The Steal
-
https://www.billoreilly.com/b/The-Steal/-404536639918521996.html?dest=/mobile/blogdetail.jsp
The Steal
It was always wrong. But no one could explain exactly how votes were being corrupted in the 2020 presidential election. Trump legal people like Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell ran around condemning voting machines and promoting shady allegations of fraud. But they could never produce forensic evidence of wrongdoing - and both have suffered greatly for their advocacy.
Attorney General William Barr publicly stated that election fraud was committed. Then he disappeared. To this day, President Trump is crazed over the vote. But he and his supporters were on the wrong trail.
I, your humble correspondent, watched closely as the situation unfolded. Corruption in precincts like Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia is not exactly unheard of - is it?
But, again, no hard evidence came forward and I accurately reported that.
Now, a terrible picture is beginning to emerge and ground zero is Silicon Valley, California.
That's where Mark Zuckerberg lives. The Facebook chief apparently took a very large financial interest in the Trump/Biden race for the White House. How large? Well, how about $420 million dollars.
According to a number of reports which have not been denied, Mr. Zuckerberg donated that colossal amount of money to couple of "non-partisan," tax-exempt political operations: The Center for Technology and Civic Life and The Center for Election Innovation and Research.
Turns out these two "centers" are about as non-partisan as Nancy Pelosi.
Reporter Mollie Hemingway, who works for Heritage, investigated the Zuckerberg situation and calls it "genius."
Here's how it worked.
"Vote Navigators" were paid well to canvas mostly poor neighborhoods that traditionally vote for Democrats. Often, these ballot mercenaries would go inside the homes of voters.
Even though it is a crime in all 50 states to "electioneer" at polling places where you walk into and vote, it is not a criminal activity for a third party to interfere with a mail-in ballot. That's the vital loophole.
Thousands of navigators flooded the democrat precincts In Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia - all states that were close between Biden and Trump.
The navigators "assisted" voters in filling out ballots and, at times, "cured" mistakes. That means they corrected ballots so they wouldn't be thrown out.
Sometimes the hired political guns took the actual ballots from the folks and brought them to polling places. That is called "bundling."
The result was a much higher vote count for Joe Biden, as citizens who rarely participate in elections did so with the tutoring.So, now we know why the left loves mail-in ballots so much. They can easily be manipulated with guys like Zuckerberg donating cash to make it happen.
By the way, Marky Mark broke no laws. What he did was perfectly legal and if the states don't crack down on this colossal con, it will happen again in 2024.
Donald Trump lost some of the states mentioned above by extremely small margins. So, this is an enormously important story.
But chances are you will not see it on the network news because the fix is in there, as well. A situation of this magnitude should be front page, lead on TV, for days.
That will not happen and "the steal" could very well continue next time around. So goes our democracy.
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
I'm sorry, but I lost it at the point when Bill O'Reilly described himself as 'humble'.
-
Bill often does that.
Now, since you've made that non sequitur, what are your thoughts on the actual point of the article?
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
-
But chances are you will not see it on the network news because the fix is in there, as well. A situation of this magnitude should be front page, lead on TV, for days.
Well, if you hadn't sexually harrassed people in the workplace, maybe it would be, your dirty old bastard.
(Bill, not Jolly, obviously)
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Steal:
Bill often does that.
Now, since you've made that non sequitur, what are your thoughts on the actual point of the article?
It sounds like a load of old bollocks, to be honest.
I have a problem with people being paid to "correct' other people's ballots.
-
Apparently, Dr. Phibes does not?
-
I'm certainly open to hearing about this being confirmed by more reputable sources.
-
Trump legal people like Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell ran around condemning voting machines and promoting shady allegations of fraud. But they could never produce forensic evidence of wrongdoing - and both have suffered greatly for their advocacy.
Attorney General William Barr publicly stated that election fraud was committed.I don't know about the veracity of what Bill is saying - but he opens up by giving a sort of attaboy to two kooks. Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
So, don't really know what to make of the rest of what Bill says.
-
-
Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
That was my first reaction when I read that, too.
That's not his point. People going in to "correct" ballots before they are mailed in, or to "help" people fill them out is not, according to him, fraud.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Mark Zuckerberg is the new George Soros, apparently.
-
Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
That was my first reaction when I read that, too.
That's not his point. People going in to "correct" ballots before they are mailed in, or to "help" people fill them out is not, according to him, fraud.
The excerpt:
Attorney General William Barr publicly stated that election fraud was committed. Then he disappeared.
My point is that misleading statements like this is exactly why energy is unfortunately spent on debunking the "stolen election" conspiracy. For example, you search for "barr fraud" nearly every article points to his statement that NO widespread fraud was committed. And yet...without knowing that and just reading this sentence and forwarding on this article to fuel the anger in others looking for signs of wrongdoing, I can see why "stop the steal" voters are convinced something nefarious happened that stole the election from Trump, even though he lost in a landslide by his own metric.
-
Barr didn't disappear, either. He quit. Presumably because he couldn't take any more bullshit.
-
"Vote Navigators" were paid well to canvas mostly poor neighborhoods that traditionally vote for Democrats. Often, these ballot mercenaries would go inside the homes of voters.
Even though it is a crime in all 50 states to "electioneer" at polling places where you walk into and vote, it is not a criminal activity for a third party to interfere with a mail-in ballot. That's the vital loophole.
Thousands of navigators flooded the democrat precincts In Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia - all states that were close between Biden and Trump.
The navigators "assisted" voters in filling out ballots and, at times, "cured" mistakes. That means they corrected ballots so they wouldn't be thrown out.
Sometimes the hired political guns took the actual ballots from the folks and brought them to polling places. That is called "bundling."
The result was a much higher vote count for Joe Biden, as citizens who rarely participate in elections did so with the tutoring.In a world where people are willing to share their deepest secrets and "open their souls" for the chance for 15 minutes of media, or extra likes on Tik Tok (or similar), why has there been nobody who has actually proof that they did any of this? LOL Excuse me while I remove my foil hat. LOL
-
Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
That was my first reaction when I read that, too.
That's not his point. People going in to "correct" ballots before they are mailed in, or to "help" people fill them out is not, according to him, fraud.
Shhh...They're busy ignoring his point.
