The Steal
-
But chances are you will not see it on the network news because the fix is in there, as well. A situation of this magnitude should be front page, lead on TV, for days.
Well, if you hadn't sexually harrassed people in the workplace, maybe it would be, your dirty old bastard.
(Bill, not Jolly, obviously)
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Steal:
Bill often does that.
Now, since you've made that non sequitur, what are your thoughts on the actual point of the article?
It sounds like a load of old bollocks, to be honest.
I have a problem with people being paid to "correct' other people's ballots.
-
Apparently, Dr. Phibes does not?
-
I'm certainly open to hearing about this being confirmed by more reputable sources.
-
Trump legal people like Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell ran around condemning voting machines and promoting shady allegations of fraud. But they could never produce forensic evidence of wrongdoing - and both have suffered greatly for their advocacy.
Attorney General William Barr publicly stated that election fraud was committed.I don't know about the veracity of what Bill is saying - but he opens up by giving a sort of attaboy to two kooks. Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
So, don't really know what to make of the rest of what Bill says.
-
-
Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
That was my first reaction when I read that, too.
That's not his point. People going in to "correct" ballots before they are mailed in, or to "help" people fill them out is not, according to him, fraud.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Mark Zuckerberg is the new George Soros, apparently.
-
Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
That was my first reaction when I read that, too.
That's not his point. People going in to "correct" ballots before they are mailed in, or to "help" people fill them out is not, according to him, fraud.
The excerpt:
Attorney General William Barr publicly stated that election fraud was committed. Then he disappeared.
My point is that misleading statements like this is exactly why energy is unfortunately spent on debunking the "stolen election" conspiracy. For example, you search for "barr fraud" nearly every article points to his statement that NO widespread fraud was committed. And yet...without knowing that and just reading this sentence and forwarding on this article to fuel the anger in others looking for signs of wrongdoing, I can see why "stop the steal" voters are convinced something nefarious happened that stole the election from Trump, even though he lost in a landslide by his own metric.
-
Barr didn't disappear, either. He quit. Presumably because he couldn't take any more bullshit.
-
"Vote Navigators" were paid well to canvas mostly poor neighborhoods that traditionally vote for Democrats. Often, these ballot mercenaries would go inside the homes of voters.
Even though it is a crime in all 50 states to "electioneer" at polling places where you walk into and vote, it is not a criminal activity for a third party to interfere with a mail-in ballot. That's the vital loophole.
Thousands of navigators flooded the democrat precincts In Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia - all states that were close between Biden and Trump.
The navigators "assisted" voters in filling out ballots and, at times, "cured" mistakes. That means they corrected ballots so they wouldn't be thrown out.
Sometimes the hired political guns took the actual ballots from the folks and brought them to polling places. That is called "bundling."
The result was a much higher vote count for Joe Biden, as citizens who rarely participate in elections did so with the tutoring.In a world where people are willing to share their deepest secrets and "open their souls" for the chance for 15 minutes of media, or extra likes on Tik Tok (or similar), why has there been nobody who has actually proof that they did any of this? LOL Excuse me while I remove my foil hat. LOL
-
Then, he brings up Barr - who specifically said there was no widespread fraud.
That was my first reaction when I read that, too.
That's not his point. People going in to "correct" ballots before they are mailed in, or to "help" people fill them out is not, according to him, fraud.
Shhh...They're busy ignoring his point.
