The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha
-
@mik said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
"Wisconsin - we're whiter than white!"
See? There's your problem, right there.
If you were really, really, from Wisconsin, you'd call yourself "Sconnies."
It's like where D2 used to live. You don't say "West Allis." You say, "Stallis."
But, it's Friday night, and there are no fish-frys here in the Chicago 'burbs, so...whatever.
-
-
Another president incites insurrection
Biden calls for calm but says Rittenhouse 'not guilty' verdict leaves him 'angry and concerned'
The president says Americans should protest 'peacefully'
President Biden called on Americans to protest "peacefully" and follow the law following the jury's verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, which he said left him "angry and concerned."
"I urge everyone to express their views peacefully, consistent with the rule of law," Biden said in a statement ahead of expected protests. "Violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-calls-for-calm-in-wake-of-rittenhouse-not-guilty-verdict
-
Yeah the left hates American institutions that don't toe the leftist line. Such as an objectively just verdict that is at odds with leftist outrage. Our tribal leftist president is angry and concerned that an objectively just verdict didn't toe leftist outrage lines. Yeah, congratulations, welcome to America. It's the one the idiots wanted. At least the court made the right decision.
-
@copper said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
President Biden called on Americans to protest "peacefully" and follow the law following the jury's verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, which he said left him "angry and concerned."
They should make their voice be heard!
-
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
Could he face civil penalties? I'm not sure how you establish that he was 51% at fault here when other guys were coming after him with guns.
"My pronouns are FA/FO." - Mik, 2024
-
@mik said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
Could he face civil penalties?
Considering he was found not guilty by reason of self defense, I'd say the probability of success in a civil suit would be slim to nil.
But I'm sure some sleazy lawyer out there will try.
Good luck with that. They better be prepared for a counter-suit.
-
@jolly said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
Watch Biden turn Justice loose on him.
The weapon meets the criteria for a straw purchase.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kyle-rittenhouse-didnt-illegally-bring-043226324.html
Rittenhouse and his friend, Dominick Black, testified that Black, who was 18 at the time, used Rittenhouse's money to purchase the weapon at a Wisconsin hardware store in May 2020. The two reportedly agreed that Black would keep the gun until Rittenhouse turned 18 in January 2021, according to court testimony.
Black is now being prosecuted for participating in the illegal straw purchase of the weapon on behalf of Rittenhouse. But Rittenhouse's possession of the firearm at the time was technically legal.
-
So I guess that means Rittenhouse isn’t getting it back… He better go get another, I’m afraid he will likely need it.
-
@improviso said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@mik said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
Could he face civil penalties?
Considering he was found not guilty by reason of self defense, I'd say the probability of success in a civil suit would be slim to nil.
Tell that to OJ.
It’s always something.
-
@jon-nyc said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@improviso said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@mik said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
Could he face civil penalties?
Considering he was found not guilty by reason of self defense, I'd say the probability of success in a civil suit would be slim to nil.
Tell that to OJ.
Self-defense was never an argument for OJ. In this case we have pretty clear video showing over and over that Rittenhouse never fired until he was being threatened and attacked in EACH situation.
-
That’s not the point. The point is that a not-guilty verdict doesn’t save you from civil liability, which is a much lower bar. I’d say the odds are better than even that Rittenhouse will lose at least one civil suit. Perhaps multiple.
-
I would presume, but the number of people with potential cases is not limited by the number of people be shot. Though obviously some relatives would have better cases than others.
-
@jon-nyc said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
That’s not the point. The point is that a not-guilty verdict doesn’t save you from civil liability, which is a much lower bar. I’d say the odds are better than even that Rittenhouse will lose at least one civil suit. Perhaps multiple.
There's no one who would have a legal standing to sue HIM civilly. The parents of those he shot would be the only ones with standing, but they lost that footing the moment their son made the decision to cause rittenhouse to need to defend himself. If you attack me and I kill you to stop you from harming me, your family can't turn around and sue me in civil court, especially if I've been found to have acted in self defense.
The only one with any standing in a civil suit is rittenhouse himself, not against the families of the ones who threatened him, but against those who lied about him and harmed his good name.
