Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court
-
Anyone following the hearings?
Teh Ted was (ahem) ruthless today.
Cotton got her to say that drug trafficking is a "victimless crime."
Teh Ted also said that the White House is not giving the same information about the nominee to Democrats and Republicans.
Teh Dick said that the GOP is coming close to crossing the line of civility.
ETA: No one asked about her yearbook or her calendar in college, not even "Boofementhal."
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 00:27 last edited by@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
Anyone following the hearings?
Teh Ted was (ahem) ruthless today.
Cotton got her to say that drug trafficking is a "victimless crime."
Teh Ted also said that the White House is not giving the same information about the nominee to Democrats and Republicans.
Teh Dick said that the GOP is coming close to crossing the line of civility.
ETA: No one asked about her yearbook or her calendar in college, not even "Boofementhal."
Ted is correct. IIRC, the Whitehouse is witholding 28,000 pages of documents.
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 00:42 last edited by
For any Supreme Court judge, what is the requirement of documents to give from the White House?
(On another note - 28,000 pages!!!!!
My life file would be boring by comparison!! LOL) -
For any Supreme Court judge, what is the requirement of documents to give from the White House?
(On another note - 28,000 pages!!!!!
My life file would be boring by comparison!! LOL)wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 00:46 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
For any Supreme Court judge, what is the requirement of documents to give from the White House?
Not sure that there really is any such "requirement."
But as a matter of honesty and (cough) ethics, you'd think that all the documents would be available to all members of the committee.
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 01:40 last edited by
If her LSAT scores are good enough for Harvard, then shut up.
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 06:34 last edited by
When you’ve lost Andrew McCarthy…
-
When you’ve lost Andrew McCarthy…
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 19:36 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
When you’ve lost Andrew McCarthy…
His column is more an indictment of Hawley's objections (and Cruz's, I assume).
Here's what he thinks of the nominee, in more detail:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ketanji-brown-jackson-biden-supreme-court-pick-andrew-mccarthy
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 22:50 last edited by
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 23:19 last edited by
Of course George, it would be bizarre to suggest that Jackson “lost” McCarthy. I was referring to Hawley’s disingenuous Hail Mary.
-
wrote on 23 Mar 2022, 23:19 last edited by
Fawning about her color
He had no interest who or what was inside that color
He was joyous about the color
color, color, color
"He attended a small black church", like he grew up a po' boy
Both of his parents were executives at IBM
-
Of course George, it would be bizarre to suggest that Jackson “lost” McCarthy. I was referring to Hawley’s disingenuous Hail Mary.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:18 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Before going on about child pornography, here's Hawley doing the elbow with Matt Gaetz
Not that there's anything ironic about that, of course.
-
Before going on about child pornography, here's Hawley doing the elbow with Matt Gaetz
Not that there's anything ironic about that, of course.
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:23 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
-
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:25 last edited by@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@jon-nyc right.
McCarthy's subsequent objections. are more substantive.
Nevertheless, your statement is "When you've lost McCarthy." It was Hawley who lost McCarthy, not Jackson.
Exactly.
-
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:27 last edited by@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️ -
@George-K said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
@Doctor-Phibes Gaetz might well be guilty of the crimes which are insinuated.
Until he's proven guilty, he's not (that's how our system works, much to your apparent dismay).
But the corollary to your picture...if he is found guilty, would Judge Jackson reduce his sentence below prosecutorial requests?
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:28 last edited by George K@jon-nyc said in Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court:
Is Gaetz’s issue possessing porn? I thought it was fucking underage girls
️Either that or transporting presumably not underage girls across state lines. Haven't looked lately.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 00:31 last edited by
Ok this brings us back to McCarthy’s point.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 02:02 last edited by
Today's big Ketanji news is that she is unable to define what is a woman.
She was asked for her definition during today's hearing.
Her answer: no, I'm not a biologist.
Tucker is all over it.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 06:59 last edited by
Funny one from Ken White:
It’s almost as if Jackson, as a district court judge, has experience dealing with irritating, performatively rude, mediocre white guys.
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 07:09 last edited by
-
wrote on 24 Mar 2022, 16:26 last edited by
The WaPo prints this, presumably with a straight face:
Republicans boast they have not pulled a Kavanaugh. In fact, they’ve treated Jackson worse.