Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 22:50 last edited by
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 23:19 last edited by
Of course George, it would be bizarre to suggest that Jackson “lost” McCarthy. I was referring to Hawley’s disingenuous Hail Mary.
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 23:19 last edited by
Fawning about her color
He had no interest who or what was inside that color
He was joyous about the color
color, color, color
"He attended a small black church", like he grew up a po' boy
Both of his parents were executives at IBM
-
Of course George, it would be bizarre to suggest that Jackson “lost” McCarthy. I was referring to Hawley’s disingenuous Hail Mary.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:18 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Before going on about child pornography, here's Hawley doing the elbow with Matt Gaetz
Not that there's anything ironic about that, of course.
-
Before going on about child pornography, here's Hawley doing the elbow with Matt Gaetz
Not that there's anything ironic about that, of course.
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:23 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
-
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:25 last edited by@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
Exactly.
-
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:27 last edited by@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️ -
@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:28 last edited by George K@jon-nyc said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️Either that or transporting presumably not underage girls across state lines. Haven't looked lately.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:31 last edited by
Ok this brings us back to McCarthy’s point.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 02:02 last edited by
Today's big Ketanji news is that she is unable to define what is a woman.
She was asked for her definition during today's hearing.
Her answer: no, I'm not a biologist.
Tucker is all over it.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 06:59 last edited by
Funny one from Ken White:
It’s almost as if Jackson, as a district court judge, has experience dealing with irritating, performatively rude, mediocre white guys.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 07:09 last edited by
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 16:26 last edited by
The WaPo prints this, presumably with a straight face:
Republicans boast they have not pulled a Kavanaugh. In fact, they’ve treated Jackson worse.
-
wrote on 30 Mar 2022, 16:04 last edited by
Sen. Susan Collins announced that she intends to vote to confirm Brown's appointment to the Supreme Court.
-
Sen. Susan Collins announced that she intends to vote to confirm Brown's appointment to the Supreme Court.
wrote on 30 Mar 2022, 16:23 last edited by@Axtremus said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
Sen. Susan Collins announced that she intends to vote to confirm Brown's appointment to the Supreme Court.
Was there ever a doubt she would be confirmed?
-
wrote on 30 Mar 2022, 16:34 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Mar 2022, 17:26 last edited by
I cant find the table (though I am sure it is out there somewhere), but it was a table showing the final votes for each Supreme court justice when the US senators voted on them.
if I remember, judges nominated by Democrat presidents (at least in modern history) usually got a higher number of confirmation votes.
Depending on which side you are on, both statements are true:
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications
or - Democrats are more likely to nominate judges who are more in the center and hold no political view.
LOL
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications
-
wrote on 30 Mar 2022, 17:36 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
Good piece from Will.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/03/20/confirmation-questions-jackson-george-will/
He's still alive?
-
I cant find the table (though I am sure it is out there somewhere), but it was a table showing the final votes for each Supreme court justice when the US senators voted on them.
if I remember, judges nominated by Democrat presidents (at least in modern history) usually got a higher number of confirmation votes.
Depending on which side you are on, both statements are true:
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications
or - Democrats are more likely to nominate judges who are more in the center and hold no political view.
LOL
wrote on 30 Mar 2022, 17:38 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
I cant find the table (though I am sure it is out there somewhere), but it was a table showing the final votes for each Supreme court justice when the US senators voted on them.
if I remember, judges nominated by Democrat presidents (at least in modern history) usually got a higher number of confirmation votes.
Depending on which side you are on, both statements are true:
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications
or - Democrats are more likely to nominate judges who are more in the center and hold no political view.
LOL
. Number one is self-evident. Anything other than that is just playing silly booger or being as dense as a rock. I've never considered you dense.
- Republicans are more willing to put bias to the side and vote strictly on qualifications