Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court
-
When you’ve lost Andrew McCarthy…
-
When you’ve lost Andrew McCarthy…
@jon-nyc said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
When you’ve lost Andrew McCarthy…
His column is more an indictment of Hawley's objections (and Cruz's, I assume).
Here's what he thinks of the nominee, in more detail:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ketanji-brown-jackson-biden-supreme-court-pick-andrew-mccarthy
-
Of course George, it would be bizarre to suggest that Jackson “lost” McCarthy. I was referring to Hawley’s disingenuous Hail Mary.
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Before going on about child pornography, here's Hawley doing the elbow with Matt Gaetz
Not that there's anything ironic about that, of course.
-
Before going on about child pornography, here's Hawley doing the elbow with Matt Gaetz
Not that there's anything ironic about that, of course.
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
Exactly.
-
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️ -
@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️@jon-nyc said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️Either that or transporting presumably not underage girls across state lines. Haven't looked lately.
-
Today's big Ketanji news is that she is unable to define what is a woman.
She was asked for her definition during today's hearing.
Her answer: no, I'm not a biologist.
Tucker is all over it.
-
The WaPo prints this, presumably with a straight face:
Republicans boast they have not pulled a Kavanaugh. In fact, they’ve treated Jackson worse.
-
Sen. Susan Collins announced that she intends to vote to confirm Brown's appointment to the Supreme Court.
-
I cant find the table (though I am sure it is out there somewhere), but it was a table showing the final votes for each Supreme court justice when the US senators voted on them.
if I remember, judges nominated by Democrat presidents (at least in modern history) usually got a higher number of confirmation votes.
Depending on which side you are on, both statements are true:
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications
or - Democrats are more likely to nominate judges who are more in the center and hold no political view.
LOL
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications
