested that she try medical cannabis for her chronic pain issues (which, as I mentioned in another thread are remarkably well-controlled with opioids). So she did.

            It was a totally ineffective, uncomfortable, and expensive experiment.

            She went from vaping (coughed her lungs out) to edibles (no effect unless she got stoned) to...quitting.

            The thing that gets me is that here, in the early 21st century, we're suggesting that an unregulated, unmeasured and un-studied chemical is being advocated as a treatment for....whatever ails you.

            That's bullshit.

            Find a disease. Find a medication. Find the dose that you suspect works. Then do the science.

            There's no "science" behind this. Formulations, doses, frequencies are all not studied. This, in my opinion is total bullshit.

            Does it work? Maybe. Show me the studies. Show me the double-blind, peer-reviewed studies. I'll wait.

            I don't have enough knowledge to sat that cannabis is a safe intoxicant. It might be safer than alcohol for all I know.

            But, don't tell me it's a panacea for chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia without showing me (there's that pesky word again) the science.

            As I said, it might be safer than alcohol, which only has a three thousand year history, but as a treatment for disease, you guys can do better. A lot better.

            I wholly agree. I think it should be legal, but not canonized as it is now.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              Mrs. George's pain doc suggested that she try medical cannabis for her chronic pain issues (which, as I mentioned in another thread are remarkably well-controlled with opioids). So she did.

              It was a totally ineffective, uncomfortable, and expensive experiment.

              She went from vaping (coughed her lungs out) to edibles (no effect unless she got stoned) to...quitting.

              The thing that gets me is that here, in the early 21st century, we're suggesting that an unregulated, unmeasured and un-studied chemical is being advocated as a treatment for....whatever ails you.

              That's bullshit.

              Find a disease. Find a medication. Find the dose that you suspect works. Then do the science.

              There's no "science" behind this. Formulations, doses, frequencies are all not studied. This, in my opinion is total bullshit.

              Does it work? Maybe. Show me the studies. Show me the double-blind, peer-reviewed studies. I'll wait.

              I don't have enough knowledge to sat that cannabis is a safe intoxicant. It might be safer than alcohol for all I know.

              But, don't tell me it's a panacea for chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia without showing me (there's that pesky word again) the science.

              As I said, it might be safer than alcohol, which only has a three thousand year history, but as a treatment for disease, you guys can do better. A lot better.

              markM Offline
              markM Offline
              mark
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              @George-K said in Medical Mary Jane:

              The thing that gets me is that here, in the early 21st century, we're suggesting that an unregulated, unmeasured and un-studied chemical is being advocated as a treatment for....whatever ails you.

              That's bullshit.

              I agree with that 100%. Cannabis is fun. Well, it used to be. As I got older it started to not be so much fun. It actually made me feel worse then when I was not using it. So I stopped. Full stop. No withdrawal, physical or psychological. Period.

              It's a choice to use cannabis. 100% a choice.

              Best way to smoke cannabis is with a bong with ice water in it. Edibles do little to nothing for me. I built up such a tolerance to it, that even smoking very high grade pot, didn't even get me stoned any longer. What's the point in that? 😄

              1 Reply Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                Most people think of cannabis as something that makes memories fuzzy. But new research suggests it can do something more surprising: make false memories feel real.

                While cannabis is often associated with forgetfulness, a new study suggests that acute cannabis intoxication can also subtly distort memory, shaping not just what we recall, but how accurately we recall it. The findings expand on decades of research on cannabis and recall, pointing to a more complex effect on the brain’s memory systems.

                https://www.nationalgeographic.com/health/article/how-cannabis-affects-memory-thc-false-recall

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  I went to a dispensary yesterday with daughter, which was a little weird. Copping dope with my father was not in my experience. They are manned by “budtenders” who want tips. I never had to tip a dealer.

                  "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                  taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Mik

                    I went to a dispensary yesterday with daughter, which was a little weird. Copping dope with my father was not in my experience. They are manned by “budtenders” who want tips. I never had to tip a dealer.

                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @Mik 555

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-K
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @Mik it just shows you how the world is going to hell.

                      OK now, dumb question: does one actually get "high" off of medical marijuana like one did in the "good old days"--or is this something different?

                      Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups